Skip to content
Go Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Go Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$320k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.0MHuman Services$562kFood & Nutrition$430kHealth$313kHousing & Shelter$155kYouth Development$95kInternational$58kEducation$48kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $275k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
International Living Streams$25,000
Church Under the Bridge$20,000
Christ for the Nations$20,000
San Antonio Rescue Mission$20,000
I Can Still Shine Foundation$20,000
HIS Bridge Builders$20,000
Hill Country Daily Bread$20,000
Ft Worth HOPE Center$20,000
Harvesters Reaching the Nations$20,000
Boysville$15,000
Arms of Hope$15,000
Center for Medical Humanities & Ethics$15,000
Helping Hands Food Pantry$15,000
Agape International Missions$10,000
Houston Pregnancy Help Center$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $428k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Lake Travis Crisis Ministry: $15k → 10%Arms of Hope: $15k → 12%Houston Pregnancy Help Center: $10k → 16%Lake Travis Crisis Ministry: $10k → 10%Arms of Hope: $15k → 12%Houston Pregnancy Help Center: $10k → 16%Lake Travis Crisis Ministry: $10k → 10%Arms of Hope: $13k → 12%Houston Pregnancy Help Center: $10k → 16%Lake Travis Crisis Ministry: $10k → 10%Arms of Hope: $13k → 12%Houston Pregnancy Help Center: $10k → 16%Gries Family Charity: $3k → 9%Lake Travis Crisis Ministry: $8k → 10%Arms of Hope: $13k → 12%Lake Travis Crisis Ministry: $5k → 10%Arms of Hope: $13k → 12%Lake Travis Crisis Ministry: $5k → 10%Arms of Hope: $10k → 12%Arms of Hope: $10k → 12%Arms of Hope: $8k → 12%Ft Worth HOPE Center: $20k → 11%Ft Worth HOPE Center: $20k → 11%Ft Worth HOPE Center: $15k → 11%Ft Worth HOPE Center: $15k → 11%Ft Worth HOPE Center: $15k → 11%Ft Worth HOPE Center: $13k → 11%Ft Worth HOPE Center: $10k → 11%Boysville: $20k → 16%Boysville: $15k → 16%Boysville: $15k → 16%Boysville: $15k → 16%Boysville: $15k → 16%Boysville: $13k → 16%Boysville: $10k → 16%Boysville: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 35 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
7

Total granted

$2.7M
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+73%

Still filing today

46%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionFood & NutritionEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD
    9× · 2017–2025 · $178k · revenue +39%
  • IL
    International Living Streams
    9× · 2017–2025 · $165k · revenue +208%
  • HB
    HIS BRIDGEBUILDERS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $135k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • MM
    Missions Ministry & Media
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • NE
    NORTH EAST BIBLE CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • IC
    I can still Shine Foundaton
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bridge of Hope Ministries Inc

Provide safe & loving home for children

Human Services
2
Border Missions

We distribute food, clothing, and toiletry items to the poor and needy along the TX-Mexico Border as well as ministering to their spiritual needs through services, health programs, and other humanitarian efforts.

Religion
3
Faith Crusades Ministries Home

Provide housing, food and rehabilitation

Religion
4
Cross Made Me Ministries
Religion
5
Under the Bridge Ministries Inc

We are a faith based non-profit organization that serves and cares for members in our community experiencing homelessness in the East Lancaster corridor of Fort Worth, TX. Every Sunday evening, we provide warm meals, drinks, clothes, hair…

Human Services
6
Hilo Ministries Inc

To be an organization where people are excited to assist in the love and care of the orphan and those in foster care, as well as providing temporary housing and training for those in the worldwide missionary field.

Human Services
7
Refuge for Prodigals International Bible Ministries Inc
Religion
8
House of Prayer for All Nations

Church ministry

Religion
9
Christian Faith Ministry

Feeding the hungry

Human Services
10
Samaria Global Ministries

Religious and counselling

—
11
Hands of Mercy International

To build individual houses for needy families in Mexico and direct them to Mexican pastors to further the gospel of Jesus Christ.

