Skip to content

· Private foundation

Franklin Conklin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$445k
Granted FY2025still arriving
76
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Civil Rights$531kInternational$337kEducation$323kHealth$231kHuman Services$170kYouth Development$161kCrime & Legal$153kArts & Culture$151kOther$0
02FY2025 · 76 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k59 grants · $192k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $253k
$5,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORVALLIS DAYTIME DROP-IN CENTER$25,000
CORVALLIS HOUSING FIRST$20,000
INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION$20,000
BROOKLYN DEBATE LEAGUE$20,000
STEAM TRAIN$20,000
WSKG$20,000
CISPES EDUCATION FUND$18,000
SMALL PROP OWNERS OF SAN FRAN INS$15,000
SECURE JUSTICE$14,000
SELF-ESTEEM BOSTON ED INSTITUTE$11,000
NEIGHBORS FOR CLEAN AIR$10,000
ACLU FOUNDATION OF OREGON$10,000
CENTER FOR REPODUCTIVE RIGHTS$10,000
CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING$10,000
CHICAGO ADVENTURE THERAPY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $5k → 9%ABC House: $7k → 13%STOVE TEAM INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 15%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $5k → 9%STOVE TEAM INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 15%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $5k → 9%STOVE TEAM INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 15%STOVE TEAM INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 15%CORVALLIS HOUSING FIRST: $20k → 18%CORVALLIS HOUSING FIRST: $7k → 18%CORVALLIS HOUSING FIRST: $7k → 18%CORVALLIS HOUSING FIRST: $7k → 18%CORVALLIS HOUSING FIRST: $7k → 18%CORVALLIS HOUSING FIRST: $7k → 18%CORVALLIS HOUSING FIRST: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
VA
MD
NM
KS
TN
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 83 repeat orgs$250k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

83 repeat relationships: 58 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

83
33

Total granted

$2.6M
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+14%

Still filing today

71%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $133k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalCivil RightsHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IJ
    INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $168k · revenue +82%
  • CE
    CISPES EDUCATION FUND
    8× · 2017–2025 · $135k · revenue +199%
  • AC
    American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Oregon Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $98k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • CF
    Community Foundation for S C New York
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • FP
    Family Planning of S Central NY
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • ER
    Episcopal Relief & Dev
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon Inc

We believe that the freedoms of press, speech, assembly, and religion, and the rights to due process, equal protection and privacy, are fundamental to a free people. We advance civil liberties and civil rights by activities that include…

—
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
Rogue Climate

Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…

Education
4
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
5
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—
6
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
7
Oregon Research Institute

Oregon research institute is an independent behavioral sciences research center dedicated to understanding human behavior and improving the quality of human life through the prevention and treatment of health, educational, and social…

Social Science
8
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
9
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
10
Oregon Center for Public Policy

The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…

Employment
11
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
12
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grassroots International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Whiteside Theatre Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

