· Private foundation
Raghib Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $139k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $330k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDLIFE FOUNDATION | $180,000 |
| GIVE LIGHT FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC | $50,000 |
| THE AVALON ACADEMY | $25,000 |
| HIDAYA FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| IQRA FOUNDATION | $19,000 |
| GREENE SCHOLARS PROGRAM | $10,000 |
| HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF | $10,000 |
| WEST VALLEY MUSLIM ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| CAIR SFBA | $10,000 |
| LUCILE PACKARD CHILDRENS FUND | $10,000 |
| HUMAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| DEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY | $10,000 |
| SAFEENA FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 49% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $220k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I3× · 2020–2024 · $360k · revenue +361%
- TATHE AVALON ACADEMY3× · 2020–2024 · $90k · revenue +76%
- UPUNITY PRODUCTIONS FOUNDATION3× · 2020–2023 · $32k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- NNISAone grant, 2019 · $100k
- DDIYANETone grant, 2023 · $25k
- MAMUSLIM ADVOCATESone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ummah relief international is a dedicated grassroots relief organization providing humanitarian services to bring help and hope to thousands of victims of natural and human disasters with quick and targeted action.
Hufus' mission is to support higher education in pakistan through support of habib university, pakistan's first not-for-profit, liberal arts and sciences university and a unique example of american education tradition and quality in…
Islamic Scholarship Fund's mission is to support American Muslim storytelling & increase representation in fields & occupations that make public policy & influence public opinion by providing scholarships, internships, fellowships, film…
International Institute of Islamic Medicine (IIIM) acquires and disseminates knowledge of the rich history of Islamic medicine and fosters its contemporary application
An educational organization providing premier educational services to those who cannot afford it, as well as general charitable services
Establish and operate pre-school, elementary, high school.
The foundation fosters and promote the development, knowledge and advancement of education of the teachings of the islamic religion throughout the world
Our mission is to our mission is to counter distortions and misconceptions about Islamic beliefs and practice to demonstrate the Islamic origins of modern values like the rule of law and sciences like market economics to advance the status…
To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.
Human Rights Project
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Iqra Fund and the most unlike its peers is University of Southern California. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds Koshish Foundation ↗
- Who funds Givelight Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE AVALON ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds IQRA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITY PRODUCTIONS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HUNAR FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds DEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY INC ↗
- Who funds MUSLIM ADVOCATES ↗
- Who funds ISLAMIC NETWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds HIDAYA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds MUEED INC ↗
- Who funds IQRA Fund ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Muslim Community Foundation · Jalil Family Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · Good Planet Foundation · Tariq and Asma Farid Foundation · Zakia and Mian Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Hasan Charity Foundation · Pirzada Family Foundation · Yaqub Family Foundation · Darul Sadaqa786 · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Raghib Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.