How much did FRED & JEAN ALLEGRETTI FOUNDATION grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of FRED & JEAN ALLEGRETTI FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

theatredancecanine companionscompanions independenceriver districtfilmcalusa nature

2020

covidnami leeeducationspecial populationarts culturehealthshelter residential

2021

troutnami leeeducationarts culturespecial populationhealthhendry

2022

qualified federalfederal disasterdisaster aidtroutnami leearts cultureeducation

2023

nami leearts culturespecial populationeducationsewshealthbasic emergency

2024

special populationarts culturesewseducationhealthbasic emergencyemergency aid

2025

wildspecial populationsewsarts culturehealtheducationenvironment

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 94 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k57 grants · $230k
$10k–50k37 grants · $601k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$19M

Total assets

Largest grants

SOUTH WEST FLORIDA HORSE RESCUE INC$40,000
FUNDAMENTAL NEEDS INC$35,000
CANINE COMPANIONS$33,370
HARTT$30,000
AFS INTERCULTURAL PROGRAMS - COLORADO ROCKIES AREA TEAM$27,500
GULF COAST HUMANE SOCIETY$25,000
FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES$20,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$20,000
DENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$20,000
FOUNDATION FOR LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC$20,000
SAINT PATRICK HIGH SCHOOL$20,000
MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION EIN 23-7285834$20,000
PAWSITIVE BEGINNINGS INC$20,000
GRAND CANYON YOUTH$20,000
HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA$20,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $521k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$7.1M · 139 repeat orgs$329k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

139 repeat relationships — 73 still active in FY2025, 66 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

139

Total granted

$7.1M

$239k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%

+32%

Still filing today

60%

16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsHealthFood & NutritionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

GC
GULF COAST HUMANE SOCIETY
8× · 2018–2025 · $229k · revenue +35%
SW
SOUTH WEST FLORIDA HORSE RESCUE INC
8× · 2018–2025 · $195k · revenue +86%
CN
CALUSA NATURE CENTER & PLANETARIUM
2× · 2019–2021 · $180k · revenue +141% · 31% of their budget

Funded once

LL
LUCYS LOVE AND LIGHT MINISTRIES POWERHOUSE OF LOVE AT LIVING WORD
one grant, 2018 · $25k
GC
GREEN CUP CAFE
one grant, 2022 · $19k
AR
AMERICAN RED CROSS
one grant, 2019 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Suncoast Humane Societyinc

Our mission is to encourage, honor and support the human-animal bond in the suncoastregion of florida. our vision is to celebrate a community whose pets are safe andloved. suncoast humane society provides sheltering, prevention and…

Animals

The Wildcat Sanctuary

Provide sanctuary to wild cats in need and inspire change to end the captive wildlife crisis.

Animals

Mountain Area Land Trust

Mountain area land trust's mission is to save natural areas, wildlife habitat, streams and rivers, working ranches and historic lands, for the benefit of the community and as a legacy for future generations.

Environment

La Plata County Humane Society

Animal shelter, spay & neuter, humane treatment of animals.

Animals

Colorado Legal Services

Provides access to quality civil legal services to as many people in colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal

Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services

Denver Children's Advocacy Center

Dcac works to improve the lives of children traumatized by sexual abuse, neglect and violence-as well as those who are at high-risk with prevention, education and direct services. our mission is to prevent abuse strengthen families restore…

Employment

Humane Society of Yuma

The humane society of yuma provides shelter for over 7,000 animals a year.

Animals

Denver Dumb Friends League

Working with our compassionate community, we will end pet homelessness and animal suffering.

Animals

Child Advocates - Denver Casa

Child advocates - denver casa's mission is to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in denver juvenile court through the services of specially selected and trained community volunteers from a variety of…

Civil Rights

Front Range Equine Rescue

To prevent the abuse and neglect of horses through rescue and education.

Animals

Arizona Foundation for Women

To advance the status of arizona's women through research, advocacy and philanthropy to ensure their safety, health and economic independence. this includes performing the functions of, or carrying out the purposes of the arizona community…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is Misericordia Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/109

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,456

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

100 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

97/100

Grantees still filing

75/100

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$3,812,460Animals$927,767Food & Nutrition$695,000Human Services$593,900Health$562,798Arts & Culture$498,808Recreation & Sports$306,650

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Southwest Florida Community FoundationFL50× affinity22 shared granteesties to 4 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Southwest Florida Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The United Way of Lee County Inc · The Denver Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Schlessman Foundation Inc · El Pomar Foundation · Western Union Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · The Denver Children's Foundation · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation FRED & JEAN ALLEGRETTI FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

7get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: HEALTHY HARVEST COMMUNITY FARMS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 464859913 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on HEALTHY HARVEST COMMUNITY FARMS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 32% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Fred & Jean Allegretti Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Fred & Jean Allegretti Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

FRED & JEAN ALLEGRETTI FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

100 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Fred & Jean Allegretti Foundation?

More from the funding graph

FRED & JEAN ALLEGRETTI FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

100 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Fred & Jean Allegretti Foundation?

More from the funding graph