Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

General Service Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
58
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$310k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Civil Rights$9.9MPhilanthropy$9.0MCommunity Improvement$1.7MPublic Benefit$1.5MEmployment$1.4MArts & Culture$1.2MEnvironment$800kHuman Services$639kOther$0
02FY2024 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $71k
  • $50k–250k45 grants · $4.4M
  • $250k+1 grant · $310k
$70,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$65M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GROUNDSWELL FUND$310,000
NEIGHBORHOOD FUNDERS GROUP$210,000
ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS$200,000
NEW VENTURE FUND$200,000
ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS$200,000
NATIONAL DOMESTIC WORKERS ALLIANCE$180,000
BOREALIS PHILANTHROPY$160,000
PEOPLE'S ACTION INSTITUTE$150,000
KAIROS FELLOWSHIP$140,000
WOMENS MARCH NETWORK$125,000
SPARK REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE$125,000
SOLIDAIRE NETWORK$125,000
BOLD FUTURE NEW MEXICO$125,000
UNITED WE DREAM NETWORK$120,000
SOLIDAIRE NETWORK$110,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $804k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%UNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $100k → 7%United for a New Economy: $65k → 10%TTAWAXT BIRTH JUSTICE CENTER: $20k → 17%SOUTHERN BIRTH JUSTICE NETWORK: $40k → 15%United for a New Economy: $85k → 7%BOLD FUTURES NEW MEXICO: $125k → 14%United for a New Economy: $75k → 7%United for a New Economy: $40k → 7%INSTITUTO LAB: $100k → 11%Colorado People's Alliance: $75k → 12%COLORADO PEOPLES ALLIANCE: $44k → 12%Colorado People's Alliance: $35k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
RI
CA
CO
MD
AZ
NM
TN
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$18M · 79 repeat orgs$3.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

79 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2024, 42 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

79
49

Total granted

$18M
$2.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+11%

Still filing today

84%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementHealthArts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GF
    Groundswell Fund
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +5%
  • NEO Philanthropy Inc
    5× · 2019–2023 · $749k · revenue +58%
  • National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $745k · revenue +290%

Funded once

  • BT
    BEND THE ARC
    one grant, 2022 · $160k
  • AC
    Action Center on Race & the Economy Institutegraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $155k · revenue +30%
  • BF
    BOLD FUTURES NM
    one grant, 2022 · $125k · revenue -23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
3
The Alliance for Collective Action

The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…

Environment
4
New Roots Institute

New Roots Institute is a nonprofit empowering the next generation with knowledge and training to end factory farming.

Food & Nutrition
5
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
6
Equal Justice Society

The Equal Justice Society (EJS) is transforming the nations consciousness on racethrough law, social science, and the arts. EJS works to dismantle structural andinstitutional racism to advance robust equal protection under the Fourteenth…

Civil Rights
7
South Asian Americans Leading Together

South Asian Americans Leading Together is a national movement strategy and advocacy organization committed to racial justice through structural change.

8
Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…

Crime & Legal
9
Bold Impact

Bold Impact is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting a democracy where all communities get to thrive.

Arts & Culture
10
Right to Democracy Project

Advance democracy, equity, and self-determination in U.S. territories through participatory advocacy, narrative and cultural change, and ecosystem building.

Civil Rights
11
Wepower

We activate community power to redesign social systems to be just and equitable for all through (1) developing and supporting leaders and organizations and (2) leading campaigns, coalitions, and innovative initiatives.

Community Improvement
12
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy and the most unlike its peers is Instituto Lab. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyWomen & Girls Leadership De…Lgbtq+ Community SupportEnvironmental Conservation …Youth Development ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Immigrant Worker SupportSenior Support ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Dance Arts OrganizationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyDomestic Violence ServicesCommunity Arts CentersPregnancy Support ServicesJewish Community Organizati…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%14%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%40%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%2%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%13%5–10yr19%28%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%1%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%1/110
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,455

