Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hasan Charity Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.

International$137kReligion$72kCrime & Legal$49kHuman Services$41kHousing & Shelter$37kHealth$29kEducation$26kPhilanthropy$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$8,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$65k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Doctors Without Borders USA$10,000
USA for UNHCR$10,000
University Muslim Medical Associati$10,000
Salam Charity USA$8,000
Helping Hand for Relief and Develop$5,000
Hidaya Foundation$5,000
ICNA RELIEF USA Programs Inc$3,500
California Cricket Foundation$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%Salam Charity USA: $18k → 8%Helping Hand for Relief and Develop: $5k → 8%Salam Charity USA: $8k → 8%Islah LA: $5k → 14%Helping Hand for Relief and Develop: $3k → 8%Islah LA: $3k → 14%Islah LA: $3k → 14%University Muslim Medical Associati: $10k → 14%University Muslim Medical Associati: $5k → 14%Rahima International Foundation: $5k → 8%University Muslim Medical Associati: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
IL
MI
NY
NJ
CT
CA
VA
AZ
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$257k · 17 repeat orgs$173k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
33

Total granted

$257k
$173k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+14%

Still filing today

76%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesReligionEducationHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $21k · revenue +13%
  • IK
    IMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +106%
  • ICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $19k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • LO
    LAW OFFICE OF SUE SAIGN
    one grant, 2019 · $37k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $29k
  • N
    NUSTIANgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +297%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
2
Muslim Aid America

Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Bangladesh American Society of Muslim Aid for Huma
Philanthropy
4
Rehmat Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Islamic Ummah Relief Corp

Develop long-term developmental projects aimed at providing a sustainable living for poor communities as well as supporting needy widows and orphans

Human Services
6
Al Ansaar Foundation for Humanity
Philanthropy
7
Isaad foundation

Isaad Foundation aspires to preserve human dignity and to help achieve happiness, and to achieve the necessary needs for all individuals.

Philanthropy
8
Us Help Inc

We are a non-profit charity organization that humbly aims to provide to those in need around the world. With gratitude & love, we try to provide food, water, clothing, shelter, peace & education to needy persons, families and communities.

Human Services
9
The Noor Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Allah Wale Trust Inc

To provide food and shelter to the poor people of pakistan

Food & Nutrition
11
American Muslim Instituition

Human Rights Project

Arts & Culture
12
Tvislaamaa

To spread islamic values to the globe through media

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Zakat Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is California Cricket Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Community Health CentersChristian Missionary Organi…Food Pantries & AssistanceSouth Asian Cultural and Sp…Independent K-8 SchoolsMuslim Community Organizati…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%18%<5yr15%15%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr17%42%20–35yr11%9%35–55yr13%3%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%13%<5yr15%22%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr17%40%20–35yr11%20%35–55yr13%2%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 18% of your grantees by number, and just 13% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/37
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,941

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/32
Grantees still filing
19/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LAW OFFICE OF SUE SAIGN — $37,277 · OtherLAW OFFICE OF SUE SAIGNDARUL FALAH ISLAMIC CENTER — $30,000 · OtherDARUL FALAH ISLAMIC CENTERIndividual grant recipient — $29,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC — $20,499 · OtherIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INCHUMAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — $10,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $7,500 · Other+24 more — $69,760 · Other+24 moreUnited States Association for UNHCR — $32,000 · InternationalUnited States Ass…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $20,850 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRO…International Rescue Committee INC — $5,150 · InternationalInternational Res…American Relief Fund Inc — $5,000 · InternationalAmerican Relief F…ISLAMIC RELIEF USA — $2,950 · InternationalFRIENDS OF HUMANITY NFP — $2,500 · International+1 more — $650 · InternationalSALAM CHARITY USA — $26,330 · Human ServicesSALAM CHARITY USAUNIVERSITY MUSLIM MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC — $17,500 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY MUSLIM…ISLAH LA — $11,000 · Human ServicesISLAH LAHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC — $7,600 · Human ServicesHELPING HAND FOR …RAHIMA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $5,112 · Human ServicesRAHIMA INTERNATIO…NUSTIAN — $10,204 · EducationSILICON VALLEY ACADEMY PROJECT — $10,000 · EducationAGHOSH AL-KHIDMAT USA INCORPORATED — $7,998 · EducationDEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY INC — $4,510 · EducationISLAMIC CENTER OF IRVINE INC — $21,945 · ReligionISLAMIC SHURA COUNCIL OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $5,000 · ReligionISLAMIC CENTER OF TEMECULA VALLEY — $1,500 · ReligionICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC — $19,001 · Public Safety & DisasterHIDAYA FOUNDATION — $16,750 · Philanthropy
Other$204,136International$69,100Human Services$67,542Education$32,712Religion$28,445Public Safety & Disaster$19,001Philanthropy$16,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR — $32,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSALAM CHARITY USA — $26,330 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetISLAMIC CENTER OF IRVINE INC — $21,945 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $20,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC — $20,499 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC — $19,001 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY MUSLIM MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC — $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHIDAYA FOUNDATION — $16,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetISLAH LA — $11,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNUSTIAN — $10,204 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSILICON VALLEY ACADEMY PROJECT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAGHOSH AL-KHIDMAT USA INCORPORATED — $7,998 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC — $7,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC — $6,779 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA CRICKET FOUNDATION — $5,250 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $5,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAHIMA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $5,112 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Relief Fund Inc — $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKarwan E ILM Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetISLAMIC SHURA COUNCIL OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY INC — $4,510 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSIMPLY PURE BASEBALL — $4,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCOUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS CALIFORNIA — $3,450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISLAMIC RELIEF USA — $2,950 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF HUMANITY NFP — $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGRAND ALLIANCE FOR PAKISTAN — $2,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHELPING HEARTS CARING SOULS — $1,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetISLAMIC CENTER OF TEMECULA VALLEY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WATER PROJECT INC — $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL HUMANITY NETWORK INC — $250 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Muslim Commu…Fatima Welfare Founda…Mohammady FoundationM Zamin & Reshma Faru…Darul Sadaqa786Edwards Lifesciences …Sempra FoundationBright Funds Foundati…Ayesha Omar Khadbai F…Good Planet FoundationAnalog Devices Founda…Raghib Family Foundat…
American Muslim Community FoundationCA23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Muslim Community Foundation · Fatima Welfare Foundation · Mohammady Foundation · M Zamin & Reshma Farukhi Family Foundation · Darul Sadaqa786 · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · Ayesha Omar Khadbai Foundation · Good Planet Foundation · Analog Devices Foundation · Raghib Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hasan Charity Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home