· Private foundation
Mohammady Foundation
The primary purpose of this foundation is to engage in charitable, poverty alleviation, low income aid, educational aid, and animal welfare for the benefit of the general public, and it is not organized for the private gain of any person.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $51k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $579k
- $250k+1 grant · $270k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Islamic Relief USA | $270,000 |
| Sabil USA | $225,000 |
| Uplift Charity | $150,000 |
| Islamic Institute of Orange County | $133,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $70,300 |
| Fullerton CollegeAmmar Zahid | $16,052 |
| Minaret Academy | $15,000 |
| Institute of Knowledge | $10,000 |
| CORE | $10,000 |
| UMMA Community Clinic | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Fullerton Muslim Community Center | $5,000 |
| The Citizen Foundation USA | $5,000 |
| Islamic Society of Orange County | $5,000 |
| IslahLA | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +5% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IRISLAMIC RELIEF USA9× · 2017–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +2%
- UCUPLIFT CHARITY CORPORATION9× · 2017–2025 · $3.3M · revenue +72% · 31% of their budget
- SUSabil USA6× · 2020–2025 · $992k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- ICISLAMIC CENTER OF FULLERTONone grant, 2021 · $100k
- USUCLA School of Engineeringone grant, 2017 · $100k
- OCOC COMMUNITY ENDOWMENT FUND INCone grant, 2024 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Develop long-term developmental projects aimed at providing a sustainable living for poor communities as well as supporting needy widows and orphans
Mumanitarian support poor muslim families
Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.
Third Pillar USA is a charity organization based in the United States dedicated to alleviating poverty in the local and global community. Our team comprises of passionate individuals from across the Bay Area working in various professions…
To spread islamic values to the globe through media
International Institute of Islamic Medicine (IIIM) acquires and disseminates knowledge of the rich history of Islamic medicine and fosters its contemporary application
Muslimahs united was founded on islamic principles of justice, integrity, and commitment to community services. we aim to offer support, grounded in islamic practice of justice for muslim women of color, and all women who are affected by…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University Muslim Medical Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Core. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ISLAMIC RELIEF USA ↗
- Who funds UPLIFT CHARITY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Sabil USA ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OC COMMUNITY ENDOWMENT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds CORE ↗
- Who funds Muslim American Society Inc ↗
- Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY MUSLIM MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds ISLAMIC SHURA COUNCIL OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds NAEEM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMPREHENSIVE DISASTER RELIEF ↗
- Who funds WEST COAST ISLAMIC SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ISLAH LA ↗
- Who funds GUIDANCE COLLEGE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hasan Charity Foundation · The Zakat Foundation of America · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Bibi Foundation · M Zamin & Reshma Farukhi Family Foundation · American Muslim Community Foundation · Islamic Relief USA · Orange County Islamic Foundation · Verizon Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mohammady Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Mohammady Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Mohammady Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.