Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Garrett Walker Joshua 1-9 Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Education$15kAnimals$8kReligion$8kHuman Services$2kYouth Development$2kRecreation & Sports$867Food & Nutrition$708Health$600Other$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$200
Median grant
5
States reached
$115k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GLENELG HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLORSHIP$2,059
MT AIRY NET$708
Individual grant recipient$700
THE FOXIE G FOUNDATION$350
TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$237
SECOND CHANCE GARAGE$209
222 MUSCLE THE SOPHIA$200
FREDERICK RESCUE MISSION$200
CROSSED BRIDGES$200
SMALL MIRACLES CAT & DOG RESCUE$200
DAYS END HORSE RESCUE$200
Individual grant recipient$200
HOPE WORKS OF HOWARD COUNTY$154
SAVING GRACE ANIMAL RESCUE$150
KNINE RESCUE$150
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $463) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Caring Matters: $100 → 8%SECOND CHANCE GARAGE: $209 → 6%HOPE WORKS OF HOWARD COUNTY: $154 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
SD
VA
MD
TN
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Garrett Walker Joshua 1-9 Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 76% of the giving stays in MD; read by stated purpose it is 69% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Garrett Walker Joshua 1-9 Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8k · 5 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
14

Total granted

$8k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+19%

Still filing today

60%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesEducationHealthPublic BenefitHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1k · revenue +83%
  • HF
    HIVES FOR HEROES
    2× · 2022–2023 · $353 · revenue ×313
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $250 · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • FF
    FREDERICK FLIGHT CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • FT
    Flight Training Center FBO Colin Ha
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • FQ
    FE QUE TRANSFORMA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Meows and Mutts Rescue

We are an animal rescue who takes dogs and cats from high kill shelters, off the streets and owner surrenders and get them vetted and adopted and we transport them out of high volume areas to the northeast.

Animals
2
Feral Cat Rescue Inc

Feral Cat Rescue provides support for spay and neutering feral cats in St. Mary's County, Maryland. Expenses include spay, neutering, vaccination against rabies and distemper, micro chipping, parasite control both internal and external and…

Animals
3
Furget Me Not Inc

Furget Me Not Rescue is a nonprofit animal rescue organization dedicated to rescuing, rehabilitating, and rehoming abandoned, neglected, and at-risk animals. The organization provides veterinary care, foster placement, and adoption…

Animals
4
Heavens Home Rescue Inc

Heavens Home Rescue saves dogs and cats from high kill shelters. We focus our efforts on abuse cases feral dogs hospice cases and pregnant and nursing dogs and cats and the prevention of cruelty to animals.

Animals
5
Fred's Mission Rescue and Sanctuary

Rescue dogs, which includes housing, vetting, and transport.

Animals
6
Fifis Friends Inc

Rescue dogs being neglected, unwanted or in danger of being euthanized and find them loving caring homes.

Animals
7
Heaven After Hell Rescue

We are an animal rescue that believes in giving shelter animals a voice and happy home. We take in unwanted or abused dogs and cats from local high kill shelters we prepare them for adoption and find the perfect match for the adoptive…

Animals
8
Central Virginia Regional Rescue

Dog and cat rescue

Animals
9
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
10
Moonracer No Kill Animal Rescue

Moonracer No Kill Animal Rescue, Inc. is a non-profit organization dedicated to the rescue, care and rehabilitation of homeless pets in order to find them good and safe homes. We believe that all animals deserve love, dignity, proper care…

11
Misfit Angels Rescue

Misfit angels rescue mission is to rescue, rehab and ultimately rehome dogs. our mostly large and xl dogs come from high kill shelters, city/county shelters, stray and owner surrenders without our own state. misfit completely vets, from…

Animals
12
Rescuecats Inc

Rescuecats is a 501(c)3 nonprofit, state-licensed, no-kill group dedicated to rescuing owner released and homeless cats & dogs and placing them into new homes.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Frederick Rescue Mission Inc and the most unlike its peers is Metro Animal Shelter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%18%<5yr16%14%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr11%9%35–55yr16%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%42%<5yr16%4%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%35%20–35yr11%2%35–55yr16%3%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 18% of your grantees by number, and just 42% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
14%
5,903/41,827

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $5,479 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFREDERICK FLIGHT CENTER — $5,000 · OtherFREDERICK FLIGHT CENTERFlight Training Center FBO Colin Ha — $5,000 · OtherFlight Training Center FBO Colin HaFE QUE TRANSFORMA INC — $5,000 · OtherFE QUE TRANSFORMA INCDAMASCUS ROAD COMMUNITY CHURCH INC — $2,500 · OtherDAMASCUS ROAD COMMUNITY CHURCH INCIndividual grant recipient — $2,266 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGLENELG HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLORSHIP — $2,059 · OtherGLENELG HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLORSHIPHoward Community College FBO Jimmy — $2,000 · OtherHoward Community College FBO Jimmy+16 more — $5,517 · Other+16 moreSMALL MIRACLES CAT AND DOG RESCUE INC — $1,050 · AnimalsTHE FOXIE G FOUNDATION INC — $350 · AnimalsFRECKLES FOUNDATION & ANIMAL RESCUE — $115 · AnimalsGENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD — $100 · AnimalsMETRO ANIMAL SHELTER — $100 · AnimalsColby's Crew Rescue — $100 · AnimalsSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $1,037 · EducationCITY YOUTH MATRIX — $150 · EducationSECOND CHANCES GARAGE INC — $209 · Human ServicesHOPEWORKS OF HOWARD COUNTY INC — $154 · Human ServicesCARINGMATTERS INC — $100 · Human ServicesHIVES FOR HEROES — $353 · Public BenefitST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $250 · HealthNATIONAL PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $100 · HealthFREDERICK RESCUE MISSION INC — $200 · Housing & Shelter
Other$34,821Animals$1,815Education$1,187Human Services$463Public Benefit$353Health$350Housing & Shelter$200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSMALL MIRACLES CAT AND DOG RESCUE INC — $1,050 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $1,037 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMT AIRY NET INC — $708 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FOXIE G FOUNDATION INC — $350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND CHANCES GARAGE INC — $209 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREDERICK RESCUE MISSION INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSED BRIDGES INC — $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOPEWORKS OF HOWARD COUNTY INC — $154 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YOUTH MATRIX — $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRECKLES FOUNDATION & ANIMAL RESCUE — $115 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetI Believe in Me Inc — $106 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEAGUE OF DREAMS INC — $103 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARINGMATTERS INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETRO ANIMAL SHELTER — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColby's Crew Rescue — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ausherman Family FoundationMD17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ausherman Family Foundation · Delaplaine Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Frederick County Maryland Inc · United Way of Frederick County Inc · Ausherman Family Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Garrett Walker Joshua 1-9 Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 29%
  • Hopeworks of Howard County Inc29% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Garrett Walker Joshua 1-9 Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Garrett Walker Joshua 1-9 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph