Skip to content
Go Humanity Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Go Humanity Inc

Uniting the humanist community in charitable and volunteer efforts, and advocating for compassionate action throughout the world.

$52k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Food & Nutrition$157kEnvironment$118kPublic Safety & Disaster$83kInternational$77kHuman Services$68kArts & Culture$43kEducation$42kHousing & Shelter$29kOther$0
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $32,676, the rows itemized in this filing. The $52,183 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $19,507 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
$10,076
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUMANISTS OF WEST FLORIDA$13,800
NORTH ORLANDO OASIS$10,076
AUSTIN AHTEISTS HELPING HOMEL$8,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%APOPO: $6k → 14%IGNITE: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
OH
CT
CA
CO
WV
MD
AZ
AR
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$253k · 6 repeat orgs$448k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against +61% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
36

Total granted

$253k
$424k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+61%

Still filing today

50%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’23
EnvironmentInternationalHuman ServicesEducationPublic Safety & DisasterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $83k · revenue +129%
  • B
    BakerRipley
    2× · 2017–2020 · $46k · revenue +89%
  • TT
    THE TANDANA FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $13k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • BF
    BOULDER FOOD RESCUEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue +59%
  • CG
    COMMON GROUND COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -4%
  • FI
    FLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $14k · revenue +81%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
2
Technoserve Inc

Technoserve's mission is to fight poverty by helping people build regenerative farms, businesses, and markets that increase incomes.

International
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
5
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
6
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
7
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
8
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
9
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
10
Nuru International

Nuru is a global collective that enables inclusive and sustainable prosperity by identifying communities at the stability tipping point, strengthening rural livelihoods and market systems, and fostering stabilizing connections that repair…

International
11
Rights and Resources Institute Inc

Rri's mission is to support local communities and indigenous peoples' struggles against poverty and marginalization by promoting greater global commitment and action towards policy, market, and legal reforms that secure their rights to…

Environment
12
Green Empowerment

Green empowerment works with local partners around the world to strengthen communities by delivering renewable energy and safe water.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mk Level Playing Field Institute; the most unlike its peers is Common Ground Community Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/40
Grantees still filing
28/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ECOVIVA NFP: $59,800 · OtherECOVIVA NFPPUEBLO A PUEBLO: $35,750 · OtherPUEBLO A PUEBLOCOMMON GROUND COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $20,111 · OtherCOMMON GROUND COMMUNITY CENTER INCAUSTIN AHTEISTS HELPING HOMEL: $16,800 · OtherAUSTIN AHTEISTS HELPING HOMELHUMANISTS OF WEST FLORIDA: $13,800 · OtherNORTH ORLANDO OASIS: $10,076 · OtherFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC: $13,750 · OtherThe Montrose Center: $10,000 · Other+14 more: $101,285 · Other+14 moreBOULDER FOOD RESCUE: $150,000 · Food & NutritionBOULDER FOOD RESCUEALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $82,500 · Public Safety & DisasterALL HANDS AND …WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP: $8,700 · Public Safety & DisasterWORLD BICYCLE …SKYTRUTH: $9,300 · EnvironmentSKYTRUTHLIGHTHAWK: $9,050 · EnvironmentLIGHTHAWKTREES WATER AND PEOPLE: $7,800 · EnvironmentTREES WAT…WHOLESOME WAVE INC: $7,250 · EnvironmentWHOLESOME…Global Green USA: $7,250 · EnvironmentGlobal Gr…Everybody Solar: $7,000 · EnvironmentEverybody…STAND: $5,750 · EnvironmentSTANDTREES FOR THE FUTURE INC: $5,500 · EnvironmentTREES FOR…BakerRipley: $45,500 · Human ServicesBakerRipl…APOPO US INC: $6,300 · Human ServicesAPOPO US …IGNITE: $5,500 · Human ServicesIGNITEMAIA: $9,100 · InternationalTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $8,700 · InternationalINKULULEKO INC: $6,300 · InternationalWATER FOR PEOPLE: $6,100 · InternationalKIVA MICROFUNDS: $5,917 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,246 · InternationalTHE TANDANA FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 · EducationWOMENS GLOBAL EDUCATION PROJECT: $8,000 · EducationPOINT FOUNDATION: $6,100 · Education
Other$281,372Food & Nutrition$150,000Public Safety & Disaster$91,200Environment$58,900Human Services$57,300International$41,363Education$26,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOULDER FOOD RESCUE: $150,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $82,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetECOVIVA NFP: $59,800 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetBakerRipley: $45,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPUEBLO A PUEBLO: $35,750 over 2y, 15% of budgetCOMMON GROUND COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $20,111 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC: $13,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TANDANA FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSKYTRUTH: $9,300 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMAIA: $9,100 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $9,050 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIGHTHAWK: $9,050 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S EQUITY COALITION: $8,750 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $8,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP: $8,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SENTENCING PROJECT: $8,550 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWOMENS GLOBAL EDUCATION PROJECT: $8,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWHOLESOME WAVE INC: $7,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGlobal Green USA: $7,250 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTRACE MEDIA INC: $7,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEverybody Solar: $7,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetMK LEVEL PLAYING FIELD INSTITUTE: $6,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAPOPO US INC: $6,300 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGlobeMed NFP: $6,300 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWATER FOR PEOPLE: $6,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOINT FOUNDATION: $6,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNational Center for Science Education: $6,100 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $6,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIVA MICROFUNDS: $5,917 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTAND: $5,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMy Sisters House: $5,750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTREES FOR THE FUTURE INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEARTS OF GOLD INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetIGNITE: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,246 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Globalgiving Foundati…Tides FoundationPledgeling FoundationImpactassetsincJpmorgan Chase Founda…Silicon Valley Commun…Seattle FoundationAbbVie FoundationGs Donor Advised Phil…National Philanthropi…The Chicago Community…Shell USA Company Fou…
Globalgiving Foundation IncDC18.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Globalgiving Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · Pledgeling Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Seattle Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Chicago Community Trust · Shell USA Company Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Go Humanity Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Go Humanity Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Squareone Villages: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Go Humanity Inc?

Find your warmest path to Go Humanity Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $20k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Go Humanity’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home