International
12
Gifts From God Ministry

Hope And Help Center. Hope by teaching the Bible, focusing on Jesus Christ. Help by working with community partners to provide services to our members and community residents.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arms of Hope; the most unlike its peers is Missions Ministry and Media Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRIST FOR THE NATIONS: $227,500 · OtherCHRIST FOR THE NATIONSHarvesters Reaching the Nations: $172,500 · OtherHarvesters Reaching the NationsI Can Still Shine Foundation: $142,500 · OtherI Can Still Shine FoundationCHURCH UNDER THE BRIDGE: $141,000 · OtherCHURCH UNDER THE BRIDGECenter for Medical Humanities & Ethics: $137,500 · OtherCenter for Medical Humanities & EthicsSan Antonio Rescue Mission: $112,500 · OtherSan Antonio Rescue MissionFoundations for Laity Renewal: $112,500 · OtherFoundations for Laity RenewalALPHA HOME INC: $105,000 · OtherALPHA HOME INCHOPE CENTER INC: $72,500 · Other+19 more: $439,500 · Other+19 moreBOYSVILLE INC: $107,500 · Human ServicesBOYSVILLE INCARMS OF HOPE: $107,500 · Human ServicesARMS OF HOPEFORT WORTH HOPE CENTER THE HOPE CENTER: $107,500 · Human ServicesFORT WORTH HOPE CE…Houston Pregnancy Help Center Inc: $70,000 · Human ServicesHouston Pregnancy …LAKE TRAVIS CRISIS MINISTRIES: $62,500 · Human ServicesLAKE TRAVIS CRISIS…+2 more: $4,604 · Human ServicesInternational Living Streams: $165,000 · ReligionInternational…HIS BRIDGEBUILDERS INC: $135,000 · ReligionHIS BRIDGEBUI…SAN ANTONIO MARRIAGE INITIATIVE: $25,000 · ReligionSAN ANTONIO M…HILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD: $177,500 · Food & NutritionBAXTER FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · HealthSUNSHINE COTTAGE SCHOOL FOR DEAF CHILDREN: $47,500 · EducationHOPE HOME MINISTRY: $22,500 · Housing & ShelterCFPO-PAL INC: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,663,000Human Services$459,604Religion$325,000Food & Nutrition$177,500Health$50,000Education$47,500Housing & Shelter$22,500Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD: $177,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetInternational Living Streams: $165,000 over 9y, 9.1% of budgetHIS BRIDGEBUILDERS INC: $135,000 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetSan Antonio Rescue Mission: $112,500 over 9y, 11% of budgetBOYSVILLE INC: $107,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetARMS OF HOPE: $107,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetFORT WORTH HOPE CENTER THE HOPE CENTER: $107,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetALPHA HOME INC: $105,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetHouston Pregnancy Help Center Inc: $70,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetLAKE TRAVIS CRISIS MINISTRIES: $62,500 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetBAXTER FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSUNSHINE COTTAGE SCHOOL FOR DEAF CHILDREN: $47,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWings of a Butterfly: $35,000 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetSAN ANTONIO MARRIAGE INITIATIVE: $25,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetMISSIONS MINISTRY AND MEDIA FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 4y, 88% of budgetHOPE HOME MINISTRY: $22,500 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetAgape International Missions: $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCFPO-PAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD ↗
  • Who funds International Living Streams ↗
  • Who funds HIS BRIDGEBUILDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds San Antonio Rescue Mission ↗
  • Who funds BOYSVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARMS OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH HOPE CENTER THE HOPE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Houston Pregnancy Help Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds LAKE TRAVIS CRISIS MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds BAXTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNSHINE COTTAGE SCHOOL FOR DEAF CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Wings of a Butterfly ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO MARRIAGE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds MISSIONS MINISTRY AND MEDIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOME MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds Agape International Missions ↗
  • Who funds CFPO-PAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area Foun…Harvey E Najim Charit…Methodist Healthcare …The Moody FoundationPryor Myra Stafford C…Christian Community F…Communities Foundatio…Shell USA Company Fou…Greater Houston Commu…Aetna Foundation IncNatl Christian Charit…The Blackbaud Giving …
San Antonio Area FoundationTX21× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · The Moody Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Go Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Go Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Go’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home