· Private foundation
Freedom Reign Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $170k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MERCY FOR ANIMALS | $50,000 |
| HORSES FOR MENTAL HEALTH | $50,000 |
| FARM SANCTUARY | $50,000 |
| AHA | $20,000 |
| DAVID SHELDRIC WILDLIFE TRUST | $20,000 |
| HOOVES | $20,000 |
| WATERSHEDS | $20,000 |
| ANIMAL ASSISTED HAPPINESS | $10,036 |
| WILD NARRATIVE PROJECT | $10,000 |
| EQUINE ADVOCATES | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF SV | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| ONE STEP CLOSER | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AWAMERICAN WILD HORSE PRESERVATION CAMPAIGN5× · 2019–2023 · $920k · revenue +66%
- FSFARM SANCTUARY INC3× · 2022–2024 · $130k · revenue +7%
- HFHorses for Mental Health2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +158%
Funded once
DIRECT RELIEFone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +6%- BFBEST FRIENDSone grant, 2023 · $100k
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETYone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Happy Trails Horse Rescue, located in Bend, Oregon, is dedicated to the protection of horses and their quality of life, to be free from abuse, neglect, abandonment, slaughter, or early euthanasia without just cause. While we strive to…
Healing with Horseplay is an animal protection and welfare organization that rescues animals, primarily horses, that are abused, neglected or to be sent to slaughter and then rehabilitates them. After training them they will be sold to…
Animal rescue, we rescue equines from the slaughter pipeline and rehibilitation
Providing high-quality education and healing therapeutic services that incorporate the physical and emotional benefits of horses. The specific educational, psychological, and therapeutic goals of each client are addressed in a physically…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Equine Advocates Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Riverbend Equine Therapy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN WILD HORSE PRESERVATION CAMPAIGN ↗
- Who funds MERCY FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
- Who funds FARM SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds Horses for Mental Health ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Animal Assisted Happiness Inc ↗
- Who funds Riverbend Equine Therapy ↗
- Who funds EQUINE ADVOCATES INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds HOFFMAN INSTITUTE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF LAUGHING BUCK FARM ↗
- Who funds WILD HORSE CONNECTION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HEROES AND HORSES INC ↗
- Who funds Heart of Horse Sense ↗
- Who funds Jameson Animal Rescue Ranch ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Freedom Reign Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Freedom Reign Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Freedom Reign Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.