Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Franklin Conklin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$445k
Granted FY2025still arriving
76
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Civil Rights$531kInternational$337kEducation$323kHealth$231kHuman Services$170kYouth Development$161kCrime & Legal$153kArts & Culture$151kOther$0
02FY2025 · 76 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k59 grants · $192k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $253k
$5,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORVALLIS DAYTIME DROP-IN CENTER$25,000
BROOKLYN DEBATE LEAGUE$20,000
CORVALLIS HOUSING FIRST$20,000
WSKG$20,000
INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION$20,000
STEAM TRAIN$20,000
CISPES EDUCATION FUND$18,000
SMALL PROP OWNERS OF SAN FRAN INS$15,000
SECURE JUSTICE$14,000
SELF-ESTEEM BOSTON ED INSTITUTE$11,000
ACLU FOUNDATION OF OREGON$10,000
CONNECTICUT FOOD SHARE$10,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL PLACE$10,000
CHICAGO ADVENTURE THERAPY$10,000
CENTER FOR REPODUCTIVE RIGHTS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $5k → 9%ABC House: $7k → 13%STOVE TEAM INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 15%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $5k → 9%STOVE TEAM INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 15%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $5k → 9%STOVE TEAM INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 15%STOVE TEAM INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 15%CORVALLIS HOUSING FIRST: $20k → 18%CORVALLIS HOUSING FIRST: $7k → 18%CORVALLIS HOUSING FIRST: $7k → 18%CORVALLIS HOUSING FIRST: $7k → 18%CORVALLIS HOUSING FIRST: $7k → 18%CORVALLIS HOUSING FIRST: $7k → 18%CORVALLIS HOUSING FIRST: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
VA
MD
NM
KS
TN
DC
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.6M · 83 repeat orgs$250k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

83 repeat relationships — 58 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

83
33

Total granted

$2.6M
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+18%

Still filing today

71%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $133k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalCivil RightsHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IJ
    INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $168k · revenue +82%
  • CE
    CISPES EDUCATION FUND
    8× · 2017–2025 · $135k · revenue +199%
  • AC
    American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Oregon Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $98k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • ER
    Episcopal Relief & Dev
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • FP
    Family Planning of S Central NY
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • CF
    Community Foundation for S C New York
    one grant, 2017 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon Inc

We believe that the freedoms of press, speech, assembly, and religion, and the rights to due process, equal protection and privacy, are fundamental to a free people. We advance civil liberties and civil rights by activities that include…

—
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
Rogue Climate

Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…

Education
4
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
5
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—
6
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
7
Oregon Research Institute

Oregon research institute is an independent behavioral sciences research center dedicated to understanding human behavior and improving the quality of human life through the prevention and treatment of health, educational, and social…

Social Science
8
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
9
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
10
Oregon Center for Public Policy

The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…

Employment
11
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
12
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grassroots International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Whiteside Theatre Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Mentoring ProgramsSchool District FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…Youth Sports ProgramsFood Banks and PantriesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Community Arts CentersLocal History MuseumsLgbtq+ Community SupportEnvironmental Conservation …Pregnancy Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Policy Research and AdvocacyImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr16%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%37%35–55yr16%14%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/92
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,473

