· Private foundation
Greenbaum Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GRANITE STATE AMBASSADORS | $5,000 |
| ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| CAL RIPKIN FOUNDATION | $4,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE IDF | $4,000 |
| LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA | $3,000 |
| KLS COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY | $3,000 |
| VEHICLES FOR CHANGE | $2,500 |
| JECIMY SCHOOL FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| ISRAEL BASEBALL AMERICAS | $1,800 |
| ASSOCIATED JEWISH FEDERATION OF BAL | $1,800 |
| GATEWAY MARYLAND | $1,500 |
| NEW LONDON HISTORIAL SOCIETY | $1,000 |
| YMCA CAMP CONISTON | $1,000 |
| LIVING IN RECOVERY | $1,000 |
| TBW CHARITIES INC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
39 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KCKLS COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY3× · 2022–2025 · $13k · revenue +116%
- GSGRANITE STATE AMBASSADORS INC3× · 2022–2025 · $9k · revenue +9%
- ADALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC2× · 2023–2025 · $8k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- MWMT WASHINGTON PEDI HOSPITALone grant, 2023 · $3k
- SCSECOND CHANCE WILDLIFE CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +30%
- FOFRIENDS OF ALL CRITTERS AT SHELTERS INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +27%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Maryland Spca Inc and the most unlike its peers is Marys Army Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KLS COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds GRANITE STATE AMBASSADORS INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds VEHICLES FOR CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds TOWSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HARFORD FAMILY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds New London Historical Society ↗
- Who funds TBW CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds NEW LONDON BARN PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE JEMICY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds The New London Hospital Association Inc ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR ALL INC ↗
- Who funds LIVING IN RECOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds CLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL BASEBALL AMERICAS INC ↗
- Who funds ADAMAH INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds PATHFINDERS FOR AUTISM ↗
- Who funds MARYS ARMY INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND CHANCE WILDLIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ALL CRITTERS AT SHELTERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds THE MARYLAND SPCA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · Edward St John Foundation Inc · The Marion I & Henry J Knott Foundation Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The Joseph Meyerhoff Fund Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Louis & Phyllis Friedman Foundation Inc · Mary Jean and Oliver Travers Foundation Inc · Campbell Foundation Inc · Herbert Bearman Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Greenbaum Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Vehicles for Change Inc — 16% of income from government
- Harford Family House Inc — 14% of income from government
- Adamah Inc — 10% of income from government
- Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
- St John's College — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.