· Private foundation
Jpc Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k66 grants · $159k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $264k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| KANDU INDUSTRIES INC | $33,333 |
| EDGERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT | $25,000 |
| UNION GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT | $20,000 |
| BLACKHAWK VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC | $20,000 |
| CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ROCK COUNTY | $20,000 |
| FISCC INC (FRIENDS OF THE WOODMAN'S CENTER) | $16,700 |
| FORWARD FOUNDATION INC | $16,666 |
| STOUGHTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC | $15,000 |
| CRAFTSMAN WITH CHARACTER FOUNDATION INC | $15,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN PLATTEVILLE FOUNDATION INC | $12,000 |
| GOOD SAMARITAN INN | $10,000 |
| DECATUR PARKS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| ST JOHN VIANNEY CATHOLIC CHURCH | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
59 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $872k · revenue +29%
- MPMILWAUKEE PRESERVATION ALLIANCE4× · 2021–2024 · $200k · revenue +339% · 36% of their budget
- TUTHE UW-PLATTEVILLE FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC5× · 2021–2025 · $76k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- SPST PAUL'S CATHOLIC CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $20k
- SPST PAUL'S CATHOLIC CENTERone grant, 2021 · $20k
- LLLEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY-WISCONSIN CHAPTERone grant, 2021 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To partner with the public and private sectors to develop and hold real estate for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. the uwm real estate foundation, inc. holdings may include any properties that advance the mission of…
Reedsburg area medical center, always there, going beyond the expected to provide compassionate, quality, and efficient health care.
We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.
The uw-green bay foundation furthers the mission of uw-green bay, a public university, by developing and increasing opportunities for students primarily in the areas other than those in which the state of wisconsin ordinarily makes…
The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.
Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.
Our mission is to enrich the lives of older adults through gracious retirement living, spiritual growth, cultural and educational opportunities and health care services.
The purpose of the association shall be to restore and conserve wisconsin's waterfowl and wetland resources; to educate state waterfowlers during their progression from natural resource consumer to steward; and to promote governmental…
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
The mission of the center for healthcare careers of southeast wisconsin, inc. (chcsew) is to unite all appropriate stakeholders in a viable, flexible structure to locate, educate and support a workforce from service to professional levels…
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc and the most unlike its peers is Veterans of Foreign Wars United. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 147 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE PRESERVATION ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Forward Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BLACKHAWK TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE UW-PLATTEVILLE FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Agrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds KANDU INDUSTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF NORTHERN ROCK COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Stoughton Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds OAKWOOD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF ROCK COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds MERITER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF DANE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING ↗
- Who funds JANESVILLE YOUTH FOOTBALL INC ↗
- Who funds GOD IS FAITHFUL TEMPORARY SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds CRAFTSMAN WITH CHARACTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RHINELANDER HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CEDAR CREST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OPERATION FRESH START INC ↗
- Who funds GILDA'S CLUB MADISON WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds PATRONATO SAN XAVIER ↗
- Who funds AURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Hooper Corp Foundation · Madison Community Foundation · Janesville Foundation Inc · Seneca Foods Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Kennedy Family Foundation Inc · Claremont S Jackman Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jpc Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.