· Public charity
Nehemiah International Service Incorporation Nis
Mobilize Overseas Christians, Nurture believers toward spiritual maturity and help build healthy materials and interpersonal relationships.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 21 grants below total $370,950 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $432,450 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $61,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $266k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MYANMAR OVERSEAS MOCPI | $75,050 |
| NORTH AMERICA BIBLE INSTITUTE | $48,300 |
| MINORITIES FOR CHRIST INTERN | $30,000 |
| AMBASSADORS FOR CHRIST INC | $20,000 |
| SOWERS INTERNATIONAL | $20,000 |
| SHOWERS OF BLESSING EVANGELIS | $15,000 |
| CHINESE THEOLOGICAL RESOURACE | $15,000 |
| CHINESE CHRISTIAN MISSION | $15,000 |
| INTERVARSITY CHRISTIAN FELLOW | $15,000 |
| EUROPE CAMPUS MINISTRY | $12,000 |
| OPERATION DAWN | $12,000 |
| CHINESE EN FU ORGANIZATION | $12,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,000 |
| HEART OF HOPE ASIAN AMERICAN | $10,000 |
| AMERICA CHINESE EVANGELICAL S | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 29% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 6% of Nehemiah International Service Incorporation Nis’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 70% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 66% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
27 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MOMYANMAR OVERSEAS CHRISTIAN PREACHER TRAINING INC8× · 2018–2025 · $386k · revenue +13% · 28% of their budget
- NANORTH AMERICA BIBLE INSTITUTE7× · 2019–2025 · $371k · revenue +626% · 57% of their budget
- MFMINORITIES FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONAL6× · 2018–2025 · $87k · revenue +89%
Funded once
- CPCROSSROADS PUBLICATIONSgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $16k · revenue +210%
- THTHE HOME OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CUPERTINOone grant, 2018 · $16k
- CECHINA EVANGELISTIC MISSION INCone grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Help churches in china fulfill the great commission through training emerging christian leaders. train leaders in evangelism, evangelistic preaching, pastoral care and leadership through seminaries and bible school in china. distribute…
Religious
To spread and promote gospel and Christian faith to China
Christian Ministry Activities
China Christian Evangelic mission development
Spread the Christianity
Proclaim and share the Gospel of Christ in unique ways throughout Asia to reach Christians and non-Christians.
Training pastors in third world countries
Spreading the gospel to chinese people around the world. preaching the gospel to the chinese people; sending mission workers into various countries; helping churches in the u.s. and abroad with a vision for world evangelism.
SWM Mission is an abbreviation for Silk Wave Mission, and is an organization that serves as a united prayer movement, church planting movement, and missionary church movement for spiritual recovery and revival in Turkey and the Islamic…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ambassadors for Christ Inc and the most unlike its peers is North America Bible Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MYANMAR OVERSEAS CHRISTIAN PREACHER TRAINING INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH AMERICA BIBLE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CHINESE CHRISTIAN MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds MINORITIES FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds AMBASSADORS FOR CHRIST INC ↗
- Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
- Who funds EUROPE CAMPUS MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds THE MEDIA EVANGELISM ASSOCIATION USA ↗
- Who funds AMERICA CHINESE EVANGELICAL SEMINARY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC ↗
- Who funds U Channel Foundation ↗
- Who funds SHOWERS OF BLESSING EVANGELISTIC MINISTRY USA ↗
- Who funds OPERATION DAWN ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN SONG-ZHU CARING MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds PROPAGATE MEDIA INCORPORATON ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS PUBLICATIONS ↗
- Who funds CHINA EVANGELISTIC MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds Logos Evangelical Seminary ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds OVERSEAS CAMPUS MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds LUKE CHRISTIAN MEDICAL MISSION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Reverend Geng Ming Shih Foundation Inc · Westgate Foundation · Dandelion Seed Foundation · Joshua Mission · Pysf Family Foundation · Freshwind Foundation · Global Trimension Impact Foundation · Shp Christian Foundation · The Hsieh Christian Foundation · Adonai Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Nehemiah International Service Incorporation Nis funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Nehemiah International Service Incorporation Nis?
Find your warmest path to Nehemiah International Service Incorporation Nis through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.