Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bruce and Mary Stevenson Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$197k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$1.7MArts & Culture$645kHealth$205kHuman Services$151kPhilanthropy$105kFood & Nutrition$66kCrime & Legal$61kAnimals$49kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $17k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $180k
$8,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARYHILL MUSEUM OF ART$80,000
PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$50,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$50,000
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION$8,000
SKYLINE FOUNDATION$5,000
SKYLINE FOUNDATION$2,000
FREEDOM FOUNDATION$1,000
WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $113k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%ELIZABETH STONE HOUSE: $1k → 16%WASHINGTON GOREGE ACTION PROGRAM: $10k → 10%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $10k → 8%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $10k → 8%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $10k → 8%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $5k → 8%ELIZABETH STONE HOUSE: $1k → 16%HOOD RIVER VALLEY ADULT CENTER: $10k → 10%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $5k → 8%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $1k → 8%FRIENDLY HOUSE: $10k → 12%FRIENDLY HOUSE: $10k → 12%FRIENDLY HOUSE: $10k → 12%FRIENDLY HOUSE: $10k → 12%FRIENDLY HOUSE: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
WA
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
CA
MD
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.5M · 45 repeat orgs$473k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +80% since the first grant, against -7% for the ones you funded once.

45 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
55

Total granted

$2.5M
$473k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
-7%

Still filing today

58%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MARYHILL MUSEUM OF ART
    5× · 2020–2025 · $460k · revenue +147%
  • PU
    PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $100k · revenue +112%
  • WS
    WHITE SALMON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $62k · revenue +110%

Funded once

  • MM
    MARYHILL MUSEUM
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • MM
    MARYHILL MUSEUM ENDOWMENT FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • HR
    HOOD RIVER COUNTY LIBRARY FDTN
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
2
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

3
Portland State University Foundation

Portland state university foundation is responsible for raising and managing private resources to advance psu's priorities and mission to be a leading urban university.

4
Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences

Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences educates and trains health care professionals emphasizing service among rural and medically under-served communities throughout the Northwest.

Education
5
Portland Business Alliance

To ensure economic prosperity in the portland region by providing strong leadership, partnership, and programs that encourage business growth and vitality.

Community Improvement
6
Museum of Northwest Art

The museum of northwest art collects, preserves, interprets and exhibits art created in the pacific northwest, supports artists, and strives to integrate art into the lives of all people. the museum is free and open to the public seven…

Arts & Culture
7
Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council

The Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council is a local nonprofit organization that strives to enhance and restore habitat for fish and wildlife our community and for future generations. Our Board of Directors consists of seven members with…

Environment
8
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
9
Seattle University

Seattle University is dedicated to educating the whole person, to professional formation, and to empowering leaders for a just and humane world.

10
Friends of the Columbia Gorge

Ensuring the gorge remains a vibrant, living place wondrous, wild, and accessible for all is at the core of what we do. friends of the columbia gorge works to protect, preserve, and steward the columbia gorge for future generations.

11
Senior Life Resources Northwest

To preserve and enhance the quality of life at home, with dignity and care.

Human Services
12
Oregon Research Institute

Oregon research institute is an independent behavioral sciences research center dedicated to understanding human behavior and improving the quality of human life through the prevention and treatment of health, educational, and social…

Social Science

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Islandwood and the most unlike its peers is Stonehouse Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLocal History MuseumsUnited Way AffiliatesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Domestic Violence ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsSenior Support ServicesElementary Literacy TutoringAnimal Rescue and ShelterFood Banks and PantriesPublic Library OperationsEnvironmental Conservation …Pregnancy Support ServicesIndependent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr18%37%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr15%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr18%11%20–35yr13%46%35–55yr15%35%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/41
the rest of the field
12%
4,745/38,927

