· Public charity
Fund for Southern Communities Inc
The Fund for Southern Communities is a public foundation that supports and unites organizations and donors working to create just and sustainable communities that are free of oppression and that embrace and celebrate all people.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 22 grants below total $469,276 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $506,695 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $37,419 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $449k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TRANS FORMING | $40,163 |
| BLACK GIRLS FILM CAMP | $37,500 |
| NEW VISION MSK | $37,500 |
| HH SISTERS HAZLEHURST HAILE | $30,370 |
| 3D GIRLS | $30,000 |
| BLACK GIRLS SMILE INC | $30,000 |
| FIND DESIGN | $30,000 |
| HOPE FOR YOUTH INC | $27,750 |
| KOINONIA COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS | $27,750 |
| EVERY BLACK GIRL | $27,000 |
| E3 EDUCATE EMPOWER ELEVATE | $22,500 |
| THE BEAUTIFUL PROJECT | $18,500 |
| THE GENERATION GAP | $17,000 |
| Gifted Girls of Grace Inc | $15,000 |
| The Sally R Brasley Fnd | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $555k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
29 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $213k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SASOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC3× · 2021–2023 · $579k · revenue +29%
- ARAlternate RootsInc7× · 2017–2023 · $55k · revenue +54%
- MSMOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE2× · 2021–2022 · $50k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- FIFANNIELOUHAMER INSTADVOCACYone grant, 2022 · $68k
- CWColumbus Wellness Center Outreach & Prevention Projectone grant, 2022 · $66k · revenue -97%
- MIMAKE-IT-CLICK INCone grant, 2022 · $66k · 51% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Black Girls Cook aims to empower and inspire inner-city adolescent Black girls through food security, culinary arts, urban farming, entrepreneurship, and STEM, emphasizing Black Diaspora cultural histories and food practices.
Ghana Girls Connect, Inc. exists to empower young women of the diaspora to pursue their creative passions and turn them into sustainable professional careers. Through cultural immersion, professional development, and women empowerment…
TRIBE, Inc. empowers Black girls through culturally relevant education, leadership development, mentoring, and wellness programming. Our purpose is to increase access to affirming, community-rooted resources that support academic success,…
Ambitious Initiatives is radically improving educational outcomes for underrepresented populations and building a new generation of leaders.
Global Foundation for Girls (GFG) is a Black, Queer, Woman and Youth-led intermediary working with girls of color, gender-fluid youth, and birthing persons of color. GFG focuses on funding distribution, capacity building, technical…
Black Excellence aims to catalyze economic mobility for Black professionals by delivering innovative, purpose-driven programs that expand access to high-impact opportunities, strategic networks, and wealth-building tools, resulting in…
Get girls going (ggg) empowers black teen girls to create social enterprises that solve problems in the world, and in doing so equips them to be leaders that challenge racial and gender inequities that prevent them from success.
SheWill, Inc. is a nonprofit organization dedicated to educating and empowering girls ages 8-17 through financial literacy, career readiness, leadership development, and life skills programming. The organization provides in-school,…
Women's March is committed to dismantling systems of oppression through nonviolent resistance and building inclusive structures guided by self-determination, dignity and respect.
The mission of Girl Plus Environment GPE is to educate engage and empower Black and Brown women+ to stand up for climate and environmental justice in their own communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is E3 Educate Empower Elevate and the most unlike its peers is Women of Choices. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
96 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 96 of the 125 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR SOUTHERN COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds EVERYBLACKGIRL INC ↗
- Who funds THE IMPERATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds BLACK GIRLS SMILE INC ↗
- Who funds Hope For Youth Inc ↗
- Who funds RESTOREHER USAMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds 3D Girls Incorporated ↗
- Who funds The Generation Gap Inc ↗
- Who funds Columbus Wellness Center Outreach & Prevention Project ↗
- Who funds MAKE-IT-CLICK INC ↗
- Who funds Emancipate NC Inc ↗
- Who funds COOL GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds Center for Civic Innovation Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN NEIGHBORHOODS NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS OF EXCELLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds Alternate RootsInc ↗
- Who funds STEM GEMS Inc ↗
- Who funds OPERATION RESTORATION ↗
- Who funds KOINONIA COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS SINGLE PARENT SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds SISTERLOVE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds PROJECT SOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds A LADY NAMED PEARL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BLACK GIRLS FILM CAMP ↗
- Who funds NOLLIE JENKINS FAMILY CENTER INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE BLACK BELT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHOCOLATE SOUL REVIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds One Voice ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HENDERSON COUNTY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Ms Foundation for Women Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Bvm Capacity Building Institute Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · Borealis Philanthropy · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · AEC Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fund for Southern Communities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Fund for Southern Communities Inc?
Find your warmest path to Fund for Southern Communities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.