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

87 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 87 of the 134 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
24
Early backer (in before they grew)
86/87
Grantees still filing
62/87
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Self-Esteem Boston Ed Institute — $94,000 · OtherSelf-Esteem Boston Ed InstituteWSKG — $93,000 · OtherWSKGTHE CHURCH OF THE HOLY TRINITY — $77,600 · OtherElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc — $68,000 · OtherBINGHAMTON BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOUNDATION — $67,500 · OtherCOMM FOUND FOR SC NEW YORK — $63,000 · OtherWILLOWS WINGS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $53,000 · Other+83 more — $1,045,700 · Other+83 moreINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION — $168,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUS…CISPES EDUCATION FUND — $135,000 · InternationalCISPES EDUCATION …SURVIVAL INTERNATIONAL (USA) — $39,000 · InternationalSURVIVAL INTERNAT…GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC — $30,000 · InternationalGLOBAL FUND FOR W…FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC — $28,000 · InternationalFINCA INTERNATION…GRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC — $26,000 · InternationalGRASSROOTS INTERN…HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $17,000 · International+3 more — $11,000 · InternationalEarlham College Inc — $70,000 · EducationEarlham Co…Steam Train Inc — $60,000 · EducationSteam Trai…COTTONWOOD GULCH EXPEDITIONS — $47,000 · EducationCOTTONWOOD…BROOKLYN DEBATE LEAGUE INC — $25,000 · EducationBROOKLYN D…Oregon State University Foundation — $25,000 · EducationOregon Sta…CHESS FOR SUCCESS — $15,250 · EducationCHESS FOR …THE COMMONS LAW CENTER — $11,000 · EducationSMART READING — $9,500 · Education+5 more — $17,250 · Education+5 moreAmerican Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Oregon Inc — $97,750 · Civil RightsAmerican …ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER — $60,000 · Civil RightsELECTRONI…PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION — $57,000 · Civil RightsPEOPLE FO…SECURE JUSTICE — $14,000 · Civil RightsSECURE JU…THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $10,000 · Civil Rights+3 more — $13,900 · Civil Rights+3 moreCORVALLIS HOMELESS SHELTER COALITION — $57,000 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesCenter Against Rape and Domestic Violence — $21,250 · Human ServicesEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT — $20,000 · Human ServicesABC HOUSE INC — $7,000 · Human Services+2 more — $6,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERSHIP FOR SAFETY AND JUSTICE — $59,000 · Crime & LegalCHICAGO ADVENTURE THERAPY NFP — $50,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more — $1,000 · Crime & LegalFAMILY PLANNING OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEW YORK INC — $63,000 · HealthCORVALLIS DAYTIME DROP-IN CENTER — $25,000 · HealthINTERNATIONAL LYME AND ASSOCIATED DISEASES EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION IN — $17,000 · Health
Other$1,561,800International$454,000Education$280,000Civil Rights$252,650Human Services$141,250Crime & Legal$110,000Health$105,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION — $168,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCISPES EDUCATION FUND — $135,000 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetAmerican Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Oregon Inc — $97,750 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetEarlham College Inc — $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc — $68,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBINGHAMTON BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOUNDATION — $67,500 over 7y, 82% of budgetFAMILY PLANNING OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEW YORK INC — $63,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER — $60,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetSteam Train Inc — $60,000 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR SAFETY AND JUSTICE — $59,000 over 7y, 5.6% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION — $57,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCORVALLIS HOMELESS SHELTER COALITION — $57,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetWILLOWS WINGS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $53,000 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetThe Land Institute — $52,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCHICAGO ADVENTURE THERAPY NFP — $50,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetCOTTONWOOD GULCH EXPEDITIONS — $47,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetFUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE — $43,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER — $43,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBASIC RIGHTS OREGON — $42,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetFOOD & WATER WATCH — $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSURVIVAL INTERNATIONAL (USA) — $39,000 over 7y, 5.0% of budgetSojourners Inc — $35,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCORVALLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $31,300 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC — $28,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC — $26,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCORVALLIS DAYTIME DROP-IN CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetBROOKLYN DEBATE LEAGUE INC — $25,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetOregon State University Foundation — $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting formrly Foundation for National Progress — $24,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCenter Against Rape and Domestic Violence — $21,250 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOLIDAGO FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetREFUGEE SERVICES OF TEXAS INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL LYME AND ASSOCIATED DISEASES EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION IN — $17,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetPRO-CHOICE OREGON FOUNDATION — $17,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetGIRLS BUILD — $16,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCHESS FOR SUCCESS — $15,250 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSECURE JUSTICE — $14,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetCORVALLIS SISTER CITIES ASSOCIATION — $13,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetLINN BENTON FOOD SHARE — $12,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWILLAMETTE WRITERS INC — $12,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetTHE COMMONS LAW CENTER — $11,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds CISPES EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Oregon Inc ↗
  • Who funds Earlham College Inc ↗
  • Who funds Electronic Frontier Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BINGHAMTON BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PLANNING OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Steam Train Inc ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR SAFETY AND JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CORVALLIS HOMELESS SHELTER COALITION ↗
  • Who funds WILLOWS WINGS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Land Institute ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO ADVENTURE THERAPY NFP ↗
  • Who funds COTTONWOOD GULCH EXPEDITIONS ↗
  • Who funds FUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BASIC RIGHTS OREGON ↗
  • Who funds FOOD & WATER WATCH ↗
  • Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
  • Who funds SURVIVAL INTERNATIONAL (USA) ↗
  • Who funds Sojourners Inc ↗
  • Who funds CORVALLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC ↗
  • Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CORVALLIS DAYTIME DROP-IN CENTER ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …Benton Community Foun…The Autzen FoundationThe Ford Family Found…The Collins FoundationMeyer Memorial TrustThe Bessemer Giving F…United Way of Benton …Good Samaritan Hospit…Mario and Alma Pasteg…The Larson LegacyMarie Lamfrom Charita…
The Oregon Community FoundationOR45.2× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Benton Community Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Bessemer Giving Fund · United Way of Benton & Lincoln Counties · Good Samaritan Hospital Corvallis · Mario and Alma Pastega Family Foundation · The Larson Legacy · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Franklin Conklin Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Jackson Street Youth Shelter Inc — 59% of income from government
  • Operation Fuel Incorporated — 51% of income from government
  • Abc House Inc — 25% of income from government
  • Corvallis Environmental Center — 18% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Corvallis Inc — 16% of income from government
  • Corvallis Homeless Shelter Coalition — 11% of income from government
  • Whiteside Theatre Foundation — 10% of income from government
  • Corvallis Daytime Drop-in Center — 8% of income from government
  • Girl Scouts of Oregon & Sw Washington Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Albany Public Schools Foundation — 3% of income from government
  • Smart Reading — 3% of income from government
  • Pacific University — 2% of income from government
  • Willamette Writers Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Chess for Success — 2% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College — 1% of income from government
  • Corvallis Arts Center Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Steam Train Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Reed Institute — 1% of income from government
  • Oregon Public Broadcasting — 1% of income from government
  • Southern Oregon University Foundation — 0% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 134 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines