· Private foundation
Glenn and Janice McCoy Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $225k
- $50k–250k15 grants · $1.2M
- $250k+1 grant · $285k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CITY OF CHILDREN | $285,000 |
| STATE COLLEGE CHURCH OF CHRIST | $176,000 |
| BAXTER FOUNDATION INC | $150,000 |
| BAJA MISSIONS | $150,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION | $125,000 |
| THE CONVERSATION GROUP | $75,000 |
| JOVENES EN CAMINO | $75,000 |
| HARDING UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| A CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| VOH GHANA | $50,000 |
| MISSIONS RESOURCE NETWORK | $50,000 |
| MARK AND JACOB ISKANDER FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| RECOVERY ROAD INC | $50,000 |
| HOPE NETWORK MINISTRIES | $50,000 |
| PATHWAY PROJECT | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $240k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
31 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $980k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WVWORLD VIDEO BIBLE SCHOOL6× · 2018–2023 · $206k · revenue +58%
- FHFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $160k · revenue +32%
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC8× · 2017–2024 · $121k · revenue +98%
Funded once
- SCSTATE COLLEGE CHURCH OF CHRISTone grant, 2019 · $166k
- COCHURCH OF CHRISTone grant, 2017 · $141k
- LSLEAGUE STREET CHURCH OF CHRISTone grant, 2022 · $55k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.
Organization operates a children's home in Honduras that provides food, clothing, shelter, medical care and education to abused and abandonded children in need.
To develope a ministry using the earthly work of Jesus Christ as a model and thereby seek the physical, mental, emotional and spiritual well-being of individuals in communities, esecially in developing countries by providing humanitarian…
To be an organization where people are excited to assist in the love and care of the orphan and those in foster care, as well as providing temporary housing and training for those in the worldwide missionary field.
Childrens Home and Ministry in India
Mobilize loving and qualified Pastors, Caregivers, Educators, Administrative Personnel, and Volunteers to establish Children's Homes, Schools, and Medical Clinics in Liberia. Facilities and programming are designed to care for orphaned…
His house children's home is a faith-based organization that restores the lives of children and families.
We are compelled by god's word to provide security, education and the hope of jesus to children in south africa so they can thrive personally and impact their future families, communities and the kingdom of god.
Provide food, shelter, and medical assistance for children around the world.
Living hope international (lhi) is a faith-based organization with a three-fold mission. our goals are to: provide for underprivileged children and families by establishing orphanages, schools, and outreach programs throughout the world.…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The James Storehouse Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Dry Bones Denver. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CITY OF CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Harding University Inc ↗
- Who funds WORLD VIDEO BIBLE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BAXTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds THE JAMES STOREHOUSE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds JUVENTUD EN CAMINO ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE CONVERSATION GROUP ↗
- Who funds BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
- Who funds HOPE NETWORK MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Tanda Lodge Inc ↗
- Who funds MISSIONS RESOURCE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds VOH - GHANA ↗
- Who funds Mark and Jacob Iskander Foundation ↗
- Who funds A CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Recovery Road Inc ↗
- Who funds HEALTH TALENTS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds GRACE INTERNATIONAL WORLD OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds Orange County Rescue Mission Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Glenn and Janice McCoy Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Glenn and Janice McCoy Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Glenn and Janice McCoy Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.