· Public charity
Robert Irvine Foundation Inc
The robert irvine foundation is a not-for-profit entity and is tax exempt under 501(c) (3) of the internal revenue code (irc).
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 19 grants below total $391,257 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $759,353 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $368,096 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $301k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAWS4PEOPLE INC | $75,000 |
| OLD GLORY HONOR FLIGHT INC | $30,000 |
| ALLIED FORCES FOUNDATION | $27,000 |
| HERO PUPS INC | $25,000 |
| IRONSTONE FARM | $25,000 |
| MARINE CORPS COMMUNITY SERVICES | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN VETERANS CENTER | $22,500 |
| SERVICE IMPACT FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| ERIE POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE | $20,000 |
| LIBERTY HOUSE | $20,000 |
| VETERANS NORTHEAST OUTREACH | $15,000 |
| HOMELAND HEROES FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| PATRIOT RESILIENT LEADER INSTITUTE | $13,500 |
| CHOW CORP | $13,000 |
| BULLARD FAMILY FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $473k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $116k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC5× · 2018–2023 · $150k · revenue +28%
- ESEaster Seals Serving DC MD VA Inc3× · 2021–2023 · $125k · revenue +33%
- THTHE HOMELAND HEROES FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $116k · revenue +56%
Funded once
- SOSPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +221%
- NSNAVY SUPPLY CORPS FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +11%
- FAFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INCone grant, 2023 · $54k · revenue +14%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To serve the crisis management, information and referral needs of america's veterans and their families.
Organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes for combat veterans to provide motivation, camaraderie, and to offer a release to cope with similar difficulties in a positive and therapeutic way. Providing safe, fun, and…
The Organization generates revenue and donates the proceeds to support service-disabled veterans and their families
American military family (amf) provides veterans and their families with assistance, whether it be emotional, physical, mental, or finanical, for their missing, suicidal, displaced or struggling hero.
To champion public awareness of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and challenges confronting our countrys heroes and rally support for shelter animal adoption by connecting heroes and companions.
Healing paws for warriors is a local veteran found / veteran led 501(c)(3) that provides rescue to trained service dogs to veterans faced with post traumatic stress disorder (ptsd), traumatic brain injury (tbi) and/or military sexual…
The Medal of Honor Foundation's mission and purpose is to provide funds to support the Congressional Medal of Honor Society. In doing so, the Foundation supports the Society in advancing their mission to perpetuate the Medal of Honor's…
To provide services for veterans.
Pets for Vets enriches the lives of veterans by creating a life-changing Super Bond with expertly selected and trained shelter or rescue pets. It provides ongoing expert support to ensure a reciprocal and thriving partnership at no cost to…
CFS seeks to inspire veterans through life-changing canine partnerships.
Transition for service members.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Operations Warrior Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Service Credit Union Impact Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PAWS4PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds USO OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON-BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC ↗
- Who funds Easter Seals Serving DC MD VA Inc ↗
- Who funds THE HOMELAND HEROES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NAVY SUPPLY CORPS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LIBERTY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds WARRIOR REUNION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VALOR SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of Firefighters Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN STUDIES CENTER ↗
- Who funds ALLIED FORCES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HERO PUPS INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Veterans Northeast Outreach Center Inc ↗
- Who funds HONOR FLIGHT NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds OUR COMMUNITY SALUTES USA INC ↗
- Who funds IM ABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Erie Police Athletic League ↗
- Who funds VOUCHERS FOR VETERANS ↗
- Who funds CONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MILITARY FAMILY ADVISORY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds MISSIONS OF HONOR INC ↗
- Who funds TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE RED SOX FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities ↗
- Who funds PATRIOT RESILIENT LEADER INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds SERVICE CREDIT UNION IMPACT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BUILDING DREAMS FOR MARINES INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN IN MILITARY SERVICE FOR AMERICA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHOW CORP ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Swimming With a Mission Inc · Gary Sinise Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Veterans United Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Network for Good · Enterprise Holdings Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Robert Irvine Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Easter Seals Serving Dc Md Va Inc — 29% of income from government
- Liberty House — 23% of income from government
- Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Red Sox Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Robert Irvine Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Robert Irvine Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.