Skip to content

· Private foundation

Frawley Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$259k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$959kReligion$105kPhilanthropy$44kHealth$37kEducation$37kHuman Services$34kCommunity Improvement$22kArts & Culture$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k34 grants · $73k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $66k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $121k
$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE HARBOUR$70,000
Individual grant recipient$51,000
ST MARYS CHURCH$25,020
ST ISAAC JOGUES CHURCH$20,500
THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION$10,000
Ascension Illinois Foundation$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,000
Individual grant recipient$5,400
CANCER KISS MY COOLEY$5,000
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS #10325$5,000
LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$5,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$4,000
THE NIGHT MINISTRY$3,500
NORTHERN ILLINOIS BANK$3,500
HINSDALE COMMUNITY HOUSE$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $954k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%THE HARBOUR INC: $325k → 8%THE HARBOUR INC: $50k → 8%THE HARBOUR INC: $50k → 8%THE HARBOUR INC: $25k → 8%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $4k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $2k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $2k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $2k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $1k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $1k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $1k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $1k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $1k → 14%THE HARBOUR: $113k → 14%THE HARBOUR: $112k → 14%THE HARBOUR: $70k → 14%THE HARBOUR: $42k → 14%THE HARBOUR: $39k → 14%THE HARBOUR: $32k → 14%THE HARBOUR: $29k → 14%THE HARBOUR: $28k → 14%THE HARBOUR: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IA
IN
CO
VA
DC
HI
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 39 repeat orgs$131k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
9

Total granted

$1.3M
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+27%

Still filing today

33%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HARBOUR INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $940k · revenue +76%
  • BJ
    BELLARMINE JESUIT RETREAT HOUSE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $20k · revenue +21%
  • THE NIGHT MINISTRY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $13k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • HG
    HOLY GHOST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • CP
    CITIZENS POLICE ACADEMY ALUMNI ASSC OF SCHAUMBURG
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • DS
    DOJ SEMINARIAN FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
2
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
3
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
4
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
5
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
6
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
7
The California Medical Innovations Institute Inc

The Institute is a scientific research center dedicated to conducting basic and applied research to advance the understanding of human disease and the improvement of human health. The Institute fosters an innovative research environment…

Education
8
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
9
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
10
The Children's Cancer Cause Inc

The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.

Health
11
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
12
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc; the most unlike its peers is Paws Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE HARBOUR INC: $940,245 · Human ServicesTHE HARBOUR INC+2 more: $14,000 · Human ServicesIndividual grant recipient: $51,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientISPHF: $32,750 · OtherISPHFST ISAAC JOGUES CHURCH: $25,500 · OtherST ISAAC JOGUES CHURCHST MARYS CHURCH: $25,020 · OtherST MARYS CHURCHNORTHERN ILLINOIS BANK: $21,500 · OtherNORTHERN ILLINOIS BANKBELLARMINE JESUIT RETREAT HOUSE INC: $19,500 · OtherHINSDALE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $19,000 · OtherLURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $16,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,525 · Other+35 more: $161,050 · Other+35 moreFIRST BOOK: $13,100 · EducationBig Shoulders Fund: $7,550 · Education+1 more: $550 · EducationCANCER KISS MY COOLEY: $5,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $3,800 · HealthGLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $2,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $500 · HealthOFF THE STREET CLUB: $6,200 · Youth DevelopmentPAWS CHICAGO: $2,050 · AnimalsPAWS INC: $500 · AnimalsCASA KANE COUNTY: $2,000 · Civil Rights
Human Services$954,245Other$387,595Education$21,200Health$12,300Youth Development$6,200Animals$2,550Civil Rights$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HARBOUR INC: $940,245 over 9y, 11% of budgetBELLARMINE JESUIT RETREAT HOUSE INC: $19,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFIRST BOOK: $13,100 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $13,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBig Shoulders Fund: $7,550 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOFF THE STREET CLUB: $6,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER KISS MY COOLEY: $5,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $3,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO: $2,050 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCASA KANE COUNTY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Independence through Conductive Education Inc: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $500 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HARBOUR INC ↗
  • Who funds BELLARMINE JESUIT RETREAT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST BOOK ↗
  • Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds Big Shoulders Fund ↗
  • Who funds OFF THE STREET CLUB ↗
  • Who funds CANCER KISS MY COOLEY ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL16.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Frawley Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frawley Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Frawley Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph