Skip to content
Global Support and Development at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Global Support and Development

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
52
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$426k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$2.8MInternational$2.3MCommunity Improvement$270kPhilanthropy$207kFood & Nutrition$129kHuman Services$123kHealth$86kHousing & Shelter$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k29 grants · $124k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $356k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $914k
  • $250k+2 grants · $821k
$8,256
Median grant
4
States reached
$79M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HONDURAS SECRETARY OF STATE IN THE OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT AND NATIONAL C$425,734
CARIBBEAN DISASTER EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY$395,470
PANAMA SISTEMA NACIONAL DE PROTECCION CIVIL$173,050
DIRECTION GENERALE DE LA PROTECTION CIVILE D'HAITI$162,503
SAINT LUCIA NATIONAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION$140,990
PACIFIC ISLANDS ASSOCIATION OF NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS$110,000
PACIFIC ISLANDS ASSOCIATION OF NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS$101,200
HONDURAS SECRETARY OF STATE IN THE OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT AND NATIONAL C$100,013
CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE FONTAINE FOUNDATION INC$64,500
CARIBBEAN DISASTER EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY$62,238
TOBAGO EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY$47,796
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION$47,650
HONDURAS SECRETARY OF STATE IN THE OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT AND NATIONAL C$41,450
SAINT LUCIA FIRE SERVICE$34,210
INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF VOLUNTARY AGENCIES$28,578
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 25% of grant dollars ($1.5M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 75% that went abroad ($4.6M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $229k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ECONOMIC STIMULUS PROJECTS FOR WORK AND ACTION: $220k → 8%WASHINGTON SEARCH AND RESCUE VOLUNTARY ADVISORY COUNCIL: $2k → 9%THE RELATIVES INC: $2k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF CHARLOTTE: $3k → 10%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
WI
MA
OR
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
UT
VA
NC
DC
LA
GA
FL

Beyond the US: 75% of all-years giving ($4.6M)

22 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Australia$1.4M · 6 grants
Barbados$697k · 9 grants
Honduras$598k · 6 grants
United Kingdom$580k · 5 grants
Fiji$228k · 5 grants
St Lucia$213k · 7 grants
Haiti$199k · 3 grants
Panama$181k · 2 grants
Mauritius$90k · 2 grants
OC$90k · 4 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 9 repeat orgs$3.6M to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
39

Total granted

$2.5M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+9%

Still filing today

22%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterHealthAnimalsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RG
    RESPOND GLOBAL PTY LTD
    2× · 2022–2023 · $1.4M
  • CD
    CARIBBEAN DISASTER EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
    3× · 2021–2024 · $697k
  • SL
    SAINT LUCIA NATIONAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $178k

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ACTIVE LEARNING NETWORK FOR ACCOUNTABILITY AND PERFORMANCE
    one grant, 2023 · $500k
  • ES
    Economic Stimulus Projects for Works and Action Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $220k · revenue -96%
  • TD
    THE DALTON FAMILY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $207k · revenue +86%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Strategic Global Response

Strategic Global Response effectively and efficiently delivers life-saving care to people affected by humanitarian crises, in the most challenging situations on earth

Human Services
2
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
3
International Federation of Red Cross Red Crescent Soc At the Un Inc
—
4
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
5
International Rescue Committee Inc

The International Rescue Committee responds to the world's worst humanitarian crises and helps people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive, recover, and gain control of their future.

International
6
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
7
Rescue 82 Inc

Humanitarian aid

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Nyc Medics

The organization was formed for the charitable purpose of alleviating suffering caused by natural disasters and other humanitarian crises in foreign countries.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
MedGlobal Inc

MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…

Health
10
Comprehensive Disaster Relief

To permanently improve the health status of communities around the world by providing sustainable and affordable quality healthcare and disaster relief services and social welfare projects

