· Private foundation
George K Tallman Trust Xxxxx0004
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ROCK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $45,000 |
| JANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER | $25,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF JANESVILLE | $15,000 |
| BELOIT COLLEGE | $15,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-WISCONSIN | $8,277 |
| MILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE | $5,000 |
| JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,600 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JCJANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER INC6× · 2018–2025 · $91k · revenue +33%
- HOHEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INC4× · 2018–2021 · $46k · revenue +87%
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC4× · 2022–2025 · $25k · revenue +9%
Funded once
- YOYMCA OF NORTHERN ROCK COUNTY INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +49%
- AHAgrace HospiceCare Foundation Incone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +12%
- HEHAMILTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue -12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…
The corporation is organized exclusively for educational purposes, to improve and advance agricultural education efforts in the state of wisconsin at the secondary and post-secondary levels. programs and activities aim to provide…
The wisconsin nurses association advocates for policies that positively impact the nursing workforce. the association also supports workplace standards that promoted safe patient and nursing care.the association advocated for full practice…
The mission statement of jani is: to inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy.
The mission of burnett medical center is to provide compassionate, comprehensive, community healthcare that exceeds our customer's expectations. our mission, as well as our vision and values, serves as a guideline for daily decision making…
Coe college is a private, four-year co-educational liberal arts college.
The mission of the Jamestown Area Family YMCA is "To put Christian principles into practice through programs that build strong kids, strong families, and strong communities by enriching the lives of all people in spirit, mind, and body."
Rainbow Childcare Inc. is a not for profit child care agency committed to providing quality, affordable, learning-oriented child care to the greater Green County community. We serve the children enrolled at Rainbow Childcare, Inc. and…
Inspire artists, audiences, and our greater southern wisconsin community to celabrate the art of theatre.
The purpose of the wisconsin broadcasters association shall be to foster and promote the development of the arts of aural and visual broadcasting in all its forms; to protect its members in every lawful and proper manner from injustices…
Hastings college is a private, co-education, residential, liberal arts college founded in 1882.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthnet of Rock County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Janesville Community Day Care Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ROCK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds JANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BELOIT COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF NORTHERN ROCK COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Agrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds HAMILTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Jpc Foundation · Janesville Foundation Inc · Claremont S Jackman Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Dorothy a Ashcraft Charitable Xxxxx7008 · Walter & Jessie Francisco Char Fnd Xxxxx8003 · Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization George K Tallman Trust Xxxxx0004 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.