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
29/41
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BILLINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL — $943,200 · OtherBILLINGS MIDDLE SCHOOLSKYLINE FOUNDATION — $87,500 · Other+72 more — $884,535 · Other+72 moreHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $300,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGEPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 · EducationPRAGER UNIVERSITY …WHITE SALMON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $62,250 · EducationWHITE SALMON VALLE…HOOD RIVER COUNTY LIBRARY FDTN — $25,000 · Education+5 more — $44,500 · Education+5 moreMARYHILL MUSEUM OF ART — $460,000 · Arts & CultureMARYHILL MUSEUM OF…PERFORMING ARTS INITIATIVE — $40,000 · Arts & CulturePERFORMING ARTS IN…+3 more — $14,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDLY HOUSE INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesWARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC — $41,000 · Human ServicesHOOD RIVER SENIOR CITIZENS INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesUnited Help Ukraine Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON GORGE ACTION PROGRAMS — $10,000 · Human Services+1 more — $2,000 · Human ServicesPacific Legal Foundation — $43,000 · Crime & LegalTHE NEXT DOOR INC — $20,000 · Crime & LegalWOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $16,000 · AnimalsTHE OREGON ZOO FOUNDATION — $15,000 · AnimalsOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY — $6,000 · AnimalsTHE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $5,000 · AnimalsFISH — $20,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE — $20,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,915,235Education$531,750Arts & Culture$514,000Human Services$123,000Crime & Legal$63,000Animals$42,000Philanthropy$40,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBILLINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL — $943,200 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetMARYHILL MUSEUM OF ART — $460,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $300,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSKYLINE FOUNDATION — $87,500 over 6y, 12% of budgetWHITE SALMON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $62,250 over 3y, 21% of budgetEDISON HIGH SCHOOL — $54,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDLY HOUSE INC — $50,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation — $43,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC — $41,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPERFORMING ARTS INITIATIVE — $40,000 over 4y, 34% of budgetHOOD RIVER COUNTY LIBRARY FDTN — $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTAKE THE LEAD INC — $24,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetFISH — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE NEXT DOOR INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE — $20,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetWOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $16,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OREGON ZOO FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHORIZON CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $12,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBALLARD FOOD BANK — $11,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMaris Place — $11,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOOD RIVER SENIOR CITIZENS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetDance Fremont — $10,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetUnited Help Ukraine Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORT VANCOUVER REGIONAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWASHINGTON GORGE ACTION PROGRAMS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLITERACY SOURCE A COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER — $7,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLIFEWORKS NW — $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISLANDWOOD — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA ARTS — $3,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSTONEHOUSE INC — $3,000 over 3y, 46% of budgetROXBURY STONE HOUSE INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORTLAND BAROQUE ORCHESTRA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLUMBIA LAND TRUST — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BILLINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL
  • Who funds MARYHILL MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SKYLINE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WHITE SALMON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds EDISON HIGH SCHOOL
  • Who funds FRIENDLY HOUSE INC
  • Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation
  • Who funds WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC
  • Who funds PERFORMING ARTS INITIATIVE
  • Who funds HOOD RIVER COUNTY LIBRARY FDTN
  • Who funds Black Mamas Matter Alliance Inc
  • Who funds TAKE THE LEAD INC
  • Who funds FISH
  • Who funds THE NEXT DOOR INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE
  • Who funds WOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds THE OREGON ZOO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HORIZON CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
  • Who funds BALLARD FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Maris Place

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stevenson Campbell FoundationWA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stevenson Campbell Foundation · Greenfish Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Swigert Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Rose E Tucker Charitable Trust · Juan Young Trust · The Autzen Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Gorge Community Foundation · The Firstenburg Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bruce and Mary Stevenson Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 90%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 8%
  • The Next Door Inc39% of income from government
  • Roxbury Stone House Inc29% of income from government
  • Columbia Arts8% of income from government
  • Lifeworks Nw8% of income from government
  • Warrior Canine Connection Inc5% of income from government
  • Friendly House Inc3% of income from government
  • Portland Baroque Orchestra1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bruce and Mary Stevenson Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Bruce and Mary Stevenson Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph