Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gelband Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$350k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.9MEducation$1.4MReligion$669kPhilanthropy$415kInternational$177kHuman Services$134kPublic Benefit$50kRecreation & Sports$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $605k
  • $250k+1 grant · $350k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JSURGE$350,000
Individual grant recipient$205,000
YUD FOUNDATION$100,000
SAMMY GELBAND FOUNDATION$100,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$100,000
JEWISH VOTERS UNITE$50,000
CONGREGATION OR HACHAIM ISRAEL$50,000
THE VALERIE FUND$25,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ$25,000
INDEPENDENT LIVING ALLIANCE$10,000
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$10,000
HOUSE OF JOYCE INTERNATIONAL INC$5,000
UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO$5,000
VISIONARY COUNCIL$1,000
AREIVIM INSTITUTE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INDEPENDENT LIVING ALLIANCE: $10k → 21%LIFe Camp: $5k → 5%AREIVIM INSTITUTE: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 24 repeat orgs$668k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
33

Total granted

$4.3M
$391k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+22%

Still filing today

46%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $277k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    5× · 2017–2021 · $650k · revenue +202% · 70% of their budget
  • TV
    THE VALERIE FUND
    8× · 2017–2024 · $235k · revenue +76%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $200k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • THE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC
    one grant, 2022 · $172k · revenue +18%
  • EF
    ELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue +3%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL - UJA NJ - JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
2
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
3
The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation Inc

The multiple myeloma research foundation (mmrf) is the largest nonprofit in the world solely focused on accelerating acurefor multiple myeloma patient. we drive the development and delivery of next-generation therapies, leverage data to…

Health
4
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

—
5
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
6
The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc

The mission of the breast cancer research foundation, inc. is to prevent and cure breast cancer by advancing the world's most promising research.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
8
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
9
Polybio Research Foundation Inc

We are a 501(c)3 transforming how complex chronic conditions like longcovid, me/cfs & post treatment lyme disease are studied, diagnosed, and treated. polybio was founded by three scientists with complementary expertise (neuroscience,…

—
10
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
11
Jgs Administrative Services Inc

To provide administrative support to jgs lifecare corporation.

Health
12
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Metrowest Nj; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
23/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $1,555,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJSURGE: $690,000 · OtherJSURGEUniversity of Michigan: $650,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $450,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTERCONGREGATION OR HACHAIM ISRAEL: $250,000 · OtherCONGREGATION OR HACHAIM ISRAELTHE VALERIE FUND: $235,353 · OtherTHE VALERIE FUND+35 more: $337,301 · Other+35 moreUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $200,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ: $100,000 · Philanthropy+3 more: $17,550 · PhilanthropySammy Gelband Foundation: $100,000 · HealthTHE CYAN GRAY HOPE FOUNDATION: $61,000 · HealthELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $40,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $35,000 · HealthPROJECT ALS INC: $10,000 · HealthBOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Health+4 more: $14,000 · HealthTHE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC: $172,000 · International+1 more: $5,519 · InternationalYud Foundation Inc: $100,000 · Religion+1 more: $500 · ReligionTeach for America Inc: $9,160 · EducationThe Unit Foundation Inc: $7,500 · EducationMRCC FOUNDATION INC: $2,398 · EducationArmed Services Arts Partnership: $1,000 · EducationINDEPENDENT LIVING ALLIANCE: $10,000 · Human ServicesLIFE CAMP INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesAREIVIM INSTITUTE: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$4,168,154Philanthropy$317,550Health$270,000International$177,519Religion$100,500Education$20,058Human Services$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Michigan: $650,000 over 5y, 70% of budgetTHE VALERIE FUND: $235,353 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $200,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC: $172,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetSammy Gelband Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetYud Foundation Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ: $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CYAN GRAY HOPE FOUNDATION: $61,000 over 6y, 63% of budgetELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ALS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDEPENDENT LIVING ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetTHE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $9,160 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOFT BONES INCTHE US: $7,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetGirl Rising: $5,519 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE CAMP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTEEN CANCER AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTAR LEGACY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE CHARITY INC: $2,550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAchilles International Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMRCC FOUNDATION INC: $2,398 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $1,825 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetArmed Services Arts Partnership: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAREIVIM INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILLBURN SHORT HILLS VOLUNTEER FIRST AID SQUAD INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUrban Youth Impact Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget101 EAST 69TH STREET CONSERVANCY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCamp Kinder Ring: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds THE VALERIE FUND ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Sammy Gelband Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Yud Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ ↗
  • Who funds THE CYAN GRAY HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ALS INC ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENT LIVING ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Unit Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOFT BONES INCTHE US ↗
  • Who funds Girl Rising ↗
  • Who funds LIFE CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds TEEN CANCER AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds STAR LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA13.9× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gelband Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gelband Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Life Camp Inc: 4% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gelband Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Gelband Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $1.1M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gelband Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph