Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Wounded Warrior Project Inc

Wounded warrior project (wwp) is the nation's leading veterans service organization providing post-9/11 veterans with life changing programs and services.

$51M
Granted FY2024still arriving
55
Grants FY2024still arriving
20
States reached
$14M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$195MHuman Services$86MEducation$38MPublic Safety & Disaster$15MPublic Benefit$5.7MEmployment$4.4MHousing & Shelter$3.3MArts & Culture$2.2MOther$0
02FY2024 · 55 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 55 grants below total $48,460,625 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $51,274,656 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,814,031 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k29 grants · $3.2M
  • $250k+25 grants · $45M
$200,000
Median grant
20
States reached
$527M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL PHYSICIANS ORGANIZATION INC$14,231,132
RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$8,052,190
EMORY UNIVERSITY$6,089,024
REGENTS UCLA DBA UCLA HEALTH SCIENCES DEVELOPMENT$4,716,812
US ARMY COMMUNITY & FAMILY SUPPORT$2,000,000
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$1,336,450
OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC$900,000
NATIONAL MILITARY FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC (NMFA)$750,000
TRAVIS MANION FOUNDATION (TMF)$750,000
BASTION COMMUNITY OF RESILIENCE$620,000
UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE (US VETS)$600,000
COHEN VETERANS NETWORK INC$600,000
THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION$500,000
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC$422,400
OPERATION HEALING FORCES INC$400,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $42.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT LONG TERM SUPPORT TRUST: $4.0M → 10%THE ROSIE NETWORK (TRN): $225k → 11%EOD WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $100k → 8%OPERATION HEALING FORCES INC: $400k → 12%AMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP: $4.5M → 18%THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $500k → 6%ARMED SERVICES YMCA OF THE USA: $150k → 7%BOULDER CREST RETREAT FOUNDATION: $430k → 7%MELWOOD HORTICULTURAL TRAINING CENTER INC: $200k → 11%SOLDIERS TO SIDELINES (STS): $175k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT LONG TERM SUPPORT TRUST: $4.0M → 10%THE ROSIE NETWORK (TRN): $125k → 11%OPERATION HEALING FORCES INC: $400k → 12%AMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP: $2.1M → 18%BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $300k → 7%CODE OF SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $200k → 9%SOLDIERS TO SIDELINES: $150k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT LONG TERM SUPPORT TRUST: $4.0M → 10%OPERATION HEALING FORCES INC: $400k → 12%AMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP: $1.0M → 18%BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $300k → 7%CODE OF SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $150k → 9%OPERATION HEALING FORCES INC: $300k → 12%AMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP: $500k → 18%BOULDER CREST RETREAT FOUNDATION: $200k → 7%AMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP: $500k → 18%BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION (BCF): $200k → 7%AMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP: $500k → 18%BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION (BCF): $200k → 7%AMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP: $250k → 18%BOULDER CREST RETREAT FOUNDATION: $200k → 7%AMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP: $250k → 18%SALUTE INC: $450k → 14%MILITARY FAMILY ADVISORY NETWORK: $275k → 9%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $300k → 16%SALUTE INC: $200k → 14%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $300k → 16%SALUTE INC: $150k → 14%UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE (US VETS): $600k → 14%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $300k → 16%UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE (US VETS): $400k → 14%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $200k → 16%UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE: $400k → 14%UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE (US VETS): $400k → 14%UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE (USVETS): $400k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $5.2M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $1.3M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $975k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
WA
MT
IL
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$350M · 80 repeat orgs$5.2M to everyone else

80 repeat relationships — 48 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

80
37

Total granted

$350M
$4.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+49%

Still filing today

94%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $875k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPublic BenefitHealthEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RU
    Rush University Medical Center
    8× · 2017–2024 · $56M · revenue +51%
  • EU
    Emory University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $40M · revenue +80%
  • AW
    AMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $9.6M · revenue +48% · 58% of their budget

Funded once

  • CV
    COHEN VETERANS BIOSCIENCE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1.2M · revenue -80%
  • BT
    BE THE CHANGE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $400k
  • BS
    BLUE STAR FAMILIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $350k · revenue +570%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
NextOp Inc

NextOp helps place talented enlisted service members and veterans into civilian careers through highly individualized preparation and an array of programming.

