· Private foundation
Go Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $275k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| International Living Streams | $25,000 |
| Hill Country Daily Bread | $20,000 |
| Ft Worth HOPE Center | $20,000 |
| San Antonio Rescue Mission | $20,000 |
| I Can Still Shine Foundation | $20,000 |
| HIS Bridge Builders | $20,000 |
| Harvesters Reaching the Nations | $20,000 |
| Christ for the Nations | $20,000 |
| Church Under the Bridge | $20,000 |
| Arms of Hope | $15,000 |
| Boysville | $15,000 |
| Center for Medical Humanities & Ethics | $15,000 |
| Helping Hands Food Pantry | $15,000 |
| Houston Pregnancy Help Center | $10,000 |
| Foundations for Laity Renewal | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $428k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
35 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HCHILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD9× · 2017–2025 · $178k · revenue +39%
- ILInternational Living Streams9× · 2017–2025 · $165k · revenue +208%
- HBHIS BRIDGEBUILDERS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $135k · revenue +88%
Funded once
- MMMissions Ministry & Mediaone grant, 2017 · $10k
- ICI can still Shine Foundatonone grant, 2018 · $8k
- NENORTH EAST BIBLE CHURCHone grant, 2021 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide safe & loving home for children
We distribute food, clothing, and toiletry items to the poor and needy along the TX-Mexico Border as well as ministering to their spiritual needs through services, health programs, and other humanitarian efforts.
Provide housing, food and rehabilitation
We are a faith based non-profit organization that serves and cares for members in our community experiencing homelessness in the East Lancaster corridor of Fort Worth, TX. Every Sunday evening, we provide warm meals, drinks, clothes, hair…
To be an organization where people are excited to assist in the love and care of the orphan and those in foster care, as well as providing temporary housing and training for those in the worldwide missionary field.
Church ministry
Feeding the hungry
Religious and counselling
To build individual houses for needy families in Mexico and direct them to Mexican pastors to further the gospel of Jesus Christ.
Hope And Help Center. Hope by teaching the Bible, focusing on Jesus Christ. Help by working with community partners to provide services to our members and community residents.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arms of Hope and the most unlike its peers is Missions Ministry and Media Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD ↗
- Who funds International Living Streams ↗
- Who funds HIS BRIDGEBUILDERS INC ↗
- Who funds San Antonio Rescue Mission ↗
- Who funds FORT WORTH HOPE CENTER THE HOPE CENTER ↗
- Who funds ARMS OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds BOYSVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds ALPHA HOME INC ↗
- Who funds Houston Pregnancy Help Center Inc ↗
- Who funds LAKE TRAVIS CRISIS MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds BAXTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SUNSHINE COTTAGE SCHOOL FOR DEAF CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Wings of a Butterfly ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO MARRIAGE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds MISSIONS MINISTRY AND MEDIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE HOME MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds Agape International Missions ↗
- Who funds CFPO-PAL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · The Moody Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Go Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.