· Private foundation
Ayesha Omar Khadbai Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Youth United with Purpose | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| PEBS USA | $9,675 |
| Masjid Umar Inc | $7,000 |
| Salam Charity USA | $6,500 |
| National Health Forum | $5,000 |
| Give the Needy Foundation | $2,000 |
| Dignity Foundation | $1,000 |
| Right Path Foundation | $1,000 |
| Atlaf and Nasreen Godil Foundation | $1,000 |
| Hidden Humanity | $500 |
| Shaufet Khanum Memorial Tr | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TZTHE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA7× · 2017–2023 · $93k · revenue +173%
- CFCHILDREN'S FUND5× · 2017–2021 · $55k · revenue +51%
- SHSUSTAINABLE HEALTHCARE INITIATIVES NOW EMPOWERING HUMANITY4× · 2017–2020 · $25k · revenue +260%
Funded once
- ARAl Rahman Foundationone grant, 2020 · $414k
- MHMemmon Health Education Foundationone grant, 2023 · $17k
- OFOrphanage Foundationone grant, 2021 · $14k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide food and shelter to the poor people of pakistan
We are a non-profit charity organization that humbly aims to provide to those in need around the world. With gratitude & love, we try to provide food, water, clothing, shelter, peace & education to needy persons, families and communities.
To reduce poverty in Pakistan by empowering poor and underprivileged people.
Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.
To promote , further , and support charitable activities through grants funding and financial assistance to muslims, institutions, and organizations, to solicit and collect donations for the betterment of underpreviledged societies in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hashoo Foundation Usa and the most unlike its peers is Altaf & Nasreen Godil Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 13 years old; the field is 14. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S FUND ↗
- Who funds ALTAF & NASREEN GODIL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SUSTAINABLE HEALTHCARE INITIATIVES NOW EMPOWERING HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds DEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY INC ↗
- Who funds THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds UMANOORG ↗
- Who funds PEBS USA ↗
- Who funds Musaadah Charity ↗
- Who funds SFUSA ↗
- Who funds SALAM CHARITY USA ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL HEALTH FORUM INC ↗
- Who funds MAAS WORLD INC ↗
- Who funds Share To Care Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds The Latina Muslim Foundation ↗
- Who funds Give The Needy Foundation ↗
- Who funds IMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC ↗
- Who funds ISLAMIC CENTER OF IRVINE INC ↗
- Who funds AMOUD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Givelight Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds HASHOO FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds Rightpath Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hasan Charity Foundation · Fatima Welfare Foundation · Saya Foundation · American Muslim Community Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ayesha Omar Khadbai Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ayesha Omar Khadbai Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Ayesha Omar Khadbai Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.