Public Benefit
2
Special Operators Transition Foundation Inc

The special operators transition foundation ("sotf") assists special operation forces veterans transition from the military into their next successful career.

Public Benefit
3
Military Officers Association of America

Preserve and protect earned benefits for our uniformed services, veterans, their families, and surviving spouses through advocacy, leadership, education and service. provide first-class service to our members. we are the leading voice on…

Public Benefit
4
Usvets - Texas

The successful transition of u.s. military veterans and their families through the provision of housing, counseling, career development and comprehensive support.

Human Services
5
Hire Heroes Usa Inc

Hire heroes usa empowers u.s. military members, veterans and military spouses to succeed in the civilian workforce. as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, hire heroes usa's services are provided at no cost to the client.

Education
6
Military Wellness Initiative
Public Benefit
7
National Veterans Hiring Association

The support of our sponsors allows veterans to empower veterans, military spouses, and transitioning service members to find meaningful employment opportunities each year. Committed to meaningful opportunity employment advisory councils…

Public Benefit
8
Amvets (American Veterans)

Amvets is a veterans service organization whose members, having served or now serving in the u.s. armed forces, are united to uphold and defend the constitution of the united states; to safeguard the principles of freedom, liberty and…

—
9
Wounded Warrior Project Inc

Wounded warrior project (wwp) is the nation's leading veterans service organization, focused on the total well-being of post - 9/11 veterans, active-duty service members, and their families. our programs, advocacy, and awareness efforts…

Human Services
10
Vetality Corp

Services for veterans

—
11
22ZERO Follow Me Inc

To heal and train veterans, first responders, and gold star families using a non-invasive, non-clinical, peer-to-peer, holistic intervention, to save lives and families of our heroes, while ending suicide and trauma with the trauma…

Health
12
The Veterans and First Responders
Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Operations Warrior Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Cohen Veterans Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Animal Rescue and ShelterCommunity College Foundatio…Christian Youth CampsAddiction Recovery ServicesCommunity FoundationsYmca Youth DevelopmentCommunity Arts CentersCommunity FoundationsCancer Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyMilitary Veterans SupportIndependent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%53%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%7%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%60%10–20yr16%7%20–35yr13%2%35–55yr16%30%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%2/123
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,442

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

114 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 114 of the 124 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

