· Private foundation
Harris Rosen Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k34 grants · $99k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $148k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $413k
- $250k+2 grants · $568k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JACK & LEE ROSEN JCC | $296,267 |
| ROSEN ASSOCIATE SCHOLARSHIP | $271,684 |
| FOUNDATION FOR OCPS | $166,142 |
| JACK & LEE ROSEN JCC | $129,818 |
| JACK & LEE ROSEN JCC | $65,400 |
| RUNWAY TO HOPE INC | $51,500 |
| GAINESVILLE FOR ALL | $35,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $33,111 |
| Individual grant recipient | $18,900 |
| Individual grant recipient | $18,260 |
| COAST GUARD AUXILLIARY ASSOCIATION INC | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $14,972 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $12,995 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER ORLANDO | $8,500 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL FLORIDA | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.
43 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $624k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RAROSEN AQUATIC AND FITNESS CENTER INC4× · 2020–2023 · $1.6M · revenue +200% · 42% of their budget
- UOUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC6× · 2017–2023 · $1.4M · revenue +52%
- JLJACK & LEE ROSEN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC5× · 2017–2022 · $1.4M · revenue +22%
Funded once
- RYRosen YMCA Aquatic Family Centerone grant, 2019 · $1.2M
- RPROSEN PARRAMORE PS 8 FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $878k · revenue +90% · 41% of their budget
- RYRosen YMCA Aquatic Centerone grant, 2018 · $877k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…
To provide opportunity to young people and develop leaders for industry, philanthropy, education and the community through the intercollegiate athletic experience.
Embry-riddle is the world leader in aviation and aerospace higher education. its mission is to teach the science, practice and business of aviation and aerospace, preparing students for productive careers and leadership roles in business,…
University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…
To promote, encourage and enhance research activities at the university of south florida.
Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.
The mission of the university of florida alumni association, inc. ("association") is to exclusively support and enhance the mission of the university of florida ("university") of pursuing "excellence in education and research and shaping a…
As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…
The mission of the florida atlantic university foundation inc. is to encourage, promote, and provide funds and other resources for the benefit of florida atlantic university (a part of the florida state university system) in furtherance of…
The fiu research foundation provides means by which discoveries, inventions, processes, and work products of faculty, staff and students of the university may be patented, developed, applied and utilized in order that the results of such…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Leaving Legacies Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 170 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TANGELO PARK PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds ROSEN AQUATIC AND FITNESS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JACK & LEE ROSEN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ROSEN PARRAMORE PS 8 FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SHALOM ORLANDO INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
- Who funds Runway to Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds ROLLINS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds COAST GUARD AUXILIARY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds Nova Southeastern University Inc ↗
- Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Central Florida Foundation · Adventist Health SystemSunbelt Inc · Universal Orlando Foundation Inc · Orlando Health Inc · Heart of Florida United Way Inc · The Dr P Phillips Foundation · Ginsburg Family Foundation Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation · Devos Family Foundation · The Lee Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Harris Rosen Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- United Cerebral Palsy of Central Florida Inc — 13% of income from government
- Idignity Inc — 6% of income from government
- Nova Southeastern University Inc — 2% of income from government
- Shalom Orlando Inc — 2% of income from government
- National Yiddish Book Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Habitat for Humanity Greater Orlando and Osceola County Inc — 1% of income from government
- Heart of Florida United Way Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rollins College — 0% of income from government
- Gainesville for All — 0% of income from government
- Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
- Webber International University — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Harris Rosen Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Harris Rosen Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.