Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gary a Hansberger Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$2.6MCommunity Improvement$1.3MHealth$126kCrime & Legal$106kAnimals$38kYouth Development$36kHuman Services$22kReligion$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $300k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
$40,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COACHELLA VALLEY YOUTH GOLF FOUNDATION$1,000,000
FIRST TEE OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY$320,000
DR YOMI DESERT CLASSIC FOUNDATION$300,000
THE SUSAN G KOMEN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION$100,000
CDGA FOUNDATION$100,000
PGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION$100,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
MAX MCGRAW WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$15,000
IL PGA FOUNDATION$10,000
DIAMOND WILLOW MINISTRIES$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OUR ARMED FORCES$3,160
CPGA FOUNDATION$3,000
MENDED HEARTS OF COACHELLA VALLEY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 40%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%DIAMOND WILLOW MINISTRIES: $10k → 40%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 10 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$2.8M
$35k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsCivil RightsHuman ServicesPublic BenefitHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FT
    FIRST TEE OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.2M
  • FT
    FIRST TEE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $805k
  • CF
    CDGA FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $300k

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FIRST TEE
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • MZ
    MATTY Z FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sage Valley Golf Foundation
Recreation & Sports
2
The Connecticut Golf Foundation Inc the First Tee of Connecticut

To impact the lives of young people throughout connecticut by providing educational programs that build character, instill life-enhancing values and promote healthy choices through the game of golf.

Youth Development
3
Del Rio Cc Foundation Dba First Tee Central Valley

To positively impact the lives of central valley area youth by providing educational programs that ensure character development and the mastery of life skills through instruction in the game of golf.

Recreation & Sports
4
Johnny Miller Champ Foundation

Advocate junior golfers and golf programs

Youth Development
5
The Watson Youth Golf Foundation
Recreation & Sports
6
Hollywood Golf Club Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Cff Conservation Foundation

The organization is dedicated to education programming surrounding animal relocation and conservation efforts, building partnerships and projects that promote outdoor recreation, conservation, and charity toward organizations or…

Animals
8
Colorado Wildlife Heritage Foundation Inc

The mission of the Colorado Wildlife Heritage Foundation is to provide a legacy for Colorado through support of environmental stewardship conservation of wildlife and the protection of critical habitat.

Animals
9
Conway Farms Golf Club Foundation

Provide educational scholarships

Education
10
Hilton Head Island Foundation to Support Youth Sports Inc

The first tee helps shape the lives of kids and teens from all walks of life by introducing them to values inherent in the game of golf. values like integrity, respect and perseverance

Recreation & Sports
11
Cw Driver Foundation
Education
12
Chicago District Golf Association Foundation

Founded in 1944 for returning veterans from world war ii, the cdga foundation secures and administers philanthropic support to advance the mission and programs of the cdga. we recognize the life-changing benefits of golf and the importance…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pga Tour First Tee Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST TEE OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY: $1,222,600 · OtherFIRST TEE OF THE COACHELLA VALLEYFIRST TEE FOUNDATION: $805,000 · OtherFIRST TEE FOUNDATIONDR YOMI DESERT CLASSIC FOUNDATION: $300,000 · OtherDR YOMI DESERT CLASSIC FOUNDATIONCDGA FOUNDATION: $300,000 · OtherCDGA FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $190,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+9 more: $197,000 · Other+9 moreCOACHELLA VALLEY YOUTH GOLF FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · Recreation & SportsCOACHELLA VALLEY YOUTH GOLF F…PGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsPGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION…+1 more: $36,000 · Recreation & SportsCASA KANE COUNTY: $106,000 · Civil RightsRush Copley Foundation: $26,000 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF OUR ARMED FORCES WALT VANBENTHYSEN: $19,760 · Public BenefitDIAMOND WILLOW MINISTRIES: $10,000 · Human ServicesDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$3,014,600Recreation & Sports$1,136,000Civil Rights$106,000Health$26,000Public Benefit$19,760Human Services$10,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOACHELLA VALLEY YOUTH GOLF FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetCASA KANE COUNTY: $106,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetMax McGraw Wildlife Foundation: $37,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGIVE ME A CHANCE FOUNDATION: $36,000 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetRush Copley Foundation: $26,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF OUR ARMED FORCES WALT VANBENTHYSEN: $19,760 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COACHELLA VALLEY YOUTH GOLF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CASA KANE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds PGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GIVE ME A CHANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Rush Copley Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OUR ARMED FORCES WALT VANBENTHYSEN ↗
  • Who funds DIAMOND WILLOW MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gary a Hansberger Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gary a Hansberger Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Gary a Hansberger Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Gary a Hansberger Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gary a Hansberger’s filings →

    More from the funding graph