· Private foundation
Genworth Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
Read this first · the figures below need context
92% of Genworth Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Blackbaud Giving Fund, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 13 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k18 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
- $250k+1 grant · $2.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The Blackbaud Giving Fund | $2,538,222 |
| UNC Chapel Hill Gift Clearing - IMRII | $150,000 |
| Project Homes | $20,000 |
| Mexico Grant Fundacion Hogares | $15,000 |
| THE GOLDMAN SACHS CHARITABLE | $10,000 |
| RISE AGAINST HUNGER INC | $6,100 |
| PROMUSICA CHAMBER ORCHESTRA | $2,500 |
| THE COLUMBUS ACADEMY | $2,500 |
| EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| PROMUSICA CHAMBER ORCHESTRA | $2,500 |
| Mexico special giving Todo Cambiara Albergues AC | $2,350 |
| MISSOURI STATE UNIV FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| TATA Mem Cent FCRA | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,250 |
| PRAIRIE PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC | $1,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
33 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $202k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NLNASHOBA LEARNING GROUP INC3× · 2019–2021 · $30k · revenue +60%
- ARAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK2× · 2020–2022 · $21k · revenue +1%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +74%
Funded once
- FMFEED MORE INCone grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue +8%
- 3C360 COMMUNITY CAPITALone grant, 2022 · $50k
- BIBENEVITY INCone grant, 2019 · $38k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Assurant Cares Employee Support Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND ↗
- Who funds FEED MORE INC ↗
- Who funds 360 COMMUNITY CAPITAL ↗
- Who funds NASHOBA LEARNING GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK ↗
- Who funds RICHMOND PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ELDERHOMES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR CAREGIVING ↗
- Who funds RISE AGAINST HUNGER INC ↗
- Who funds THE COLUMBUS ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds PRO MUSICA CHAMBER ORCHESTRA OF COLUMBUS INC ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds THE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOBE SOUND CHILD CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA HOUSING COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds MOFFETT FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST BERNARD'S SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds TRINITY EPISCOPAL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds The Conference Board Inc ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA CO INC ↗
- Who funds Portland Museum of Art ↗
- Who funds WOMENS CENTER OF WAKE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: McKesson Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Wells Fargo Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Carmax Foundation · Ibm International Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Genworth Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- St Vincent De Paul of Baltimore Inc — 40% of income from government
- Nashoba Learning Group Inc — 14% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Mote Marine Laboratory Inc — 4% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Martin County — 2% of income from government
- All Faiths Food Bank Inc — 1% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Genworth Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Genworth Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.