15
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
32
Early backer (in before they grew)
110/114
Grantees still filing
77/114
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $94,089,596 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA — $36,537,387 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIATEAM RUBICON INC — $7,578,947 · Other+40 more — $22,750,692 · Other+40 moreRush University Medical Center — $56,221,344 · HealthRush University Med…HEAD STRONG PROJECT INC — $2,500,000 · Health+12 more — $3,691,097 · Health+12 moreEmory University — $39,981,810 · EducationEmory Universi…SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $2,725,000 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVE…+7 more — $2,865,000 · Education+7 moreWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT LT SUPPORT TRUST — $12,001,498 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRI…AMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP INC — $9,648,415 · Human ServicesAMERICA'S WAR…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $7,595,181 · Human ServicesAmerican Nati…UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE — $2,200,000 · Human ServicesBOULDER CREST FOUNDATION — $1,930,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION HEALING FORCES INC — $1,650,000 · Human Services+26 more — $8,532,640 · Human Services+26 moreNATIONAL MILITARY FAMILY ASSOCIATION — $6,305,000 · Public BenefitCARING FOR MILITARY FAMILIES THE ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATION — $4,950,000 · Public BenefitCombined Arms — $3,663,772 · Public BenefitTEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC — $2,250,000 · Public BenefitBASTION COMMUNITY OF RESILIENCE — $1,947,290 · Public Benefit+15 more — $3,801,714 · Public BenefitTHE MISSION CONTINUES — $5,450,000 · EmploymentVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS FOUNDATION — $2,263,145 · EmploymentTHE HONOR FOUNDATION INC — $1,750,000 · EmploymentDOG TAG INC — $1,160,000 · EmploymentOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC — $8,650,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $200,000 · Community Improvement
Other$160,956,622Health$62,412,441Education$45,571,810Human Services$43,557,734Public Benefit$22,917,776Employment$10,623,145Community Improvement$8,850,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRush University Medical Center — $56,221,344 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetEmory University — $39,981,810 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT LT SUPPORT TRUST — $12,001,498 over 3y, 52% of budgetAMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP INC — $9,648,415 over 8y, 58% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC — $8,650,000 over 7y, 6.7% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $7,595,181 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC — $7,578,947 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetNATIONAL MILITARY FAMILY ASSOCIATION — $6,305,000 over 7y, 53% of budgetTHE MISSION CONTINUES — $5,450,000 over 8y, 16% of budgetCARING FOR MILITARY FAMILIES THE ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATION — $4,950,000 over 8y, 23% of budgetTravis Manion Foundation — $4,375,000 over 7y, 10% of budgetCombined Arms — $3,663,772 over 5y, 67% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC — $2,923,750 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $2,725,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHEAD STRONG PROJECT INC — $2,500,000 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS FOUNDATION — $2,263,145 over 6y, 9.2% of budgetTEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC — $2,250,000 over 6y, 9.8% of budgetUNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE — $2,200,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetBASTION COMMUNITY OF RESILIENCE — $1,947,290 over 5y, 37% of budgetBOULDER CREST FOUNDATION — $1,930,000 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetTHE HONOR FOUNDATION INC — $1,750,000 over 6y, 9.4% of budgetOPERATION HEALING FORCES INC — $1,650,000 over 5y, 8.8% of budgetSALUTE INC — $1,385,000 over 6y, 39% of budgetMILITARY CHILD EDUCATION COALITION — $1,350,000 over 7y, 7.4% of budgetCOHEN VETERANS BIOSCIENCE INC — $1,235,880 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetDOG TAG INC — $1,160,000 over 6y, 18% of budgetGREEN BERET FOUNDATION — $1,100,000 over 4y, 9.8% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,050,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCOHEN VETERANS NETWORK INC — $1,025,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC — $1,020,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetOUR MILITARY KIDS INC — $975,000 over 7y, 10% of budgetMILITARY FAMILY ADVISORY NETWORK INC — $950,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetFARMER VETERAN COALITION — $800,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $800,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPSYCHARMOR INSTITUTE INC — $747,900 over 4y, 11% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $614,375 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetVIETNAM VETERANS OF SAN DIEGO DBA VETERANS VILLAGE OF SAN DIEGO — $600,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $535,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetUS Chamber of Commerce Foundation — $525,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSoldiers to Sidelines — $525,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetANCHORAGE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC — $500,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATION — $500,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetCAMP CORRAL — $500,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetWARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC — $490,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetHope For The Warriors — $480,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetCode of Support Foundation — $450,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetTHREE RANGERS FOUNDATION — $450,000 over 4y, 62% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT LT SUPPORT TRUST ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MILITARY FAMILY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MISSION CONTINUES ↗
  • Who funds CARING FOR MILITARY FAMILIES THE ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Travis Manion Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Combined Arms ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HEAD STRONG PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds BASTION COMMUNITY OF RESILIENCE ↗
  • Who funds BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HONOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION HEALING FORCES INC ↗
  • Who funds SALUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds MILITARY CHILD EDUCATION COALITION ↗
  • Who funds COHEN VETERANS BIOSCIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds DOG TAG INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN BERET FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COHEN VETERANS NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR MILITARY KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds MILITARY FAMILY ADVISORY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds FARMER VETERAN COALITION ↗
  • Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PSYCHARMOR INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VIETNAM VETERANS OF SAN DIEGO DBA VETERANS VILLAGE OF SAN DIEGO ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bob Woodruff Family F…Veterans United Found…Disabled American Vet…Disabled Veterans Nat…Caring for Military F…Be the Change IncVetsaid IncGary Sinise FoundationPga Tour Charities IncRumsfeld FoundationCohen Veterans Networ…The Community Foundat…
Bob Woodruff Family Foundation IncNY49.7× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bob Woodruff Family Foundation Inc · Veterans United Foundation · Disabled American Veterans (DAV) Charitable Service Trust · Disabled Veterans National Foundation · Caring for Military Families the Elizabeth Dole Foundation · Be the Change Inc · Vetsaid Inc · Gary Sinise Foundation · Pga Tour Charities Inc · Rumsfeld Foundation · Cohen Veterans Network Inc · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wounded Warrior Project Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Operation New Uniform Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Melwood Horticultural Training Center Inc — 73% of income from government
  • Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc — 46% of income from government
  • Warrior Canine Connection Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Cohen Veterans Network Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Yellow Ribbon Fund Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 124 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home