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Emergency Management Group - Washington
Public Safety & Disaster
12
Emergency Medical Services at the University of Washington
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope for Haiti Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Dalton Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/30
Grantees still filing
15/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RESPOND GLOBAL PTY LTD: $1,405,740 · OtherRESPOND GLOBAL PTY LTDCARIBBEAN DISASTER EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY: $696,536 · OtherCARIBBEAN DISASTER EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCYHONDURAS SECRETARY OF STATE IN THE OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT AND NATIONAL C: $597,977 · OtherHONDURAS SECRETARY OF STATE IN THE OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT AND NATIONAL CTHE ACTIVE LEARNING NETWORK FOR ACCOUNTABILITY AND PERFORMANCE: $500,000 · OtherTHE ACTIVE LEARNING NETWORK FOR ACCOUNTABILITY AND PERFORMANCEPACIFIC ISLANDS ASSOCIATION OF NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS: $227,101 · OtherDIRECTION GENERALE DE LA PROTECTION CIVILE D'HAITI: $191,018 · OtherPANAMA SISTEMA NACIONAL DE PROTECCION CIVIL: $181,306 · OtherSAINT LUCIA NATIONAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION: $178,177 · Other+43 more: $867,349 · Other+43 moreWorld Hope International Inc: $200,000 · InternationalEMPACT NORTHWEST: $57,100 · InternationalGLOBAL EMERGENCY RELIEF RECOVERY AND RECONSTRUCTION: $50,000 · InternationalHOPE FOR HAITI INC: $45,608 · InternationalYACHTAID GLOBAL: $39,430 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $21,839 · International+1 more: $6,000 · InternationalEconomic Stimulus Projects for Works and Action Inc: $220,000 · Human ServicesOperation Warm Inc: $23,051 · Human Services+4 more: $8,659 · Human ServicesTHE DALTON FAMILY FOUNDATION: $207,000 · PhilanthropyEDESIA INC: $126,275 · Food & NutritionCLARK COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE SEARCH AND RESCUE: $112,135 · Public Safety & DisasterVashonBePrepared: $8,021 · Public Safety & DisasterBOULDER CREEK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $4,335 · Public Safety & Disaster+2 more: $1,142 · Public Safety & DisasterCentre Hospitalier de Fontaine Foundation: $64,500 · HealthGLOBAL SURGICAL AND MEDICAL SUPPORT GROUP: $15,000 · Health+1 more: $540 · Health
Other$4,845,204International$419,977Human Services$251,710Philanthropy$207,000Food & Nutrition$126,275Public Safety & Disaster$125,633Health$80,040

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE DALTON FAMILY FOUNDATION: $207,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetWorld Hope International Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEDESIA INC: $126,275 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCentre Hospitalier de Fontaine Foundation: $64,500 over 1y, 40% of budgetEMPACT NORTHWEST: $57,100 over 1y, 23% of budgetTHE WORLD ASSOCIATION FOR EMERGENCY & DISASTER MEDICINE INC: $51,220 over 1y, 25% of budgetGLOBAL EMERGENCY RELIEF RECOVERY AND RECONSTRUCTION: $50,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetHOPE FOR HAITI INC: $45,608 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYACHTAID GLOBAL: $39,430 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetOperation Warm Inc: $23,051 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIFEMOVES: $21,992 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $21,839 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE HOPE ASSOCIATION: $17,721 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNORTHEAST LOUISIANA VETERANS ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 1y, 54% of budgetGLOBAL SURGICAL AND MEDICAL SUPPORT GROUP: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetVashonBePrepared: $8,021 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE IMAGINE MINISTRY INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBOULDER CREEK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $4,335 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCatholic Charities Diocese of Charlotte: $3,280 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RELATIVES INC: $1,570 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc: $1,320 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER SPRINGFIELD VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOSPITALITY HOUSE OF CHARLOTTE: $540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFENCES FOR FIDO: $436 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOL RELIEF: $142 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Economic Stimulus Projects for Works and Action Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE DALTON FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds World Hope International Inc ↗
  • Who funds EDESIA INC ↗
  • Who funds CLARK COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE SEARCH AND RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Centre Hospitalier de Fontaine Foundation ↗
  • Who funds EMPACT NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds THE WORLD ASSOCIATION FOR EMERGENCY & DISASTER MEDICINE INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL EMERGENCY RELIEF RECOVERY AND RECONSTRUCTION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FOR HAITI INC ↗
  • Who funds YACHTAID GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds IDEA RELIEF FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Operation Warm Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIFEMOVES ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE HOPE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST LOUISIANA VETERANS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL SURGICAL AND MEDICAL SUPPORT GROUP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Leon Levine Found…Foundation for the Ca…Duke Energy FoundationMorgan Stanley Global…Enterprise Holdings F…American Endowment Fo…Paypal Charitable Giv…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…Network for Good
The Leon Levine FoundationNC13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Leon Levine Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Global Support and Development funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Global Support and Development. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Hope for Haiti Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Global Support and Development?

Find your warmest path to Global Support and Development through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Global Support and Development’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home