Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hadley & Marion Stuart Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$1.8M
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$17MAnimals$4.7MHealth$2.7MYouth Development$900kHuman Services$585kArts & Culture$85kReligion$30kInternational$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $245k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $715k
  • $250k+5 grants · $4.9M
$50,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$112M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CSU FOUNDATION$1,750,000
SWEET BRIAR COLLEGE$1,500,000
MARIANAPOLIS PREPARATORY SCHOOL$600,000
MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION$550,000
CONQUER PARALYSIS NOW$500,000
RESCUE RANCH$165,000
TONY STEWART FOUNDATION$150,000
GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND$125,000
CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE$100,000
IDAHO YOUTH RANCH$75,000
GREENWOOD WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER$50,000
HUMBLE RANCH THERAPY CENTER$50,000
Individual grant recipient$45,000
PET PARTNERS$40,000
CODE 3 ASSOCIATES INC$40,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $500k → 8%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $100k → 12%BESSIE'S HOPE: $20k → 12%TONY STEWART FOUNDATION: $150k → 5%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $150k → 8%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $100k → 12%BESSIE'S HOPE: $20k → 12%TONY STEWART FOUNDATION: $150k → 5%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $100k → 8%BESSIE'S HOPE: $20k → 12%TONY STEWART FOUNDATION: $150k → 5%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $75k → 8%BESSIE'S HOPE: $15k → 12%TONY STEWART FOUNDATION: $150k → 5%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $75k → 8%BESSIE'S HOPE: $15k → 12%TONY STEWART FOUNDATION: $150k → 5%CHILDREN'S SPEECH & READING CENTER: $50k → 11%CHILDREN'S SPEECH & READING CENTER: $50k → 11%CHILDREN'S SPEECH & READING CENTER: $25k → 11%CHILDREN'S SPEECH & READING CENTER: $25k → 11%CHILDREN'S SPEECH & READING CENTER: $25k → 11%WISH OF A LIFETIME: $15k → 12%WISH OF A LIFETIME: $15k → 12%WISH OF A LIFETIME: $15k → 12%WISH OF A LIFETIME: $15k → 12%WISH OF A LIFETIME: $15k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
IN
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
AZ
KS
NC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$25M · 23 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against -8% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
4

Total granted

$25M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
-8%

Still filing today

83%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsEducationHealthPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $7.8M · revenue +54%
  • SB
    SWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $4.6M · revenue +17%
  • MA
    MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue -8%
  • Foxcroft Schoolgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +63%
  • BL
    BETHLEHEM LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
2
Spokanimal Care

Spokanimal leads communities in humane/proactive ways to promote and preserve the human-companion animal bond.

Animals
3
Denver Dumb Friends League

Working with our compassionate community, we will end pet homelessness and animal suffering.

Animals
4
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
5
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
6
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
7
The Colorado Humane Society & Spca Inc

See schedule o.to prevent cruelty and neglect of animals within the state of colorado by:-assisting agencies in the enforcement of laws relating to cruelty and neglect of companion animals and equines-educating the public on animal welfare…

8
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
9
Summit Assistance Dogs

Summit assistance dogs is a nonprofit organization that creates life-changing partnerships by providing highly-trained mobility assistance dogs for people living with disabilities.

Human Services
10
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
11
Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland

The Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland nurtures the connection between people and pets to advance animal welfare and improve the quality of life in our community.

Animals
12
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canine Companions for Independence Inc and the most unlike its peers is Code 3 Associates Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $7,783,500 · EducationCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONSWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE — $4,600,000 · EducationSWEET BRIAR INSTITUTEUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION+1 more — $50,000 · EducationMARIANAPOLIS PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $3,600,000 · OtherMARIANAPOLIS PREP…Individual grant recipient — $325,000 · OtherIndividual grant …HUMBLE RANCH THERAPY CENTER — $155,000 · Other+2 more — $100,000 · OtherMORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION — $1,585,000 · AnimalsMORRIS ANIMAL F…RESCUE RANCH INC — $765,000 · AnimalsRESCUE RANCH IN…THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC — $530,000 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCI…HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION — $500,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY …PET PARTNERS — $140,000 · Animals+1 more — $110,000 · AnimalsIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC — $900,000 · Human ServicesIDAHO YOUTH …THE TONY STEWART FOUNDATION INC — $750,000 · Human ServicesTHE TONY STE…GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC — $420,000 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS F…CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $330,000 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPA…TRU COMMUNITY CARE — $200,000 · Human ServicesTRU COMMUNIT…CHILDREN'S SPEECH & READING CENTER — $175,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S S…+2 more — $165,000 · Human Services+2 moreSAM SCHMIDT FOUNDATION — $1,400,000 · HealthCODE 3 ASSOCIATES INC — $665,000 · Public Safety & DisasterLONGMONT THEATRE COMPANY INC — $85,000 · Arts & CultureNO BARRIERS USA — $15,000 · International
Education$13,433,500Other$4,180,000Animals$3,630,000Human Services$2,940,000Health$1,400,000Public Safety & Disaster$665,000Arts & Culture$85,000International$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $7,783,500 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetSWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE — $4,600,000 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetMORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION — $1,585,000 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetSAM SCHMIDT FOUNDATION — $1,400,000 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC — $900,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetRESCUE RANCH INC — $765,000 over 5y, 31% of budgetTHE TONY STEWART FOUNDATION INC — $750,000 over 5y, 43% of budgetCODE 3 ASSOCIATES INC — $665,000 over 5y, 99% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC — $530,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION — $500,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC — $420,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $330,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTRU COMMUNITY CARE — $200,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S SPEECH & READING CENTER — $175,000 over 5y, 9.6% of budgetPET PARTNERS — $140,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetGREENWOOD WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER — $110,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetBessies Hope — $90,000 over 5y, 27% of budgetLONGMONT THEATRE COMPANY INC — $85,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetWish of a Lifetime — $75,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetFoxcroft School — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNO BARRIERS USA — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE
  • Who funds MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SAM SCHMIDT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC
  • Who funds RESCUE RANCH INC
  • Who funds THE TONY STEWART FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CODE 3 ASSOCIATES INC
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION
  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC
  • Who funds TRU COMMUNITY CARE
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S SPEECH & READING CENTER
  • Who funds PET PARTNERS
  • Who funds GREENWOOD WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER
  • Who funds Bessies Hope
  • Who funds LONGMONT THEATRE COMPANY INC
  • Who funds Wish of a Lifetime
  • Who funds Foxcroft School
  • Who funds NO BARRIERS USA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO20.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hadley & Marion Stuart Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph