· Private foundation
Fred & Jean Allegretti Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k57 grants · $230k
- $10k–50k37 grants · $601k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOUTH WEST FLORIDA HORSE RESCUE INC | $40,000 |
| FUNDAMENTAL NEEDS INC | $35,000 |
| CANINE COMPANIONS | $33,370 |
| HARTT | $30,000 |
| AFS INTERCULTURAL PROGRAMS - COLORADO ROCKIES AREA TEAM | $27,500 |
| GULF COAST HUMANE SOCIETY | $25,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $20,000 |
| MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION EIN 23-7285834 | $20,000 |
| FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES | $20,000 |
| PAWSITIVE BEGINNINGS INC | $20,000 |
| DENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC | $20,000 |
| GRAND CANYON YOUTH | $20,000 |
| HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA | $20,000 |
| SAINT PATRICK HIGH SCHOOL | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $802k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +48% for the ones you funded once.
140 repeat relationships — 72 still active in FY2025, 68 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GCGULF COAST HUMANE SOCIETY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $239k · revenue +38%
- SWSOUTH WEST FLORIDA HORSE RESCUE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $215k · revenue +113%
- CNCALUSA NATURE CENTER & PLANETARIUM INC2× · 2019–2021 · $180k · revenue +128% · 31% of their budget
Funded once
- LLLUCYS LOVE AND LIGHT MINISTRIES POWone grant, 2017 · $50k
- MVMETRO VOLUNTEER LAWYERS(DENVER BARone grant, 2017 · $40k
- LLLUCYS LOVE AND LIGHT MINISTRIES POWERHOUSE OF LOVE AT LIVING WORDone grant, 2018 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.
Our mission is to further the compassionate safe and responsible relationship between animals and people.
The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.
We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.
To offer compassionate care to animals, support safe communities, and provide socially conscious sheltering. (continued on schedule o)
Hope & home creates ways for amazing people to change the lives of children in foster care. as a nondenominational christian charity, hope & home trains, certifies, and actively supports foster families across the state of colorado.…
Seeking to put god's love into action; habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. fort collins habitat for humanity adheres…
Mission: our mission is to break the cycle and heal the childhood trauma resulting from abuse and neglect with specialized treatment, education and community outreach. we believe in a comprehensive, community-based approach to the problem…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is Accessibility Outdoors Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
132 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 132 of the 223 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HEALTHY HARVEST COMMUNITY FARMS INC ↗
- Who funds GULF COAST HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH WEST FLORIDA HORSE RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CALUSA NATURE CENTER & PLANETARIUM INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds Post 1 Foundation ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL REFUGE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds La Rabida Children's Hospital ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds HARTT INC ↗
- Who funds GRAND CANYON YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLED INC ↗
- Who funds Fundamental Needs Inc ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS FOR OUTDOOR COLORADO ↗
- Who funds FAMILY TREE INC ↗
- Who funds MISERICORDIA HOME ↗
- Who funds Longhopes Donkey Shelter Inc ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds THISTLE FARMS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds Operation North Pole Inc ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL EQUESTRIANS INC ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity for Lee and Hendry Counties Inc ↗
- Who funds VALERIE'S HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds PACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Southwest Florida Community Foundation Inc · Colorado Gives Foundation · The United Way of Lee County Inc · The Denver Foundation · Schlessman Foundation Inc · Rose Community Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Daniel R & Anne M Harper Foundation · Collier Community Foundation Inc · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · Caring for Colorado Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fred & Jean Allegretti Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Dr Piper Center for Social Services Inc — 51% of income from government
- Florida Arts Inc — 4% of income from government
- Pace Center for Girlsinc — 2% of income from government
- Special Equestrians Inc — 2% of income from government
- Lee County Alliance for the Arts Inc — 1% of income from government
- Larc Inc — 0% of income from government
- Keep Lee County Beautiful Inc — 0% of income from government
- Valerie's House Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Fred & Jean Allegretti Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Fred & Jean Allegretti Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.