North Carolina · Nonprofit
WOMEN OF CHOICES
WOMEN OF CHOICES (North Carolina) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $32,000 to it, the largest being FUND FOR SOUTHERN COMMUNITIES INC ($25,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2025
- $17k
- Funders on record
- 2
- Grants received
- $32k
- Net assets
- $-34024
What Women of Choices does
Mission
Transitional housing project for ex=offender females
As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.
Program
Provided housing for single homeless women released from prison or involved in domestic violence also provided housing for women with mental illness and substance abuse.
$50,748 spentof which $16,425 as grants100% of program spending
The program described on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $50,748.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2023, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2023, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
100% of WOMEN OF CHOICES’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 3 reported years ran a deficit.
Leadership and staff
Chief executive
Tamala Fuller
President/ Program Exec Director
As listed on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ.
Who funds it, year by year
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
From the IRS filings of WOMEN OF CHOICES’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
WOMEN OF CHOICES leans on a few funders — its largest provides 78% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
78% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WOMEN OF CHOICES.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
WOMEN OF CHOICES draws 78% of its grant income from funders outside North Carolina, across 2 states in all.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
WOMEN OF CHOICES's revenue fell 30% between 2023 and 2025.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,787 human services nonprofits under $100k, FY2025
Organizations like WOMEN OF CHOICES
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In North Carolina
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WOMEN OF CHOICES: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds WOMEN OF CHOICES?
- WOMEN OF CHOICES (North Carolina) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $32,000 to it, the largest being FUND FOR SOUTHERN COMMUNITIES INC ($25,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does WOMEN OF CHOICES have?
- IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $32,000 in grants to WOMEN OF CHOICES.
- Who is the largest funder of WOMEN OF CHOICES?
- FUND FOR SOUTHERN COMMUNITIES INC is the largest funder on record, with $25,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like WOMEN OF CHOICES find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in North Carolina. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Women of Choices →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2023–2025), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing