· Private foundation
Walter & Jessie Francisco Char Fnd Xxxxx8003
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK | $7,100 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $6,000 |
| JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER | $5,000 |
| BELOITT COLLEGE | $5,000 |
| JANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS | $5,000 |
| NATIONAL SOCIETY TO PREVENT BLINDNESS | $4,000 |
| MILTON AREA YOUTH CENTER | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JPJANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC7× · 2018–2025 · $42k · revenue +106%
- JCJANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER INC5× · 2019–2025 · $29k · revenue +35%
BELOIT COLLEGE5× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- BHBELOIT HISTORICAL SOCIETYone grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -29%
- HOHEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +65%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OFone grant, 2024 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide early childhood and jewish education to the community.
The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…
The wisconsin nurses association advocates for policies that positively impact the nursing workforce. the association also supports workplace standards that promoted safe patient and nursing care.the association advocated for full practice…
Mission: we partner with members and the communities we serve to maximize health and well-being. (continued on schedule o)
The mission of burnett medical center is to provide compassionate, comprehensive, community healthcare that exceeds our customer's expectations. our mission, as well as our vision and values, serves as a guideline for daily decision making…
The mission of the greater beloit economic development corporation ("corporation") is to foster investment and job growth in the economy thereby improving the quality of life, educational attainment, housing availability and prosperity for…
The wisconsin broadcasters association foundation contribution to broadcasting in wisconsin encompasses a strategic, long term vision for enhancing, promoting and supporting the broadcast industry by encouraging the preservation of…
The johnson county ymca is a charitable, community service organization that includes men, women, and children of all ages, abilities, incomes, races, and religions. we are dedicated to building strong kids, strong families, and strong…
Junior achievement's mission is to inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy. junior achievement teaches students in grades k-12 how to manage money, how to prepare for a career or college, and how to run a business.…
We put christian principles into practice through programs that build a healthy spirit, mind and body for all. at the ymca, strengthening community is our cause. every day, we work sideby-side with our neighbors to make sure that everyone,…
The mission of wausau child care inc. is to strengthen child development, families and the community by providing access to safe, high quality early learning for children.
The organization is a cooperative, nonprofit corporation, incorporated under wisconsin state law to encourage thrift among its members, create a source of credit at a fair and reasonable cost, and provide an opportunity for its members to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Greater Beloit Inc and the most unlike its peers is Janesville Community Day Care Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MILTON AREA YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Prevent Blindness Wisconsin ↗
- Who funds JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BELOIT COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF NORTHERN ROCK COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI ↗
- Who funds BELOIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER BELOIT INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Allen Foundation Trust · Baird Foundation Inc · Dorothy a Ashcraft Charitable Xxxxx7008 · George K Tallman Trust Xxxxx0004 · Claremont S Jackman Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Walter & Jessie Francisco Char Fnd Xxxxx8003 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.