· Private foundation
Claremont S Jackman Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 61% of CLAREMONT S JACKMAN FOUNDATION XXX-XX-XXXX’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k45 grants · $114k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YMCA of Northern Rock County | $10,000 |
| Wisconsin Masonic Foundation | $6,174 |
| Boys & Girls Club of Janesville | $5,000 |
| HEALTH NET OF ROCK COUNTY INC | $5,000 |
| MADISON 32 MASONIC LEARNING CENTER | $5,000 |
| GLACIER S EDGE COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF | $5,000 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF WISCONSIN | $5,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY OF ROCK COUNTY | $4,500 |
| SALVATION ARMY OF DANE COUNTY | $4,500 |
| CEDAR CREST | $3,500 |
| JANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER | $3,000 |
| START FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| RETIRED SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROGRAM OF | $3,000 |
| Agrace Hospice Inc | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against -39% for the ones you funded once.
55 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF JANESVILLE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $44k · revenue +576%
- HOHEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INC8× · 2017–2025 · $39k · revenue +136%
- CCCEDAR CREST INC9× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +61%
Funded once
- SASalvation Armyone grant, 2017 · $7k
- HNHEALTH NET OF JANESVILLEone grant, 2022 · $6k
- BSBoy Souts of America 620 Glaciersone grant, 2017 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Village on the square, inc. sponsored by the masonic fraternity, takes pride in meeting the social, physical, and spiritual needs of older adults through high quality independent housing and services, including housekeeping, dining,…
Promote economic development in jefferson wi for its members
Inspire artists, audiences, and our greater southern wisconsin community to celabrate the art of theatre.
To foster the vitality of rural wisconsin, primarily through the promotion of education, improvement of health care services, cultural experiences, and support of the rural economic base.
Masonic center for health and rehab, inc., sponsored by the masonic fraternity, meets the social, physical, and spiritual needs of older adults by providing high quality housing and services in a skilled nursing facility.
To empower and support wpra members by fostering professional growth, advocating for the parks and recreation profession, and enhancing the quality of life for communities across wisconsin through education, networking, and leadership…
Provide and furnish aid and relief to the distressed and hardship cases of aged members of society and to administer to the needs of the aged.
The woman's club of wisconsin cultivates educational, cultural, philanthropic, and social exchange to inspire engagement in the community.
Provide affordable housing, support, and community to veterans throughout their lifespan.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wisconsin Masonic Home Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Norwegian Culture Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WISCONSIN MASONIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF JANESVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CEDAR CREST INC ↗
- Who funds JANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ROTARY BOTANICAL GARDENS INC ↗
- Who funds ROCK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF NORTHERN ROCK COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds APTIV FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN MASONIC HOME INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ARBORETUM ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN BADGER CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds HEDBERG PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOLKLORE VILLAGE FARM INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF NORWEGIAN CULTURE INC ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds GLACIER'S EDGE COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds THE GATHERING PLACE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc · Janesville Foundation Inc · Jpc Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · United Way Blackhawk Region Inc · Seneca Foods Foundation · Dorothy a Ashcraft Charitable Xxxxx7008 · George K Tallman Trust Xxxxx0004 · Mercy Health System Corporation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Claremont S Jackman Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.