· Private foundation
Greenfish Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k29 grants · $139k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $95k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEXT DOOR INC | $15,295 |
| HOOD RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC | $15,045 |
| HOOD RIVER VALLEY PARKS & RECREATION FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| IMMIGRATION COUNSELING SERVICE INC | $10,000 |
| PORTLAND IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION | $10,000 |
| OREGON FOOD BANK | $10,000 |
| WESTSIDE ELEMENTARY PTO | $10,000 |
| PROVIDENCE HOOD RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| ONE COMMUNITY HEALTH LA CLINICA DEL CARINO FAMILY HEALTH | $9,838 |
| COLUMBIA ARTS | $7,500 |
| HELPING HANDS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC | $7,500 |
| GORGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| WASHINGTON GORGE ACTION PROGRAMS | $7,500 |
| MID-COLUMBIA COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC | $7,500 |
| COLUMBIA GORGE CASA | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
32 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HRHOOD RIVER COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDAT4× · 2022–2025 · $48k · revenue ×24
- TNTHE NEXT DOOR INC4× · 2022–2025 · $41k · revenue +60%
- CGCOLUMBIA GORGE CASA3× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- COCITY OF HOOD RIVERone grant, 2024 · $15k
- UWUNITED WAY OF THE COLUMBIA GORGEgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +49%
- MVMID VALLEY ELEMENTARY PTOone grant, 2023 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Columbia Gorge Humane Society is committed to promoting healthy, safe and lifelong relationships between people and their pets through sustainable programs of education, adoption and spay/neutering. We will endeavor to fight for the abused…
To conserve, enhance and protect the quality and ecological integrity of the watersheds by providing a cooperative forum to promote and facilitate integrated watershed management.
Columbia insights mission is to inform and inspire readers with original, balanced journalism about environmental issues affecting the pacific northwest with a special focus on the columbia river basin.
To sustain and improve the hood river watershed through education, cooperaton, and stewardship, and work collaboratively with local governments, agencies, tribal nations, community group and landowners. (see schedule o for full statement)
Providing legal aid to the environment by providing legal services to conservation organizations, community groups, native american tribes, and individuals working to protect and sustain the pacific northwest's natural legacy.
The Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council is a local nonprofit organization that strives to enhance and restore habitat for fish and wildlife our community and for future generations. Our Board of Directors consists of seven members with…
To promote stewardship of the Crooked River Watershed and its resources and to ensure sustainable watershed health, functions, and uses for optimal conservation and benefit.
Management of County's Watersheds
The North Fork John Day Watershed Council has been organized for scientific, charitable, and educational purposes in order to plan, develop, and implement projects and actions that help protect the ecology of the North and Middle Forks of…
Coquille watershed association (coqwa) works collaboratively with communities and landowners to develop and implement voluntary watershed restoration, enhancement, and community engagement activities that promote healthy and resilient…
Friends of the Anacortes Community Forest Lands is dedicated to the preservation, care, and enjoyment of the Anacortes Community Forest Lands.
Our mission is to help herding dogs who are abandoned, neglected and abused or simply in the wrong home into a loving appropriate home.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hood River Senior Citizens Inc and the most unlike its peers is Western Antique Aeroplane & Automobile Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOOD RIVER COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDAT ↗
- Who funds THE NEXT DOOR INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON GORGE ACTION PROGRAMS ↗
- Who funds GORGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Mid-Columbia Community Action Council ↗
- Who funds HELPING HANDS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA GORGE CASA ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA ARTS ↗
- Who funds Columbia Riverkeeper ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRATION COUNSELING SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA GORGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FISH Food Bank ↗
- Who funds Hood River Valley Parks and Rec Foundation ↗
- Who funds HOOD RIVER SENIOR CITIZENS INC ↗
- Who funds HOOD RIVER COUNTY CHRISTMAS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds HOOD RIVER COUNTY LIBRARY FDTN ↗
- Who funds GORGE GROWN FOOD NETWORK ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA GORGE CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds MID-COLUMBIA CHILDRENS COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds ARTS IN EDUCATION OF THE GORGE ↗
- Who funds CULTURESEED INC ↗
- Who funds THRIVE HOOD RIVER ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE HOOD RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of the Columbia Gorge Land Trust ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE ↗
- Who funds ADOPT A DOG INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of the Columbia Gorge ↗
- Who funds CRATES POINT ↗
- Who funds ROWENA WILDLIFE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds FISH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ford Family Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Providence Health & Services - Oregon · Gorge Community Foundation · The Stebbins Fund Inc · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Collins Foundation · United Way of the Columbia Gorge · Columbia Gorge Health Council · Bruce and Mary Stevenson Foundation Inc · Wy'East Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Greenfish Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mid-Columbia Childrens Council Inc — 91% of income from government
- Helping Hands Against Violence Inc — 48% of income from government
- Mid-Columbia Community Action Council — 43% of income from government
- The Next Door Inc — 39% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- Immigration Counseling Service Inc — 20% of income from government
- Columbia Gorge Childrens Advocacy Center — 12% of income from government
- Columbia Arts — 8% of income from government
- Columbia Gorge Casa — 1% of income from government
- Columbia Riverkeeper — 1% of income from government
- Crates Point — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.