· Private foundation
Ebb Point Foundation- Blackrock
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k18 grants · $74k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $168k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS | $68,000 |
| MOUNTAINFILM LTD | $50,000 |
| BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE | $50,000 |
| COMMUNITY INITIATIVES | $25,000 |
| NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER | $10,000 |
| WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS | $7,000 |
| CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS | $5,000 |
| TELLURIDE REPERTORY THEATRE CO | $5,000 |
| SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| TREEPEOPLE INC | $5,000 |
| AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL | $5,000 |
| TELLURIDE ONE TO ONE | $5,000 |
| RURAL UTAH PROJECT EDUCATION FUND | $5,000 |
| MISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
36 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2023, 24 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TGTHE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT INCUBATOR INC2× · 2021–2022 · $225k · revenue +76%
- IRInternational Rescue Committee INC3× · 2019–2021 · $215k · revenue +67%
- EJEQUAL JUSTICE WORKS4× · 2019–2023 · $195k · revenue +19%
Funded once
PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECTgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +63%
UNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INCone grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue -49%- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…
Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.
U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…
To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Immigration Law Center and the most unlike its peers is Faith Crusades Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
82 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 82 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ROOT CAPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAINFILM ↗
- Who funds THE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT INCUBATOR INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS ↗
- Who funds Trust for Housing ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY INITIATIVES ↗
- Who funds PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds UNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds TELLURIDE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds Transgender Law Center ↗
- Who funds BEHIND THE BOOK INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds TELLURIDE SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds THE TELLURIDE ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AH HAA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds TELLURIDE REPERTORY THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds UNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT AKILAH INC ↗
- Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PATHWAYS TO HOUSING DC ↗
- Who funds CHICKEN & EGG FILMS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Telluride Foundation · The Thomas Phillips and Jane Moore Johnson Foundation · Community Foundation of the Gunnison Valley · The Dalton Family Foundation · Just For Kids Foundation Inc · The Lisa and Victor Nemeroff Foundation · The Mclaughlin Doty Foundation · Harold Rubenstein Family Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Todd W Hoffman Foundation Inc · Tecumseh Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ebb Point Foundation- Blackrock funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Root Capital Inc — 9% of income from government
- The Maritime Aquarium at Norwalk Inc — 5% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ebb Point Foundation- Blackrock?
Find your warmest path to Ebb Point Foundation- Blackrock through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.