Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harold Rubenstein Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$233k
Granted FY2025still arriving
54
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$796kEducation$604kEnvironment$358kHealth$106kHuman Services$100kScience & Tech$94kFood & Nutrition$75kRecreation & Sports$52kOther$0
02FY2025 · 54 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k51 grants · $178k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
$3,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DC PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$25,000
YALE COLLEGE$20,000
ROCK CREEK CONSERVANCY$10,000
FOLGER SHAKESPEARE LIBRARY (UNDER AMHERST COLLEGE)$9,500
100REPORTERS$8,500
HARVARD PRESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE$8,000
TELLURIDE FOUNDATION$8,000
ACLU FOUNDATION$7,000
STUDIO THEATRE$5,500
FOOD & FRIENDS$5,000
THEATRE JEDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$5,000
MOVEMENT VOTER FUND$5,000
TELLURIDE SCIENCE RESEARCH CENTER$5,000
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION$5,000
TROUT UNLIMITED$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OLD COLONY YMCA: $2k → 8%BETHESDA CARES: $3k → 8%BETHESDA CARES: $3k → 8%BETHESDA CARES: $3k → 8%BETHESDA CARES: $3k → 8%BETHESDA CARES: $3k → 8%BETHESDA CARES: $2k → 8%BETHESDA CARES: $2k → 8%BETHESDA CARES: $2k → 8%BETHESDA CARES: $1k → 8%PARENT ENCOURAGEMENT PROGRAM PEP: $1k → 8%PARENT ENCOURAGEMENT PROGRAM PEP: $1k → 8%PARENT ENCOURAGEMENT PROGRAM PEP: $1k → 8%PARENT ENCOURAGEMENT PROGRAM PEP: $1k → 8%FAIR CHANCE: $2k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $9k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $8k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $7k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $3k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $3k → 14%CENTRONIA: $5k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $3k → 14%ANCHOR FUND: $2k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $2k → 14%CENTRONIA: $1k → 14%CENTRONIA: $500 → 14%CENTRONIA: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OR
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Harold Rubenstein Family Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Harold Rubenstein Family Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 97 repeat orgs$163k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

97 repeat relationships: 45 still active in FY2025, 52 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

97
32

Total granted

$1.9M
$113k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+11%

Still filing today

60%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesCivil RightsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DO
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $350k · revenue +82%
  • WM
    Woolly Mammoth Theatre Company Inc
    6× · 2017–2024 · $146k · revenue +22%
  • LM
    LEVINE MUSIC INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $66k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • HC
    HARVARD COLLEGE FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • TV
    THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue -34%
  • US
    UNITED STATES NATIONAL ARBORETUM
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
2
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments

Create a more accessible, sustainable, prosperous and livable national capital region by being a discussion forum, expert resource, issue advocate, and catalyst for action.

Public Benefit
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
Washington Performing Arts Society

Washington performing arts champions the arts as a unifying force. through collaborations with artists, educators, community leaders, and institutional partners, we bring wide-ranging artistic programs to stages, schools, and neighborhoods…

Arts & Culture
5
The Cultural Landscape Foundation

A non-profit established in 1998, the cultural landscape foundation (tclf) connects people to places. tclf educates and engages the public to make our shared landscape heritage more visible, identify its value, and empower its stewards.…

Arts & Culture
6
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
9
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
10
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
11
Center Stage Associates Inc

See schedule o.inspired by our home city, baltimore center stage acts as a cultural catalyst for all communities to access theater in every form and engage in compelling conversations. programming: capture the collective imagination and…

Arts & Culture
12
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Downtowndc Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Sparky Productions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

