· Public charity
Go Humanity Inc
Uniting the humanist community in charitable and volunteer efforts, and advocating for compassionate action throughout the world.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $32,676 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $52,183 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $19,507 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HUMANISTS OF WEST FLORIDA | $13,800 |
| NORTH ORLANDO OASIS | $10,076 |
| AUSTIN AHTEISTS HELPING HOMEL | $8,800 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +75% since the first grant, against +61% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC2× · 2017–2019 · $83k · revenue +129%- BBakerRipley2× · 2017–2020 · $46k · revenue +89%
- TTTHE TANDANA FOUNDATION INC2× · 2019–2020 · $13k · revenue +75%
Funded once
- BFBOULDER FOOD RESCUEgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue +59%
- CGCOMMON GROUND COMMUNITY CENTER INCone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -4%
- FIFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $14k · revenue +81%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
Technoserve's mission is to fight poverty by helping people build regenerative farms, businesses, and markets that increase incomes.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…
To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.
Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.
See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.
Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…
Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.
Nuru is a global collective that enables inclusive and sustainable prosperity by identifying communities at the stability tipping point, strengthening rural livelihoods and market systems, and fostering stabilizing connections that repair…
Rri's mission is to support local communities and indigenous peoples' struggles against poverty and marginalization by promoting greater global commitment and action towards policy, market, and legal reforms that secure their rights to…
Green empowerment works with local partners around the world to strengthen communities by delivering renewable energy and safe water.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mk Level Playing Field Institute and the most unlike its peers is Common Ground Community Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOULDER FOOD RESCUE ↗
- Who funds ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC ↗
- Who funds ECOVIVA NFP ↗
- Who funds BakerRipley ↗
- Who funds PUEBLO A PUEBLO ↗
- Who funds COMMON GROUND COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE TANDANA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Montrose Center ↗
- Who funds SKYTRUTH ↗
- Who funds MAIA ↗
- Who funds SQUAREONE VILLAGES ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHAWK ↗
- Who funds THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S EQUITY COALITION ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE ↗
- Who funds WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP ↗
- Who funds THE SENTENCING PROJECT ↗
- Who funds WOMENS GLOBAL EDUCATION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds TREES WATER AND PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds Global Green USA ↗
- Who funds WHOLESOME WAVE INC ↗
- Who funds TRACE MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds DIYALO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Everybody Solar ↗
- Who funds MK LEVEL PLAYING FIELD INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds GlobeMed NFP ↗
- Who funds INKULULEKO INC ↗
- Who funds APOPO US INC ↗
- Who funds WATER FOR PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds POINT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds National Center for Science Education ↗
- Who funds KIVA MICROFUNDS ↗
- Who funds My Sisters House ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Globalgiving Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · Pledgeling Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Seattle Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Chicago Community Trust · Shell USA Company Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Go Humanity Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Squareone Villages — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Go Humanity Inc?
Find your warmest path to Go Humanity Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.