· Private foundation
G & R Quiat Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k27 grants · $111k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $55k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MERCY CORPS | $12,500 |
| JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY | $11,000 |
| WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FDN | $11,000 |
| ACLU FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| JFSLA JEWISH FAMILY SVCES LA HOPE | $10,000 |
| DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION INC | $7,500 |
| ADL - ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE | $7,500 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD ROCKY MOUNTAIN | $7,500 |
| DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE | $5,500 |
| ENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO | $5,500 |
| FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES | $5,500 |
| MAXFUND | $5,500 |
| THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY | $5,500 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $5,500 |
| LA CLINICA TEPEYAC INC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $151k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
38 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMercy Corps8× · 2018–2025 · $143k · revenue +22%
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC7× · 2018–2025 · $72k · revenue +89%- EFEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION8× · 2018–2025 · $57k · revenue +112%
Funded once
- TCTHE COMMUNICATION FDN OF BOULDER COUNTYone grant, 2022 · $50k
- DWDOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS YEMENone grant, 2021 · $12k
- CICOLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +31%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.
Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.
We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
To preserve and enhance the quality of life at home, with dignity and care.
Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Dumb Friends League and the most unlike its peers is Washington Ensemble Theatre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds PROJECT ANGEL FOOD ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds ENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO ↗
- Who funds DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE MAXFUND INC ↗
- Who funds BOULDER SHELTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
- Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
- Who funds PROJECT ANGEL HEART ↗
- Who funds Rose Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds King County Sexual Assault Resource Center ↗
- Who funds COLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION ↗
- Who funds LA CLINICA TEPEYAC ↗
- Who funds LOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · The Denver Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Tides Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization G & R Quiat Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- The Home for Little Wanderers Inc — 38% of income from government
- Fenway Community Health Center Inc — 27% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to G & R Quiat Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to G & R Quiat Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.