Skip to content

· Private foundation

George K Tallman Trust Xxxxx0004

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$122k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$367kEducation$144kHuman Services$111kPublic Benefit$110kHealth$61kYouth Development$60kInternational$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $100k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROCK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$45,000
JANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$25,000
BELOIT COLLEGE$15,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF JANESVILLE$15,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-WISCONSIN$8,277
MILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE$5,000
JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $63k → 10%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $8k → 10%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $5k → 10%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $5k → 10%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $5k → 10%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$834k · 9 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$834k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+12%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $91k · revenue +33%
  • HO
    HEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $46k · revenue +87%
  • JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $25k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • YO
    YMCA OF NORTHERN ROCK COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +49%
  • AH
    Agrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +12%
  • HE
    HAMILTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue -12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
2
Wisconsin Association of Agricultural Educators Inc

The corporation is organized exclusively for educational purposes, to improve and advance agricultural education efforts in the state of wisconsin at the secondary and post-secondary levels. programs and activities aim to provide…

—
3
Wisconsin Nurses Association Incorporated

The wisconsin nurses association advocates for policies that positively impact the nursing workforce. the association also supports workplace standards that promoted safe patient and nursing care.the association advocated for full practice…

—
4
Junior Achievement of Northern in Inc

The mission statement of jani is: to inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy.

International
5
Burnett Medical Center Inc

The mission of burnett medical center is to provide compassionate, comprehensive, community healthcare that exceeds our customer's expectations. our mission, as well as our vision and values, serves as a guideline for daily decision making…

Health
6
Coe College

Coe college is a private, four-year co-educational liberal arts college.

Education
7
Young Men's Christian Association of Jamestown New York

The mission of the Jamestown Area Family YMCA is "To put Christian principles into practice through programs that build strong kids, strong families, and strong communities by enriching the lives of all people in spirit, mind, and body."

Human Services
8
Janesville Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
9
Rainbow Childcare of Monroe Inc

Rainbow Childcare Inc. is a not for profit child care agency committed to providing quality, affordable, learning-oriented child care to the greater Green County community. We serve the children enrolled at Rainbow Childcare, Inc. and…

Human Services
10
Rock River Repertory Theatre

Inspire artists, audiences, and our greater southern wisconsin community to celabrate the art of theatre.

Arts & Culture
11
Wisconsin Broadcasters Association Inc

The purpose of the wisconsin broadcasters association shall be to foster and promote the development of the arts of aural and visual broadcasting in all its forms; to protect its members in every lawful and proper manner from injustices…

Community Improvement
12
Hastings College

Hastings college is a private, co-education, residential, liberal arts college founded in 1882.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthnet of Rock County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Janesville Community Day Care Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROCK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $198,671 · Arts & CultureROCK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INCJANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $168,539 · Arts & CultureJANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INCCITY OF JANESVILLE: $110,000 · OtherCITY OF JANESVILLEBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF JANESVILLE: $60,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF JAN…YMCA OF NORTHERN ROCK COUNTY INC: $20,000 · OtherYMCA OF NORTHERN ROCK COUN…MILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $15,000 · OtherMILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL C…+1 more: $3,600 · OtherBELOIT COLLEGE: $120,000 · EducationBELOIT COLLEGEJANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER INC: $91,000 · Human ServicesJANESVILLE …HEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INC: $45,500 · HealthAgrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc: $15,000 · HealthJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $25,403 · InternationalHAMILTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 · Philanthropy
Arts & Culture$367,210Other$208,600Education$120,000Human Services$91,000Health$60,500International$25,403Philanthropy$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROCK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $198,671 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetJANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $168,539 over 7y, 4.9% of budgetBELOIT COLLEGE: $120,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER INC: $91,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetHEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INC: $45,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $25,403 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetYMCA OF NORTHERN ROCK COUNTY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAgrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHAMILTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROCK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds JANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BELOIT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF NORTHERN ROCK COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Agrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HAMILTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI17.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Jpc Foundation · Janesville Foundation Inc · Claremont S Jackman Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Dorothy a Ashcraft Charitable Xxxxx7008 · Walter & Jessie Francisco Char Fnd Xxxxx8003 · Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George K Tallman Trust Xxxxx0004 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George K Tallman Trust Xxxxx0004. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on George K Tallman Trust Xxxxx0004’s filings →

    More from the funding graph