Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gary Broad Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$835k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Animals$1.4MEducation$1.2MHealth$1.2MHuman Services$775kFood & Nutrition$470kEnvironment$445kYouth Development$435kArts & Culture$200kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k28 grants · $785k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$30,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$6.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK$50,000
ASPCA$40,000
ANIMAL SAMARITANS SPCA$40,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$40,000
WINDWARD SCHOOL$40,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA$40,000
UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I FOUNDATION$40,000
EISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER$35,000
ALLIES FOR EVERY CHILD$30,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$30,000
KIDS & HORSES$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
PALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM$30,000
RACE FOR EDUCATION$30,000
MUTTVILLE$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $510k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $30k → 6%ALLIES FOR EVERY CHILD: $30k → 14%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $30k → 6%ALLIES FOR EVERY CHILD: $30k → 14%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $30k → 6%WESTSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $30k → 14%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $30k → 6%ALLIES FOR EVERY CHILD: $30k → 14%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 6%WESTSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $30k → 14%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 6%ALLIES FOR EVERY CHILD: $30k → 14%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND USA: $25k → 6%ALLIES FOR EVERY CHILD: $30k → 14%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 6%ALLIES FOR EVERY CHILD: $30k → 14%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 6%WESTSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
NV
PA
CA
KY
VA
DC
HI

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.1M · 29 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against -47% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
2

Total granted

$6.1M
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
-47%

Still filing today

79%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EM
    Eisenhower Medical Center
    9× · 2017–2025 · $369k · revenue +94%
  • WS
    WINDWARD SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $355k · revenue +95%
  • AS
    Animal Samaritans
    9× · 2017–2025 · $335k · revenue +158%

Funded once

  • CE
    CALIFORNIA EQUINE RETIREMENT FDN INC
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • SA
    SAVING AMERICA'S MUSTANGS
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
3
The Adoptable Dog
Animals
4
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
5
Wolfe Ranch Rescue
Animals
6
Saving Saluda Strays
Animals
7
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
8
Leave No Paws Behind Inc

Conduct animal rescues, rehabilitation and rehome senior animals abandoned to the shelter's system.

Animals
9
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
10
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
11
Mountain View Animal Rescue

Rescue of abused or abandoned animals

Animals
12
Asian Dogs Rescue Allies

To rescue at risk k-9s from asia.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Saving America's Mustangs. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Pantries & AssistanceYouth Sports Booster Organi…Community Arts OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionChild and Family ServicesLand Conservation Organizat…Independent K-8 SchoolsCommunity Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%27%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr11%27%35–55yr13%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr17%30%20–35yr11%34%35–55yr13%20%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,953

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA — $335,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLAPegasus Therapeutic Riding Center of Coachella Valley — $265,000 · OtherPegasus Therapeutic Riding Center of …JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $265,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICEST VINCENT MEALS ON WHEELS — $245,000 · OtherST VINCENT MEALS ON WHEELSIndividual grant recipient — $210,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHAZELDEN BETTY FORD CENTER FOUNDATION — $175,000 · OtherHAZELDEN BETTY FORD CENTER FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $155,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM — $200,000 · OtherPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUMACCESS YOUTH ACADEMY — $100,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS KENTUCKY INC — $70,000 · Other+1 more — $30,000 · OtherWINDWARD SCHOOL — $355,000 · EducationWINDWARD SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION — $310,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII F…EDWIN J GREGSON FOUNDATION — $265,000 · EducationEDWIN J GREGSON FOUNDA…THE RACE FOR EDUCATION INC — $255,000 · EducationTHE RACE FOR EDUCATION…+1 more — $25,000 · EducationAnimal Samaritans — $335,000 · AnimalsAnimal SamaritansMUTTVILLE — $265,000 · AnimalsMUTTVILLETHRIVE ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $135,000 · AnimalsTHRIVE ANIMAL RESCUE…THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $100,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY…SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE — $80,000 · AnimalsSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA …CALIFORNIA RETIREMENT MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT — $75,000 · AnimalsCALIFORNIA RETIREMEN…PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC — $65,000 · AnimalsPEOPLE FOR THE ETHIC…CALIFORNIA PAWS RESCUE — $60,000 · Animals+1 more — $20,000 · AnimalsEisenhower Medical Center — $369,000 · HealthEisenhower Me…KIDS AND HORSES INC — $265,000 · HealthKIDS AND HORS…RIDE TO FLY — $90,000 · HealthRIDE TO FLYAllies for Every Child Inc — $265,000 · Human ServicesAllies fo…ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $245,000 · Human ServicesISRAEL GU…WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $310,000 · EnvironmentJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK — $225,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$2,050,000Education$1,210,000Animals$1,135,000Health$724,000Human Services$510,000Environment$310,000Food & Nutrition$225,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEisenhower Medical Center — $369,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWINDWARD SCHOOL — $355,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAnimal Samaritans — $335,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $310,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION — $310,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMUTTVILLE — $265,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetPegasus Therapeutic Riding Center of Coachella Valley — $265,000 over 9y, 17% of budgetEDWIN J GREGSON FOUNDATION — $265,000 over 9y, 15% of budgetAllies for Every Child Inc — $265,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetKIDS AND HORSES INC — $265,000 over 9y, 13% of budgetTHE RACE FOR EDUCATION INC — $255,000 over 9y, 39% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $245,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK — $225,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM — $200,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHRIVE ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $135,000 over 9y, 5.8% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetACCESS YOUTH ACADEMY — $100,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetRIDE TO FLY — $90,000 over 7y, 10% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE — $80,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA RETIREMENT MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT — $75,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS KENTUCKY INC — $70,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC — $65,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA PAWS RESCUE — $60,000 over 7y, 17% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center
  • Who funds WINDWARD SCHOOL
  • Who funds Animal Samaritans
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MUTTVILLE
  • Who funds Pegasus Therapeutic Riding Center of Coachella Valley
  • Who funds EDWIN J GREGSON FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Allies for Every Child Inc
  • Who funds KIDS AND HORSES INC
  • Who funds THE RACE FOR EDUCATION INC
  • Who funds ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND
  • Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK
  • Who funds PALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM
  • Who funds THRIVE ANIMAL RESCUE INC
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds ACCESS YOUTH ACADEMY
  • Who funds RIDE TO FLY
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA RETIREMENT MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS KENTUCKY INC
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA PAWS RESCUE
  • Who funds SAVING AMERICA'S MUSTANGS
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA13.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gary Broad Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Gary Broad Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Gary Broad Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph