Skip to content
Guthrie Charitable Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Guthrie Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$73k
Granted FY2021
5
Grants FY2021
5
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Religion$435kHuman Services$228kHealth$175kEducation$70kAnimals$70kHousing & Shelter$40kYouth Development$30kFood & Nutrition$25kOther$0
02FY2021 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
$11,035
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Looking Glass Community Services$32,455
Haslet Fire Department Support Grou$11,035
My Sister's Place Inc$11,035
Thousand Hills Cattle Inc$10,385
United Methodist Committee on Relie$7,608
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Blue Sky Therapeutic Riding and Res: $10k → 8%Free Will Baptist Children's Home o: $20k → 20%Looking Glass Community Services: $32k → 15%PEST Relief International Inc: $10k → 13%King's Home: $20k → 7%Community Grief Support Services: $5k → 16%Church and Community Ministries of: $20k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
NY
OR
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ranch Hands Rescue

To provide a sanctuary for people and animals, founded on hope and healing for the long-term recovery of trauma victims, special needs animals, and male survivors of sex trafficking.

Animals
2
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
3
Blue Waters Dog Rescue

We are a non-profit organization dedicated to helping animals in need. Our focus is on rescuing and rehabilitating animals. We provide the full curriculum of care for each dog rescued, This includes: shelter, food, spaying & neutering,…

Animals
4
Shepherds of Independence

To provide shelter, plus care, that meets physical, mental spiritual and social needs, while fostering dignity and independence in an affordable, warm, home-like atmosphere, to the mentally and physically challenged, to the displaced or…

Human Services
5
Home for Homeless Women
—
6
Bethany House Abuse Shelter Inc

Bethany house abuse shelter provides a safe haven and comprehensive services for victims of domestic violence and their children.

Human Services
7
Julia Greeley Home Inc

Julia greeley home, inc. serves single unaccompanied women in the denver metro area between the ages of 18 and 64 who are struggling with chronic or repeated homelessness. the program fulfills existing gaps between overnight short term…

Housing & Shelter
8
Womens Recovery ServicesA Unique Place

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction for women in a safe residential setting, allowing them and their young children to live together while learning the life skills necessary to become strong, responsible contributors in their…

—
9
Domestic Violence Sexual Assault Center Inc

Our mission is to provide compassionate support, resources, and advocacy for victims of violent crime. we are dedicated to empowering children, teens and adults in their journey to healing by offering a safe place, emotional care, and the…

Human Services
10
Hope Ridge Recovery Inc

Provide safe haven for recovering women

Health
11
2nd Chance Ranch and Rescue

Sanctuary for abused or abandoned animals

Animals
12
Good Samaritan Mission Inc

To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is My Sisters Place Inc; the most unlike its peers is Grace Farm Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
23/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Bend United Methodist Church: $225,000 · OtherBend United Methodist ChurchFirst Church of Christ Scientist Be: $150,000 · OtherFirst Church of Christ Scientist BeMidway Baptist Church of North Texa: $35,000 · OtherMidway Baptist Church of North TexaThe Shelby County Board of Educatio: $30,000 · Other+18 more: $210,063 · Other+18 moreWOMAN Inc: $75,000 · HealthWOMAN IncWHITE BIRD CLINIC: $40,000 · HealthWHITE BIRD CLINICSTARTING POINT FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · HealthSTARTING POINT FOUND…MAGIC MOMENTS: $20,000 · HealthMAGIC MOMENTSColorado Gynecologic Cancer Alliance: $20,000 · HealthColorado Gynecologic…NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $20,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SC…THE BEACON HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF SAN PEDRO: $10,000 · HealthLOOKING GLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $32,455 · Human ServicesLOOKING GLASS C…ALABAMA SHERIFFS' YOUTH RANCHES INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesALABAMA SHERIFF…CHURCH AND COMMUNITY MINISTRIES OF THE SHELBY BAPTIST ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · Human ServicesCHURCH AND COMM…Kings Home Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesKings Home IncFREE WILL BAPTIST CHILDRENS HO: $20,000 · Human ServicesFREE WILL BAPTI…GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR …BLUE SKY THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND RESPITE: $10,000 · Human ServicesBLUE SKY THERAP…PEST Relief International Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesPEST Relief Int…COMMUNITY GRIEF SUPPORT SERVICE: $5,000 · Human ServicesHUMANE SOCIETY OF SHELBY COUNTY: $20,000 · AnimalsTWO BY TWO RESCUE LEAGUE: $10,000 · AnimalsTURTLE MOUNTAIN ANIMAL RESCUE: $10,000 · AnimalsOPHELIA'S PLACE: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentSpecial Equestrians Inc: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsTHREE HOTS & A COT: $20,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$650,063Health$205,000Human Services$147,455Animals$40,000Youth Development$30,000Recreation & Sports$20,000Housing & Shelter$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOMAN Inc: $75,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetWHITE BIRD CLINIC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLOOKING GLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $32,455 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOPHELIA'S PLACE: $30,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetALABAMA SHERIFFS' YOUTH RANCHES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSpecial Equestrians Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetCHURCH AND COMMUNITY MINISTRIES OF THE SHELBY BAPTIST ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSTARTING POINT FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 47% of budgetTHREE HOTS & A COT: $20,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetMAGIC MOMENTS: $20,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetColorado Gynecologic Cancer Alliance: $20,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetWorking Wardrobes For A New Start: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKings Home Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SHELBY COUNTY: $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetThe Monarch School Monarch Institute for Neurological Diff: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMy Sisters Place Inc: $11,035 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE SKY THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND RESPITE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN RAPTOR PROGRAM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE BEACON HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF SAN PEDRO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTWO BY TWO RESCUE LEAGUE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetPEST Relief International Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetTURTLE MOUNTAIN ANIMAL RESCUE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAubrey Education Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY GRIEF SUPPORT SERVICE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Daniel Foundation…The Community Foundat…Alabama Power Foundat…Community Food Bank o…Protective Life Found…The Oregon Community …Edward Jones Foundati…Enterprise Holdings F…Network for GoodJpmorgan Chase Founda…Paypal Charitable Giv…Morgan Stanley Global…
The Daniel Foundation of AlabamaAL19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Community Food Bank of Central Alabama · Protective Life Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Network for Good · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Guthrie Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Guthrie Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • White Bird Clinic: 29% of income from government
  • Ophelia's Place: 22% of income from government
  • Looking Glass Community Services: 18% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Guthrie’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home