· Private foundation
Geyer Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NWTC EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION | $4,500 |
| GIVING GREEN | $4,000 |
| FORT LEWIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF | $3,000 |
| WELL DONE FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| UNICEF USA | $2,500 |
| CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE | $1,500 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND | $1,500 |
| SPLASH | $1,500 |
| ADAMS STATE UNIVERSITY | $1,500 |
| NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL | $1,500 |
| WATER FOR PEOPLE | $1,500 |
| WATERORG | $1,500 |
| THE HIVE DGO | $1,500 |
| ACLU FOUNDATION OF OREGON | $1,300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
43 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NWNORTHEAST WISCONSIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC6× · 2020–2025 · $19k · revenue +69%
- WDWell Done Foundation Inc4× · 2022–2025 · $8k · revenue +136%
- TFTHE FORT LEWIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION4× · 2022–2025 · $8k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $4k
- FLFORT LEWIS COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIPone grant, 2022 · $1k
- GWGIVING WHAT WE CANone grant, 2023 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
Shape and drive bold policy solutions to achieve equitable carbon-neutral economies.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NORTHEAST WISCONSIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Well Done Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FORT LEWIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP ↗
- Who funds CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds WATERORG ↗
- Who funds WHITE BIRD CLINIC ↗
- Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds TICKET TO DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc ↗
- Who funds American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Oregon Inc ↗
- Who funds THE IDIOPATHIC PULMONARY FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds GREATER GREEN BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ACLU FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
- Who funds The Hive DGO ↗
- Who funds WATER FOR PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds BEJA SHRINERS ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · John and Engrid Meng Inc · Schneider National Foundation Inc · George Kress Foundation Inc · K C Stock Foundation Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Bernard E and Alyce G Dahlin Foundation Inc · Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc · Door County Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Geyer Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- White Bird Clinic — 29% of income from government
- Food for Lane County — 5% of income from government
- Oregon Public Broadcasting — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.