Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gordon Ross Medical Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$381k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$1.3MEducation$514kScience & Tech$286kEmployment$66kHuman Services$66kRecreation & Sports$26k
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $318k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$47,625
CALIF INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$47,625
HUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH FDN$47,625
CITY OF HOPE$47,625
Individual grant recipient$22,500
JDRF$22,500
JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER$16,000
USC ADVANCEMENT GIFT SERVICES$16,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM$10,000
ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION$10,000
THE DIATRIBE FOUNDATION$10,000
CASA PACIFICA$10,000
CAL STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLAND$7,000
VENTURA COLLEGE FOUNDATION$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving — 88% of grant dollars ($2.0M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 12% that went abroad ($281k) is mapped below.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CASA PACIFICA: $10k → 10%CASA PACIFICA: $10k → 10%CASA PACIFICA: $10k → 10%CASA PACIFICA: $10k → 10%CASA PACIFICA: $9k → 10%CASA PACIFICA: $8k → 10%CASA PACIFICA: $4k → 10%CASA PACIFICA: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
NY
MA
OR
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
AR
GA
FL

Beyond the US — 12% of all-years giving ($281k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$281k · 9 grants

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 32 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
2

Total granted

$2.2M
$15k

Still filing today

47%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationEmploymentHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $87k · revenue +68%
  • SL
    ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +98%
  • MDRC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $66k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • UK
    USC KECK MEDICINE OF USC
    one grant, 2024 · $12k
  • YO
    YMCA OF HOT SPRINGS ARKANSAS
    one grant, 2019 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
2
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
3
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
4
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
5
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
8
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
9
American Diabetes Association

The mission of the American Diabetes Association is to prevent and cure diabetes and to improve the lives of all people affected by diabetes.

Health
10
Diabetes Action Research and Education Foundation

Diabetes action research and education foundation is committed to the prevention and treatment of diabetes and to the funding of innovative, promising research aimed at finding a cure for diabetes and diabetes-related complications.

Health
11
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
12
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Beyond Type 1 and the most unlike its peers is Mdrc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CALIF INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $285,750 · OtherCALIF INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYCITY OF HOPE — $285,250 · OtherCITY OF HOPEHUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH FDN — $281,200 · OtherHUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH FDNST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $281,200 · OtherST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $103,125 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $86,187 · Other+14 more — $313,950 · Other+14 moreCOMMUNITY MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM — $87,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY MEMORIAL …ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 · HealthST LUKE'S WOOD RIVE…JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC — $57,875 · HealthJOSLIN DIABETES CEN…Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation — $56,188 · HealthSanta Barbara Cotta…BREAKTHROUGH T1D — $37,250 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1DThe diaTribe Foundation — $28,500 · HealthThe diaTribe Founda…CHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Health+4 more — $29,000 · Health+4 moreVENTURA COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $43,625 · EducationBoise State University Foundation Inc — $35,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $16,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationMDRC — $66,375 · EmploymentCasa Pacifica Centers for Children & Families — $63,325 · Human ServicesGALES CREEK CAMP FOUNDATION — $10,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,636,662Health$385,813Education$99,625Employment$66,375Human Services$63,325Recreation & Sports$10,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM — $87,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMDRC — $66,375 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCasa Pacifica Centers for Children & Families — $63,325 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC — $57,875 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSanta Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation — $56,188 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetVENTURA COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $43,625 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $37,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBoise State University Foundation Inc — $35,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe diaTribe Foundation — $28,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $16,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGALES CREEK CAMP FOUNDATION — $10,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTAKING CONTROL OF YOUR DIABETES DBA TCOYD — $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBEYOND TYPE 1 — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM
  • Who funds ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MDRC
  • Who funds Casa Pacifica Centers for Children & Families
  • Who funds JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC
  • Who funds Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation
  • Who funds VENTURA COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D
  • Who funds Boise State University Foundation Inc
  • Who funds The diaTribe Foundation
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GALES CREEK CAMP FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TAKING CONTROL OF YOUR DIABETES DBA TCOYD
  • Who funds BEYOND TYPE 1
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN12.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gordon Ross Medical Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 35%
  • Joslin Diabetes Center Inc35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph