Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gordon Ross Medical Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$381k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.3MEducation$514kScience & Tech$286kEmployment$66kHuman Services$66kRecreation & Sports$26k
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $318k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$47,625
CITY OF HOPE$47,625
CALIF INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$47,625
HUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH FDN$47,625
Individual grant recipient$22,500
JDRF$22,500
JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER$16,000
USC ADVANCEMENT GIFT SERVICES$16,000
COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM$10,000
CASA PACIFICA$10,000
ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION$10,000
THE DIATRIBE FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CAMP CONRAD CHINNOCK$7,000
CAL STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLAND$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 88% of grant dollars ($2.0M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 12% that went abroad ($281k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CASA PACIFICA: $10k → 10%CASA PACIFICA: $10k → 10%CASA PACIFICA: $10k → 10%CASA PACIFICA: $10k → 10%CASA PACIFICA: $9k → 10%CASA PACIFICA: $8k → 10%CASA PACIFICA: $4k → 10%CASA PACIFICA: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
NY
MA
OR
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
AR
GA
FL

Beyond the US: 12% of all-years giving ($281k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$281k · 9 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 32 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
2

Total granted

$2.2M
$15k

Still filing today

47%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationEmploymentHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $87k · revenue +68%
  • SL
    ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +144%
  • MDRC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $66k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • UK
    USC KECK MEDICINE OF USC
    one grant, 2024 · $12k
  • YO
    YMCA OF HOT SPRINGS ARKANSAS
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
2
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
3
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
4
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
5
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
8
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
9
American Diabetes Association

The mission of the American Diabetes Association is to prevent and cure diabetes and to improve the lives of all people affected by diabetes.

Health
10
Diabetes Action Research and Education Foundation

Diabetes action research and education foundation is committed to the prevention and treatment of diabetes and to the funding of innovative, promising research aimed at finding a cure for diabetes and diabetes-related complications.

Health
11
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
12
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Beyond Type 1; the most unlike its peers is Mdrc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CALIF INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $285,750 · OtherCALIF INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYCITY OF HOPE: $285,250 · OtherCITY OF HOPEHUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH FDN: $281,200 · OtherHUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH FDNST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $281,200 · OtherST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $103,125 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $86,187 · Other+14 more: $313,950 · Other+14 moreCOMMUNITY MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM: $87,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY MEMORIAL …ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · HealthST LUKE'S WOOD RIVE…JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC: $57,875 · HealthJOSLIN DIABETES CEN…Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation: $56,188 · HealthSanta Barbara Cotta…BREAKTHROUGH T1D: $37,250 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1DThe diaTribe Foundation: $28,500 · HealthThe diaTribe Founda…CHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Health+4 more: $29,000 · Health+4 moreVENTURA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $43,625 · EducationBoise State University Foundation Inc: $35,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $16,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationMDRC: $66,375 · EmploymentCasa Pacifica Centers for Children & Families: $63,325 · Human ServicesGALES CREEK CAMP FOUNDATION: $10,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,636,662Health$385,813Education$99,625Employment$66,375Human Services$63,325Recreation & Sports$10,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM: $87,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMDRC: $66,375 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCasa Pacifica Centers for Children & Families: $63,325 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC: $57,875 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSanta Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation: $56,188 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetVENTURA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $43,625 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $37,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBoise State University Foundation Inc: $35,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe diaTribe Foundation: $28,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $16,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGALES CREEK CAMP FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTAKING CONTROL OF YOUR DIABETES DBA TCOYD: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBEYOND TYPE 1: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MDRC ↗
  • Who funds Casa Pacifica Centers for Children & Families ↗
  • Who funds JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds VENTURA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds Boise State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds The diaTribe Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GALES CREEK CAMP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TAKING CONTROL OF YOUR DIABETES DBA TCOYD ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND TYPE 1 ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN12.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gordon Ross Medical Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gordon Ross Medical Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Joslin Diabetes Center Inc: 35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gordon Ross Medical’s filings →

More from the funding graph