Skip to content
Global Trimension Impact Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Global Trimension Impact Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$88kHuman Services$15kEducation$12kFood & Nutrition$1kHealth$707Civil Rights$300Community Improvement$150Other$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,200
Median grant
2
States reached
$86k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,600
Echo Church$2,000
Institute for Principle Studies$1,600
Roots and Branch International Mini$1,200
CityTeam$1,200
Christ Holy Convenant Church$200
Individual grant recipient$200
Citizens for Better Community$150
RealOptions Obria Medical Clinics$107
Ark Baptist Church$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Life Purpose Power Teams: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$103k · 10 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +7% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
12

Total granted

$103k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
0%

Still filing today

40%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $550 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AB
    ARK BAPTIST CHURCH
    7× · 2017–2025 · $50k
  • IF
    Institute for Principle Studies
    7× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue -31%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k

Funded once

  • LP
    Life Purpose Power Teams
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue -21%
  • A
    ACTS
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • RO
    RIVER OF LIFE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kingdom of God Ministry

We are a Christian organization. The mission of this ministry is to preach the Gospel to all nations through the guidance of the Holy Spirit, declare God's glory among the nations and His marvelous deeds.

—
2
Gospel Operation International for Chinese Christians

Our mission is to accomplish the Great Commission through the use of resources of Chinese churches worldwide in mission education, recruitment, training, missionary sending, and all other effective means in collaboration with the Global…

Religion
3
Chinese Christian Life Fellowship Inc

To edify and make disciples of mainland china and overseas chinese christians to become devoted to only one great person: jesus christ the lord and savior and be motivated by only one greater purpose: building up his church for his glory

Religion
4
China Evangelical Seminary North America

The seminary offers theological study programs leading to diploma of christian studies, master of christian studies and master of divinity. it also offers as a continuing education for laymen or ministers in christian theology.

Religion
5
Sagos Institute of Preaching and Bible Exposition

The mission of our school can be divided into 4 areas:1.To cultivate students exegesis & preaching of the Scriptures rightly based on truth found in Bible. 2.To edify Bible study talents to teach Bible and lead Bible study as the focus of…

Education
6
Gospel Operation International (Usa)

To establish and support evangelical missions to China, with its related cultural, social, and educational activities.

Religion
7
China Outreach Ministriesinc

The purpose of the organization is to spread the gospel of jesus christ to the chinese people.

—
8
Institute of Chinese Studies

ChinsSource is a trusted partner and platform for educating the global church on critical issues facing the church and ministries in China and for connecting Christians inside and outside China to advance the kingdom of God globally

International
9
Chinese Worldwide Gospel Mission

To spread gospel and provide Christianity training to the people in China through volunteer pastors and church elders from the United States.

Religion
10
Harvest University

Harvest university is committed to cultivating future ministers who will take the gospel to the ends of the earth. we offer online classes to train missionaries, pastors, and others who want to make an impact for christ through other…

Religion
11
China Partner

Help churches in china fulfill the great commission through training emerging christian leaders. train leaders in evangelism, evangelistic preaching, pastoral care and leadership through seminaries and bible school in china. distribute…

—
12
Ambassadors for Christ International - Usa Inc

Ambassadors for Christ International - USA is a fellowship of gospel preachers and teachers whose mission is to preach Christ, edify the Church, and to glorify God and serve as a catalyst for revival, evangelism, and training of Christians…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Media Evangelism Association Usa; the most unlike its peers is Institute for Principle Studies. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
5/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARK BAPTIST CHURCH: $50,400 · OtherARK BAPTIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $10,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $7,300 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYECHO CHURCH: $3,800 · OtherGRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $2,700 · Other+8 more: $4,050 · OtherCITYTEAM MINISTRIES: $9,700 · ReligionCITYTEAM MINISTR…STREAM OF PRAISE MUSIC MINISTRIES: $6,000 · ReligionSTREAM OF PRAISE…+3 more: $1,260 · Religion+3 moreInstitute for Principle Studies: $10,880 · EducationInstitute f…LEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationLEHIGH UNIV…+1 more: $400 · EducationLife Purpose Power Teams: $7,778 · Human ServicesRIVER OF LIFE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Arts & CultureOPERATION DAWN: $400 · HealthREALOPTIONS: $307 · Health
Other$78,450Religion$16,960Education$12,280Human Services$7,778Arts & Culture$1,000Health$707

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInstitute for Principle Studies: $10,880 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetCITYTEAM MINISTRIES: $9,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLife Purpose Power Teams: $7,778 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetSTREAM OF PRAISE MUSIC MINISTRIES: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRIVER OF LIFE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEDIA EVANGELISM ASSOCIATION USA: $560 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHOWERS OF BLESSING EVANGELISTIC MINISTRY USA: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION DAWN: $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICA CHINESE EVANGELICAL SEMINARY: $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREALOPTIONS: $307 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA Kernel of Wheat Christian Ministries: $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nehemiah Internationa…Shp Christian Foundat…The Blackbaud Giving …Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Natl Christian Charit…Paypal Charitable Giv…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Nehemiah International Service Incorporation NisCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nehemiah International Service Incorporation Nis · Shp Christian Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Global Trimension Impact Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Global Trimension Impact Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Global Trimension Impact Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Global Trimension Impact Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Global Trimension Impact’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home