· Private foundation
Hmsa Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $8k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $110k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $750k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION | $1,200,000 |
| KOKUA KALIHI VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES | $100,000 |
| WAIMANALO HEALTH CENTER | $100,000 |
| FIVE MOUNTAINS HAWAII | $100,000 |
| MA KA HANA KA IKE BUILDING PROGRAM | $75,000 |
| KUALOA HEEIA ECUMENICAL YOUTH PROJECT | $75,000 |
| THE FOOD BASKET INC | $75,000 |
| HAWAIIAN COMMUNITY ASSETS INC | $65,000 |
| KUMANO I KE ALA | $60,000 |
| WE ARE OCEANIA (FORMERLY PARTNERS IN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION) | $50,000 |
| MOLOKAI CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION PATHWAYS | $50,000 |
| HAWAII ISLAND HIVAIDS FOUNDATION DBA KUMUKAHI HEALTH WELLNESS | $20,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENTER OF OAHU | $20,000 |
| FRIENDS OF HALE 'OLUEA CLUBHOUSE | $20,000 |
| ISLAND OF HAWAII YMCA | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $699k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +94% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $168k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $4.8M · revenue +64%
- WCWAIANAE COMMUNITY RE-DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION4× · 2020–2023 · $600k · revenue +121%
- FMFIVE MOUNTAINS HAWAII INC5× · 2020–2024 · $520k · revenue +354%
Funded once
- TFTHE FOOD BASKET INCone grant, 2023 · $75k
- TKTHE KOHALA CENTERone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -31%
- HRHANA RETREATgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +117%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
to rehabilitate, curate, and steward the natural and cultural resources of Kawa to honor the past, benefit the present, and preserve for the future generations of Ka'u, the Island of Hawaii and all humankind.
To re-establish the systems that sustain our community through educational initiatives and land-based practices that cultivate abundance, regenerate responsibilities, and promote collective health and well being.
Papahana kuaola's mission is to create quality educational programs focused on environmental restoration and economic sustainability fully integrated with hawaiian knowledge in order to exemplify a lifestyle respectful of kanaka, `aina,…
Kahea is a community-based organization working to improve the quality of life for hawai`i's people and future generations through the revitalization and protection of hawai`i's unique natural and cultural resources. kahea advocates for…
Ho`omau ke ola provides comprehensive rehabilitation services including residential and outpatient care, treatment, and counseling to persons recovering from problems related to persons with mental and substance abuse disorders. ho`omau ke…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partners in Development Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Spill the Tea Cafe. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WAIANAE COMMUNITY RE-DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds FIVE MOUNTAINS HAWAII INC ↗
- Who funds WAIMANALO HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds KOKUA KALIHI VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds MA KA HANA KA IKE BUILDING PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds KUALOA-HEEIA ECUMENICAL YOUTH PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD BASKET INC ↗
- Who funds HAWAIIAN COMMUNITY ASSETS INC ↗
- Who funds KUMANO I KE ALA O MAKAWELI ↗
- Who funds MOLOKAI CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION PATH ↗
- Who funds WE ARE OCEANIA ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY MOTHERS HEALTHY BABIES COALITION OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds KE KULA NUI O WAIMANALO ↗
- Who funds FAMILY VIOLENCE & SEXUAL ASSAULT INST DBA IVAT ↗
- Who funds LANAI COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE KOHALA CENTER ↗
- Who funds SPILL THE TEA CAFE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF HALE 'OLUEA CLUBHOUSE ↗
- Who funds HANA RETREAT ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENTER OF OAHU ↗
- Who funds ISLAND OF HAWAI'I YMCA ↗
- Who funds HAWAII INSTITUTE OF PACIFIC AGRICULTURE ↗
- Who funds HAWAII HEALTH & HARM REDUCTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds HAWAII LITERACY INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds MAI MOVEMENT HAWAII INC ↗
- Who funds THE QUEEN'S MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds MAUI FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds HAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds QUEENS UNIVERSITY MEDICAL GROUP ↗
- Who funds HOAKA MANA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Trustees of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop Dba Kamehameha Schools · Atherton Family Foundation · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Aloha United Way Inc · Bank of Hawaii Charitable Fdn · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc · Kosasa Foundation · Stupski Foundation · Central Pacific Bank Foundation · Cooke Foundation Limited · Friends of Hawaii Charities Inc · J Watumull Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hmsa Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hmsa Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Hmsa Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.