· Private foundation
M Zamin & Reshma Farukhi Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of M ZAMIN & RESHMA FARUKHI FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k45 grants · $78k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $103k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Bayan | $80,000 |
| Islamic Society of Orange County | $38,500 |
| Momin Lodge | $29,000 |
| Council on American-Islamic Relations | $13,000 |
| MMCC | $12,000 |
| AMPI | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,586 |
| Consultative Committee of Indian Mu | $5,000 |
| Islamic Center of Southbay | $5,000 |
| Orange Crescent School | $5,000 |
| Muslim Community of Folsom | $5,000 |
| Hidaya Foundation | $3,500 |
| Islamic Relief USA | $3,000 |
| Universal Heritage Inc | $3,000 |
| Zaytuna College | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
43 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BBAYAN4× · 2021–2024 · $90k · revenue +39%
- AMAMERICAN MUSLIM PHYSICIAN OF INDIAN ORIGIN5× · 2020–2024 · $48k · revenue +81%
- MLMOMIN LODGE5× · 2020–2024 · $37k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- AFAL-RAHMAN FOUNDATION WAQFgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $32k · revenue +77%
- ICIslamic Center of Santa Anaone grant, 2020 · $1k
- WOWORLD ORPHAN FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
International Institute of Islamic Medicine (IIIM) acquires and disseminates knowledge of the rich history of Islamic medicine and fosters its contemporary application
Develop long-term developmental projects aimed at providing a sustainable living for poor communities as well as supporting needy widows and orphans
Human Rights Project
Aifd's mission is to advocate for the preservation of the founding principles of our u.s. constitution, liberty, and freedom, through the separation of mosque and state. public engagement program provides education to the general public on…
Establish a pool of capital that ensures the long-term sustainability of irusa and enables the charity in achieving its objectives.
Our mission is to our mission is to counter distortions and misconceptions about Islamic beliefs and practice to demonstrate the Islamic origins of modern values like the rule of law and sciences like market economics to advance the status…
Imana fosters health promotion, disease prevention, and health maintenance in communities around the world through direct patient care, health programs, and advocacy.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Muslim Public Affairs Council and the most unlike its peers is Nakadar Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BAYAN ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN MUSLIM PHYSICIAN OF INDIAN ORIGIN ↗
- Who funds MOMIN LODGE ↗
- Who funds AL-RAHMAN FOUNDATION WAQF ↗
- Who funds CAIR-FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Zaytuna College Inc ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY MUSLIM MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds HIDAYA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UPLIFT CHARITY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MUSLIM PUBLIC AFFAIRS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds ISLAMIC RELIEF USA ↗
- Who funds ISLAMIC SHURA COUNCIL OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds ISLAMIC INSTITUTE OF TORRANCE INC ↗
- Who funds ISLAMIC CENTER OF YORBA LINDA A NON-PROFIT RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds MUSLIM COMMUNITY OF FOLSOM ↗
- Who funds RISALA USA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMPASSIONATE CARE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds SAHABA INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds NISWA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF INDOCHINA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Muslim Community Foundation · Bibi Foundation · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · The Tabbaa Foundation · Hasan Charity Foundation · Mohammady Foundation · Islamic Relief USA · Sempra Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · Analog Devices Foundation · Orange County Islamic Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization M Zamin & Reshma Farukhi Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to M Zamin & Reshma Farukhi Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to M Zamin & Reshma Farukhi Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.