78 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 78 of the 140 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
77/78
Grantees still filing
55/78
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $150,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYFOLGER SHAKESPEARE LIBRARY (UNDER AMHERST COLLEGE): $84,500 · OtherFOLGER SHAKESPEARE LIBRARY (UNDER AMHERST COLLEGE)HARVARD PRESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE: $58,000 · OtherFOLGER SHAKESPEARE LIBRARY: $52,800 · OtherHARVARD COLLEGE FUND: $50,000 · OtherSHAKESPEARE THEATRE - HARMON CENTER: $44,000 · OtherGLOBAL HERITAGE FUND: $41,500 · Other+83 more: $659,550 · Other+83 moreDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $349,900 · EducationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUB…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $80,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of…+8 more: $65,000 · Education+8 moreWoolly Mammoth Theatre Company Inc: $145,600 · Arts & CultureWoolly Mammoth The…LEVINE MUSIC INC: $65,600 · Arts & CultureLEVINE MUSIC INCNational Gallery of Art: $56,500 · Arts & CultureNational Gallery o…NATIONAL THEATRE IN AMERICA INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL THEATRE I…MOUNTAINFILM: $14,500 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILLIPS COLLECTION: $14,421 · Arts & CultureCOSMOS CLUB HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $14,000 · Arts & Culture+11 more: $44,200 · Arts & Culture+11 moreAMERICAN RIVERS INC: $50,000 · EnvironmentRock Creek Conservancy Inc: $46,250 · EnvironmentFriends of the National Arboretum: $16,500 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $9,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $5,500 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE LEGAL ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 · Environment+1 more: $4,500 · EnvironmentIona Senior Services: $38,500 · Human ServicesBETHESDA CARES INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesCENTRONIA: $6,500 · Human ServicesPARENT ENCOURAGEMENT PROGRAM INC: $4,000 · Human Services+3 more: $6,000 · Human ServicesTELLURIDE FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Recreation & SportsTelluride Mountain Club: $4,750 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF MITCHELL PARK INC: $2,250 · Recreation & SportsCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $35,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · Civil RightsTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $6,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $2,500 · Civil Rights
Other$1,140,350Education$494,900Arts & Culture$374,821Environment$148,750Human Services$75,000Recreation & Sports$52,000Civil Rights$50,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $349,900 over 8y, 10% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $150,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWoolly Mammoth Theatre Company Inc: $145,600 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $80,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEVINE MUSIC INC: $65,600 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNational Gallery of Art: $56,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC: $50,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRock Creek Conservancy Inc: $46,250 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetTELLURIDE FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGLOBAL HERITAGE FUND: $41,500 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetIona Senior Services: $38,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $38,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $34,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD & FRIENDS INC: $25,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $24,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAH HAA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS: $24,200 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTELLURIDE COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS AND HUMAN DBA TELLURIDE ARTS: $22,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL THEATRE IN AMERICA INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBETHESDA CARES INC: $20,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $19,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the National Arboretum: $16,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAINFILM: $14,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PHILLIPS COLLECTION: $14,421 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOSMOS CLUB HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMARET SCHOOL INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $11,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budget100REPORTERS: $11,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetNATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM: $10,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGETOWN DAY SCHOOL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTelluride Historical Museum Inc: $10,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Pinhead Institute: $7,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetDEMOCRACY FORWARD: $7,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetThe Studio Theatre Inc: $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTAIR OF BIRMINGHAM: $6,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCENTRONIA: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAIR & SPACE FORCES AID SOCIETY INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE LEGAL ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Woolly Mammoth Theatre Company Inc ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds LEVINE MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds National Gallery of Art ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN RIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Rock Creek Conservancy Inc ↗
  • Who funds TELLURIDE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL HERITAGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Iona Senior Services ↗
  • Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION & CHOICES ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD & FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AH HAA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds TELLURIDE COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS AND HUMAN DBA TELLURIDE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL THEATRE IN AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds BETHESDA CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the National Arboretum ↗
  • Who funds THE POSSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAINFILM ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILLIPS COLLECTION ↗
  • Who funds COSMOS CLUB HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC42.7× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Nora Roberts Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · United Way of the National Capital Area · Telluride Foundation · Max & Victoria Dreyfus Foundation Inc · Ebb Point Foundation- Blackrock · Community Foundation of the Gunnison Valley · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · Open Society Institute

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harold Rubenstein Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harold Rubenstein Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Bethesda Cares Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Rock Creek Conservancy Inc: 60% of income from government
  • Parent Encouragement Program Inc: 22% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Harold Rubenstein Family Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Harold Rubenstein Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 140 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harold Rubenstein Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph