Skip to content

· Private foundation

Glen and Vicki Hess Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$77kHealth$3kFood & Nutrition$2kHuman Services$1kArts & Culture$1kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$101k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHICAGO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY BROOKFIELD ZOO$5,000
RED RIVER OES RESCUE$1,000
BLUE MAN DOG$1,000
IMMUNE DEFICIENCY FOUNDATION$1,000
ST CLETUS FOOD PANTRY$1,000
CAPE MAY COUNTY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
HINSDALE HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
GREENE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,000
PASADENA PLAYHOUSE$1,000
NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGBORS$1,000
A MEANINGFUL PURPOSE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES: $250 → 14%HELPING HAND CENTER: $1k → 14%PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY TREASURE CHEST FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%THE PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY TREASURE CHEST FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$75k · 4 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$75k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+81%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesSocial ScienceHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Chicago Zoological Society
    8× · 2017–2025 · $70k · revenue +43%
  • CF
    CATNAP FROM THE HEART
    4× · 2019–2023 · $2k · revenue +182%
  • HH
    HINSDALE HUMANE SOCIETY
    2× · 2020–2025 · $2k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • HH
    HELPING HAND CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +81%
  • LC
    LUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $250 · revenue +23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society of Harlingen

The humane society takes in approximately 6000 dogs and cats each year. they accept animals picked up by local animal control and any animals brought in by individuals. the primary goal of the humane society is to end animal suffering.…

Animals
2
Plainfield Area Humane Society

To find a safe, loving and appropriate home for every homeless pet, including those with special needs or challenges. PAHS strives to treat, heal, and provide optimal well-being for the animals in their care.

Animals
3
Helping Hounds Dog Rescue Inc

Helping hounds dog rescue provides a compassionate approach to dog rescue by matching homeless dogs from overcrowded shelter systems with loving homes.

Animals
4
Humane Society of Truckee-Tahoe

The Humane Society is dedicated to saving and improving the lives of pets through adoptions, community spay/neuter services and humane eduon programs.

Animals
5
Humane Society of Madison County

The mission of HSMC is to provide shelter, medical care, and comfort to stray and surrendered dogs and cats while working to secure their forever homes.

Animals
6
Chicago Canine Rescue Foundation

Chicago canine rescue foundation finds permanent homes for homeless dogs in our community with a specific emphasis on assisting the most vulnerable animals, who without our help, would have no other options. while in our care, they are…

Animals
7
Happy Paws Haven Co

Happy Paws Haven Co. is a foster based animal rescue agency that helps animals in need.

—
8
Adopt-a-Dog Inc

To save, socialize and secure loving homes for unwanted or abandoned dogs.

Animals
9
People for Pets

People for pets is a non-profit organization devoted to finding homes for abandoned pets as well as caring for lost pets. people for pets also promotes spaying and neutering.

Animals
10
Good Home Pet Adoptions Inc

Rescue and adoptions of cats and dogs. find home for companion animals

Animals
11
Pet Network Humane Society

Pet Network rescues adoptable animals from euthanasia, connects abandoned animals with loving families, instills respect for animals through humane education, and enhances lives through animal companionship.

Animals
12
Adopt-a-Pet Inc

Adopt-a-pets misson is to continue to find loving families for homeless dogs and cats as well as assist people in the community with their personal animals. the organization provides medical and emotional care to each animal that enters…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helping Hand Center; the most unlike its peers is A Meaningful Purpose Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Chicago Zoological Society: $70,000 · AnimalsChicago Zoological Society+5 more: $6,500 · Animals+5 moreRED RIVER OES RESCUE: $1,000 · OtherST CLETUS FOOD PANTRY: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherHELPING HAND CENTER: $1,000 · Human ServicesPediatric Oncology Treasure Chest: $1,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES FUND: $250 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS INC: $1,000 · Social ScienceGREENE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterIMMUNE DEFICIENCY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthTHE PASADENA PLAYHOUSE STATE THEATRE OF CALIFORNIA INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Animals$76,500Other$3,000Human Services$2,250Social Science$1,000Housing & Shelter$1,000Health$1,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChicago Zoological Society: $70,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCATNAP FROM THE HEART: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHINSDALE HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREENE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHELPING HAND CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCape May County Zoological Society Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBlue Man Dog: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPediatric Oncology Treasure Chest: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PASADENA PLAYHOUSE STATE THEATRE OF CALIFORNIA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES FUND: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY12.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Glen and Vicki Hess Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Glen and Vicki Hess Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Glen and Vicki Hess Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Glen and Vicki Hess Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Glen and Vicki Hess’ filings →

    More from the funding graph