· Public charity
Gary Sinise Foundation
At the GARY SINISE FOUNDATION, we support our nation's heroes, our veterans, military, those suffering from the invisible wounds of war, first responders, their families, and the families of fallen heroes.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 169 grants below total $16,963,328 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $27,513,288 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,549,960 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k18 grants · $118k
- $10k–50k102 grants · $2.6M
- $50k–250k40 grants · $3.7M
- $250k+9 grants · $10M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION | $4,500,000 |
| HYPERFORMANCE FOUNDATION | $2,000,000 |
| METANOIA FILMS LLC | $1,841,750 |
| FRIENDS OF FIREFIGHTERS INC | $570,000 |
| TRAINING TO PERFORM UNDER PRESSURE LLC | $427,254 |
| TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION | $350,000 |
| LIGHTHOUSE FAMILY RETREAT INC | $284,625 |
| NO GREATER SACRIFICE FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| CENTERSTONE | $250,000 |
| MES SERVICE COMPANY LLC | $229,920 |
| NEVER ALONE WIDOWS INC | $220,500 |
| VALOR PARTNERS FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| WARRIORS HEART VIRGINIA | $200,000 |
| THE GRATITUDE INITIATIVE | $150,000 |
| 2SERVE TOGETHER FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $18.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
112 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2025, 69 since wound down; 121 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8.7M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BCBOULDER CREST FOUNDATION4× · 2020–2025 · $18M · revenue +34%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION3× · 2019–2023 · $2.3M · revenue +58%
- FOFriends of Firefighters Inc8× · 2017–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +246% · 45% of their budget
Funded once
- ROREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADOone grant, 2024 · $500k
- WHWARRIORS HEARTone grant, 2024 · $428k
- UNUS NAVAL ACADEMYone grant, 2022 · $299k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
to prevent the loss of life and to control or reduce the loss of property by applying all of our knowledge and resources.
Volunteer fire department the help raise funds to lessen the burden on tax payers.
Mission for burnsville vfd burnsville wv the burnsville vfd provides fire protection fire safety and emergency rescue services to the citizens in its designated area. bvfd serves in a safe efficient manner serving all stakeholders.
WVFD provides fire suppression and rescue services to the communities of Nicholas County, WV and surrounding areas.
Provide volunteer firefighting and other emergency services for the community.
Volunteer fire department
The mission of the DUNCANVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT, INC. is the delivery of life safety services. The department provides 24-hour emergency response to a variety of critical situations, primarily fires.
Provide firefighting services for frelsburg, texas area.
Provide fire and rescue services to the citizens of our fire district
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leesburg Volunteer Fire Company Inc and the most unlike its peers is Francis P Chiaramonte Md Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 14% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
236 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 236 of the 570 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE AVALON NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Friends of Firefighters Inc ↗
- Who funds Never Alone Widows Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds No Greater Sacrifice Foundation ↗
- Who funds ANGELS OF AMERICA'S FALLEN ↗
- Who funds THE GRATITUDE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Fire FamilyTransportation Foundation LTD AKA FDNY Fire Family Transportation Fou ↗
- Who funds WARRIOR REUNION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE RICHARD NIXON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
- Who funds 2SERVE TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds CREATIVETS ↗
- Who funds Wreaths Across America ↗
- Who funds Lighthouse Family Retreat Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTERSTONE OF TENNESSEE INC ↗
- Who funds TAYA AND CHRIS KYLE FOUNDATION SERVICE FAMILY STRONG ↗
- Who funds VISION WARRIORS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds VALOR PARTNERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KNIGHTS OF HEROES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Independence Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN STUDIES CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wounded Warrior Project Inc · Tee It Up for the Troops Inc · The Leary Firefighters Foundation · Bob Woodruff Family Foundation Inc · Robert Irvine Foundation Inc · Midway Foundation Inc · Padres Foundation · Fisher House Foundation Inc · Veterans United Foundation · Fm Foundation · Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation Inc · Tc Energy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gary Sinise Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.