· Private foundation
Hannaford Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k7 grants · $125k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $715k
- $250k+2 grants · $600k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| United Way of Southern Maine (AKA United Way of Greater Portland) | $350,000 |
| Boys & Girls Clubs of Southern Maine | $250,000 |
| Northeastern University | $125,000 |
| Scholarship America Inc | $120,100 |
| Champlain Valley Office of Economic Opportunity | $100,000 |
| Dempsey Centers for Quality Cancer Care | $100,000 |
| Vermont Foodbank | $100,000 |
| HFM Prevention Council | $70,000 |
| In Our Own Voices | $50,000 |
| Bangor Region YMCA | $50,000 |
| YMCA Community Center of Rome New York (aka YMCA Tri-Valley) | $25,000 |
| Fork Food Lab | $25,000 |
| Mid Coast Hunger Prevention Program | $25,000 |
| Glens Falls Area Youth Center | $20,000 |
| Bennington Early Childhood Center | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $849k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $395k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BYBANGOR YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION4× · 2022–2025 · $350k · revenue +53%
- DCDempsey Center for Quality Cancer Care3× · 2021–2025 · $210k · revenue +10%
- VFVERMONT FOODBANK2× · 2024–2025 · $200k · revenue +15%
Funded once
- UWUnited Way of Southern Maineone grant, 2022 · $350k
- PPrebleone grant, 2021 · $250k
- M(MaineHealth (fbo Maine Medical Center)one grant, 2022 · $240k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
It is the mission of Eastern Area Agency on Aging to be the best source of information, options, and services for seniors, adults with disabilities, and caregivers.
Provide quality, nutritious and creative meals to individuals age sixty years and older; as well as, disabled residents of Bennington County, Vermont. This is accomplished through a community meal program and home deliveries to those…
Penobscot Community Health Center (PCHC) is a non-profit organization incorporated in 1997 that is governed by a Board of community volunteers and is the largest Federally Qualified Health Center in Maine. PCHC is driven by its mission…
Our mission is to provide quality, affordable early childhood education that fosters individual success and a lifelong love of learning.
Gather offers innovative programs that build food security in welcoming and dignified ways. These include our pantry market, mobile markets, Meals 4 Kids, Cooking 4 Community, gleaning, and our Gather Cafe at Great Bay Community College.
NOFA-NH actively promotes organic, regenerative, ecologically sound farming, gardening, eating, and land care practices for healthy communities. NOFA-NH helps people build local, just, and sustainable food systems.
The Organization is committed to establishing a community that provides for the whole person with nourishing food, kindness and dignity. The Organization provides food directly to those experiencing food insecurity while also directing the…
A broad multi-disciplinary network that works to ensure we can all live healthy, engaged, and secure lives as we age in our homes and communities. With the voices of people with lived experience, we work on policy issues related to…
Daycare services
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Maine creates, finds and supports programs that directly improve the health and well being of children statewide; provides affordable home away from home lodging which increases access to medical care for…
Promise Early Education Center's (formerly Androscoggin Head Start and Child Care) mission is to educate, engage and empower families, one child at a time.
The locker project connects food-insecure children in maine with nourishing food to improve their learning capacity, health, and future.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Grieving Children and the most unlike its peers is Oxford Hills Community Gardens. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds United Way Inc ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Southern Maine ↗
- Who funds BANGOR YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MaineHealth ↗
- Who funds Dempsey Center for Quality Cancer Care ↗
- Who funds VERMONT FOODBANK ↗
- Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Saint Joseph's College Saint Joseph's College of Maine ↗
- Who funds Hospice of Southern Maine ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE CAPITAL DISTRICT (4416) ↗
- Who funds Ecology Education Inc ↗
- Who funds Salvation Farms Inc ↗
- Who funds IN OUR OWN VOICES INC ↗
- Who funds Good Shepherd Food Bank ↗
- Who funds PREBLE STREET ↗
- Who funds CHAMPLAIN VALLEY OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds ALCOHOLISM & SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL OF HFM COUNTIES INC ↗
- Who funds TAMWORTH COMMUNITY NURSE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds TEDFORD HOUSING ↗
- Who funds SAINT ANNE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds GLENS FALLS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOOD CONNECTS ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN NH INC ↗
- Who funds York Hospital ↗
- Who funds Trinity Jubilee Center Inc ↗
- Who funds My Place Teen Center Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · John T Gorman Foundation · Simmons Foundation - PerkinsThompson · Fisher Charitable Foundation · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Stephen & Tabitha King Foundation Inc · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Davis Family Foundation · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hannaford Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bennington Early Childhood Center Inc — 36% of income from government
- Salvation Farms Inc — 26% of income from government
- Champlain Valley Office of Economic Opportunity Inc — 23% of income from government
- Food Connects — 15% of income from government
- Vermont Foodbank — 13% of income from government
- The Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro South Inc — 13% of income from government
- Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
- Merrimack Valley Food Bank Inc — 3% of income from government
- Boys and Girls Clubs of Metrowest Inc — 2% of income from government
- The University of Vermont Medical Center — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hannaford Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Hannaford Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.