87 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 87 of the 134 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
25
Early backer (in before they grew)
86/87
Grantees still filing
61/87
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Self-Esteem Boston Ed Institute: $94,000 · OtherSelf-Esteem Boston Ed InstituteWSKG: $93,000 · OtherWSKGTHE CHURCH OF THE HOLY TRINITY: $77,600 · OtherElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc: $68,000 · OtherBINGHAMTON BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOUNDATION: $67,500 · OtherCOMM FOUND FOR SC NEW YORK: $63,000 · OtherWILLOWS WINGS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $53,000 · Other+83 more: $1,045,700 · Other+83 moreINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $168,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUS…CISPES EDUCATION FUND: $135,000 · InternationalCISPES EDUCATION …SURVIVAL INTERNATIONAL (USA): $39,000 · InternationalSURVIVAL INTERNAT…GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $30,000 · InternationalGLOBAL FUND FOR W…FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $28,000 · InternationalFINCA INTERNATION…GRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $26,000 · InternationalGRASSROOTS INTERN…HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $17,000 · International+3 more: $11,000 · InternationalEarlham College Inc: $70,000 · EducationEarlham Co…Steam Train Inc: $60,000 · EducationSteam Trai…COTTONWOOD GULCH EXPEDITIONS: $47,000 · EducationCOTTONWOOD…Oregon State University Foundation: $25,000 · EducationOregon Sta…BROOKLYN DEBATE LEAGUE INC: $25,000 · EducationBROOKLYN D…CHESS FOR SUCCESS: $15,250 · EducationCHESS FOR …THE COMMONS LAW CENTER: $11,000 · EducationSMART READING: $9,500 · Education+5 more: $17,250 · Education+5 moreAmerican Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Oregon Inc: $97,750 · Civil RightsAmerican …ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER: $60,000 · Civil RightsELECTRONI…PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION: $57,000 · Civil RightsPEOPLE FO…SECURE JUSTICE: $14,000 · Civil RightsSECURE JU…THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $10,000 · Civil Rights+3 more: $13,900 · Civil Rights+3 moreCORVALLIS HOMELESS SHELTER COALITION: $57,000 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesCenter Against Rape and Domestic Violence: $21,250 · Human ServicesEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $20,000 · Human ServicesABC HOUSE INC: $7,000 · Human Services+2 more: $6,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERSHIP FOR SAFETY AND JUSTICE: $59,000 · Crime & LegalCHICAGO ADVENTURE THERAPY NFP: $50,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $1,000 · Crime & LegalFAMILY PLANNING OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $63,000 · HealthCORVALLIS DAYTIME DROP-IN CENTER: $25,000 · HealthINTERNATIONAL LYME AND ASSOCIATED DISEASES EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION IN: $17,000 · Health
Other$1,561,800International$454,000Education$280,000Civil Rights$252,650Human Services$141,250Crime & Legal$110,000Health$105,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $168,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCISPES EDUCATION FUND: $135,000 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetAmerican Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Oregon Inc: $97,750 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetEarlham College Inc: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc: $68,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBINGHAMTON BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOUNDATION: $67,500 over 7y, 82% of budgetFAMILY PLANNING OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $63,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER: $60,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetSteam Train Inc: $60,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR SAFETY AND JUSTICE: $59,000 over 7y, 5.6% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION: $57,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCORVALLIS HOMELESS SHELTER COALITION: $57,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetWILLOWS WINGS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $53,000 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetThe Land Institute: $52,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCHICAGO ADVENTURE THERAPY NFP: $50,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetCOTTONWOOD GULCH EXPEDITIONS: $47,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetFUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE: $43,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $43,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBASIC RIGHTS OREGON: $42,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetFOOD & WATER WATCH: $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSURVIVAL INTERNATIONAL (USA): $39,000 over 7y, 5.0% of budgetSojourners Inc: $35,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCORVALLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $31,300 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $28,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $26,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCORVALLIS DAYTIME DROP-IN CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN DEBATE LEAGUE INC: $25,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting formrly Foundation for National Progress: $24,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCenter Against Rape and Domestic Violence: $21,250 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOLIDAGO FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetREFUGEE SERVICES OF TEXAS INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPRO-CHOICE OREGON FOUNDATION: $17,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL LYME AND ASSOCIATED DISEASES EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION IN: $17,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetGIRLS BUILD: $16,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCHESS FOR SUCCESS: $15,250 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSECURE JUSTICE: $14,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetCORVALLIS SISTER CITIES ASSOCIATION: $13,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetWILLAMETTE WRITERS INC: $12,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetLINN BENTON FOOD SHARE: $12,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMONS LAW CENTER: $11,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds CISPES EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Oregon Inc ↗
  • Who funds Earlham College Inc ↗
  • Who funds Electronic Frontier Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BINGHAMTON BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PLANNING OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Steam Train Inc ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR SAFETY AND JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CORVALLIS HOMELESS SHELTER COALITION ↗
  • Who funds WILLOWS WINGS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Land Institute ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO ADVENTURE THERAPY NFP ↗
  • Who funds COTTONWOOD GULCH EXPEDITIONS ↗
  • Who funds FUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BASIC RIGHTS OREGON ↗
  • Who funds FOOD & WATER WATCH ↗
  • Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
  • Who funds SURVIVAL INTERNATIONAL (USA) ↗
  • Who funds Sojourners Inc ↗
  • Who funds CORVALLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CORVALLIS DAYTIME DROP-IN CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR45.2× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Benton Community Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Bessemer Giving Fund · United Way of Benton & Lincoln Counties · Good Samaritan Hospital Corvallis · Mario and Alma Pastega Family Foundation · The Larson Legacy · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Franklin Conklin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Franklin Conklin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Jackson Street Youth Shelter Inc: 59% of income from government
  • Operation Fuel Incorporated: 51% of income from government
  • Abc House Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Corvallis Environmental Center: 18% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Corvallis Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Corvallis Homeless Shelter Coalition: 11% of income from government
  • Whiteside Theatre Foundation: 10% of income from government
  • Corvallis Daytime Drop-in Center: 8% of income from government
  • Girl Scouts of Oregon & Sw Washington Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Albany Public Schools Foundation: 3% of income from government
  • Smart Reading: 3% of income from government
  • Pacific University: 2% of income from government
  • Willamette Writers Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Chess for Success: 2% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
  • Corvallis Arts Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Steam Train Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Reed Institute: 1% of income from government
  • Oregon Public Broadcasting: 1% of income from government
  • Southern Oregon University Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 134 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Franklin Conklin’s filings →

More from the funding graph