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

109 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 109 of the 147 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
108/109
Grantees still filing
60/109
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $2,105,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY …Groundswell Fund — $1,060,000 · PhilanthropyGroundswell FundAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc — $840,000 · PhilanthropyAmalgamated Charitable Fo…TIDES FOUNDATION — $805,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATIONSolidaire Network Inc — $660,000 · PhilanthropySolidaire Network IncTHE CENTER FOR CULTURAL POWER — $211,000 · Philanthropy+9 more — $459,500 · Philanthropy+9 moreNeighborhood Funders Group — $735,000 · OtherNeighborhood Funders GroupNATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT — $350,000 · OtherWomens March Network — $335,000 · OtherNEO Philanthropy Inc — $748,500 · OtherNEO Philanthropy IncForward Together — $482,500 · OtherUNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY — $365,000 · Other+69 more — $6,607,015 · Other+69 moreNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc — $745,000 · Civil RightsNational Domesti…BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC — $328,000 · Civil RightsBVM CAPACITY BUI…UNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC — $290,000 · Civil RightsUNITED WE DREAM …SOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC — $275,000 · Civil RightsSOUTHERNERS ON N…SPARK REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE NOW — $270,000 · Civil RightsSPARK REPRODUCTI…MS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC — $240,000 · Civil RightsMS FOUNDATION FO…COLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION — $230,000 · Civil RightsCOLORADO IMMIGRA…JOLT INITIATIVE — $205,000 · Civil RightsTransgender Law Center — $200,000 · Civil RightsCOLOR OF CHANGEORG EDUCATION FUND — $190,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK — $175,000 · Civil RightsNew Orleans Workers Ctr For Racial Justice — $155,000 · Civil RightsAction Center on Race & the Economy Institute — $155,000 · Civil Rights+10 more — $597,500 · Civil Rights+10 morePROTEUS FUND INC — $1,195,000 · EducationPROTEUS FU…WORKERS DEFENSE PROJECT — $318,000 · EducationWORKERS DE…United for Respect Education Fund — $315,000 · EducationUnited for…NEW AMERICAN LEADERS INC — $267,000 · EducationNEW AMERIC…Movement Generation — $145,000 · EducationMovement G…WAY TO RISE — $105,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $85,000 · Education+1 more — $40,000 · EducationNEW VENTURE FUND — $1,355,000 · EnvironmentNEW VENTU…SOGOREA TE LAND TRUST — $375,000 · EnvironmentSOGOREA T…SUNRISE MOVEMENT EDUCATION FUND — $350,000 · EnvironmentSUNRISE M…+4 more — $165,000 · Environment+4 moreBOREALIS PHILANTHROPY — $775,000 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED ATLAS INC — $320,000 · Arts & CultureMIJENTE SUPPORT COMMITTEE — $305,000 · Arts & CultureALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC — $140,000 · Arts & CultureBlack Feminist Future Inc — $100,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $70,000 · Arts & CulturePEOPLE'S ACTION INSTITUTE — $470,000 · Community ImprovementPOWERSWITCH ACTION — $200,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION — $173,000 · Community ImprovementALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY — $165,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $150,000 · Community ImprovementMOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER — $115,000 · Community ImprovementFAIR COUNT INC — $100,000 · Community ImprovementTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $80,000 · Community Improvement+3 more — $103,000 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$6,140,500Other$9,623,015Civil Rights$4,055,500Education$2,470,000Environment$2,245,000Arts & Culture$1,710,000Community Improvement$1,556,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $2,105,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $1,355,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPROTEUS FUND INC — $1,195,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetGroundswell Fund — $1,060,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc — $840,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $805,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBOREALIS PHILANTHROPY — $775,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc — $748,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc — $745,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetNeighborhood Funders Group — $735,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetSolidaire Network Inc — $660,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetForward Together — $482,500 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetPEOPLE'S ACTION INSTITUTE — $470,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetSOGOREA TE LAND TRUST — $375,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetUNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY — $365,000 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetSUNRISE MOVEMENT EDUCATION FUND — $350,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetNATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT — $350,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC — $328,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC — $320,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWORKERS DEFENSE PROJECT — $318,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetUnited for Respect Education Fund — $315,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetDEMOS A NETWORK FOR IDEAS AND ACTION LTD — $310,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetMIJENTE SUPPORT COMMITTEE — $305,000 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetWESTERN STATES CENTER — $290,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetUNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC — $290,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetSOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC — $275,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetSPARK REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE NOW — $270,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetNEW AMERICAN LEADERS INC — $267,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetMS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC — $240,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION — $235,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCOLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION — $230,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR CULTURAL POWER — $211,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetCENTRO DE LOS DERECHOS DEL MIGRANTE INC — $210,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetJOLT INITIATIVE — $205,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetTransgender Law Center — $200,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPOWERSWITCH ACTION — $200,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetJobs with Justice Education Fund — $196,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCOLOR OF CHANGEORG EDUCATION FUND — $190,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetRockwood Leadership Institute — $175,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetNATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK — $175,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION — $173,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY — $165,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetBEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE — $160,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetNew Orleans Workers Ctr For Racial Justice — $155,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetAction Center on Race & the Economy Institute — $155,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCOLORADO PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE — $154,000 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMovement Generation — $145,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND
  • Who funds PROTEUS FUND INC
  • Who funds Groundswell Fund
  • Who funds Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BOREALIS PHILANTHROPY
  • Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc
  • Who funds National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc
  • Who funds Neighborhood Funders Group
  • Who funds Solidaire Network Inc
  • Who funds Forward Together
  • Who funds PEOPLE'S ACTION INSTITUTE
  • Who funds SOGOREA TE LAND TRUST
  • Who funds UNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY
  • Who funds SUNRISE MOVEMENT EDUCATION FUND
  • Who funds NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT
  • Who funds Womens March Network
  • Who funds BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC
  • Who funds WORKERS DEFENSE PROJECT
  • Who funds United for Respect Education Fund
  • Who funds DEMOS A NETWORK FOR IDEAS AND ACTION LTD
  • Who funds MIJENTE SUPPORT COMMITTEE
  • Who funds WESTERN STATES CENTER
  • Who funds UNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC
  • Who funds SOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC
  • Who funds SPARK REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE NOW
  • Who funds NEW AMERICAN LEADERS INC
  • Who funds MS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC
  • Who funds CHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds COLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR CULTURAL POWER
  • Who funds CENTRO DE LOS DERECHOS DEL MIGRANTE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC76.3× affinity47 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Impactassetsinc · Tides Foundation · New Venture Fund · Foundation to Promote Open Society · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · The Libra Foundation · Groundswell Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization General Service Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Community Catalyst Inc15% of income from government
  • Centro De Los Derechos Del Migrante Inc4% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to General Service Foundation?

Find your warmest path to General Service Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 147 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph