Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gail Anita Flagler Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$240k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$495kHealth$475kArts & Culture$400kAnimals$220kInternational$125kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kYouth Development$80kPublic Benefit$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
$30,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GARY SINISE FOUNDATION$50,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$50,000
WTTW$50,000
THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY$30,000
WATTS OF LOVE$20,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$20,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $170k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Guiding Eyes for the Blind: $15k → 9%Wounded Warrior Project: $35k → 14%Guiding Eyes for the Blind: $15k → 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25k → 14%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $15k → 9%Wounded Warrior Project: $25k → 14%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $15k → 9%Wounded Warrior Project: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IN
CA
VA
AZ
KS
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 12 repeat orgs$315k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
10

Total granted

$1.6M
$305k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+38%

Still filing today

75%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WT
    WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $350k · revenue +13%
  • GARY SINISE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2025 · $250k · revenue +99%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $240k · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • IW
    INFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF CHICAGOgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +44%
  • OI
    OPRF INFANT WELFARE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • EC
    EDGAR CAYCE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +69% · 37% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
2
Women's Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

As america's first animal shelter, founded in 1869, women's humane society dba women's animal center (wac), assists people in the community, saves the lives of animals, and improves the health of pets through its shelter and adoptions…

Animals
3
Wildlife Sos

Protecting india's precious wildlife from poaching, habitat loss, and human exploitation since 1995.

Animals
4
Danbury Animal Welfare Society

Danbury animal welfare society , inc.(daws) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of animals in our community and beyond. we promote responsible pet guardianship and the humane treatment of animals, and work toward…

Animals
5
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
6
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
7
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
8
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
9
International Guiding Eyes Inc Dba Guide Dogs of America

The organizations mission is to transform lives through partnerships with service dogs.the organization provides professionally trained, expertly matched service dogs and personalized instruction in their care and use to people who are…

Human Services
10
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
11
K9S for Warriors Research Institute Inc

Research and advocacy for veterans with post-traumatic stress and the prevention of veteran suicide.

—
12
Canine Companions for Independence Inc

Canine companions for independence is a nonprofit organization that enhances the lives of people with disabilities by providing expertly trained service dogs and ongoing support to ensure quality partnerships, at no cost to clients.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Big Bear Valley. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Infant Welfare Society: $125,000 · OtherInfant Welfare SocietyTunnel 2 Towers Foundation: $100,000 · OtherTunnel 2 Towers FoundationINFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF CHICAGO: $50,000 · OtherINFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF CHICAGOOPRF INFANT WELFARE SOCIETY: $50,000 · OtherOPRF INFANT WELFARE SOCIETYEDGAR CAYCE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherEDGAR CAYCE FOUNDATIONHEPHZIBAH HOUSE INC: $30,000 · OtherSHRINER'S CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $25,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $80,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGOPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $40,000 · OtherPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS+3 more: $40,000 · Other+3 moreWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $350,000 · Arts & CultureWINDOW TO THE WORLD …GARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $250,000 · PhilanthropyGARY SINISE FO…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $240,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILD…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $155,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARR…GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES…THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $115,000 · AnimalsTHE ELEPHAN…VESTED INTEREST IN K9S INC: $40,000 · AnimalsVESTED INTE…ANIMAL CARE LEAGUE: $20,000 · AnimalsANIMAL CARE…NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR RESCUED ANIMALS DBA TIGER CREEK ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $15,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL FO…+1 more: $5,000 · AnimalsWATTS OF LOVE: $125,000 · International
Other$590,000Arts & Culture$350,000Philanthropy$250,000Health$240,000Human Services$215,000Animals$195,000International$125,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $350,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $240,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $155,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWATTS OF LOVE: $125,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $115,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $80,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetINFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF CHICAGO: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEDGAR CAYCE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetVESTED INTEREST IN K9S INC: $40,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $40,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetANIMAL CARE LEAGUE: $20,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR RESCUED ANIMALS DBA TIGER CREEK ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF BIG BEAR VALLEY: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds WATTS OF LOVE ↗
  • Who funds THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds INFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds EDGAR CAYCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VESTED INTEREST IN K9S INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL CARE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR RESCUED ANIMALS DBA TIGER CREEK ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BIG BEAR VALLEY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY11.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gail Anita Flagler Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gail Anita Flagler Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gail Anita Flagler’s filings →

More from the funding graph